![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Granby" wrote in message ... Is that so unusual? The ILS into CXY used to have ADF REQUIRED on the plate, even though you could easily fly it without such equipment if receiving radar vectors. (The plate now says ADF or RADAR, but was only changed recently.) This plate does not say "DME REQUIRED". |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please see my not in the SLE LOC BC RWY13 thread regarding DME on ILS's. FAA
has an initiative to standardiae ILS approaches that has the effect of making many of the existing ILS approaches DME required where they were not before. It happened to Providence this summer. We used to have 2 ILSs that did not require DME and one that did. Now every approach into Providence with the exception of the VOR 5, VOR 34 and NDB 5 approaches requires DME or IFR GPS. "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: "Mike Granby" wrote in message ... Is that so unusual? The ILS into CXY used to have ADF REQUIRED on the plate, even though you could easily fly it without such equipment if receiving radar vectors. (The plate now says ADF or RADAR, but was only changed recently.) This plate does not say "DME REQUIRED". -- --Ray Andraka, P.E. President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc. 401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950 http://www.andraka.com "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Usually if DME or other facility is required, it's in the title, or in a note that appears in VERY large BOLD text
and says something like "ADF or RADAR is required" in the plan view. Neither appears on this chart. If you use NOBBY as the IAF, you'll have no need for DME, as it's not required for the LOC MAP (timing works just as well) and it's not required for the missed approach procedure. My read is "if you use DME," you must receive the localizer simultaneously. It's possible that's so you positively identify the localizer, and don't start to fly inbound too soon on a false sidelobe from the localizer antenna. Which could ruin your day. Max T, MCFI Don Faulkner wrote in message news ![]() Hi folks. I've got a bit of a puzzle here. First off, I'm a student pilot, so maybe I haven't gotten to this yet. Take a look at the ILS 18 plate for Springdale, AR (ASG): http://myairplane.com/databases/appr...l/ASG_ir18.pdf First, note that the approach is "ILS RWY 18" --- Next, read in the notes section: Circling NA east of Rwy 18-36, inoperative table does not apply. DME from RZC VORTAC Simultaneous reception of I-ASG and RZC DME required. --- So, the way I read this, DME is not required, since the approach is ILS not ILS DME, but it is required since "simultaneous reception ... is required." I guess my real question is, "Is this approach authorized for an aircraft without DME? And if not, why don't they call it ILS-DME?" but read on for my thinking... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree - and to clarify, the original poster's quotation of the notes
section lacks the proper punctuation. All of those comments are independent of each other. There are DME arcs - if you use DME (and that is DME from VOR, not the localizer) then you must also be able to receive the localizer as well. As Max T pointed out, you can fly the approach without DME. "Max T, CFI" wrote in message news:Yvngb.700718$uu5.114905@sccrnsc04... Usually if DME or other facility is required, it's in the title, or in a note that appears in VERY large BOLD text and says something like "ADF or RADAR is required" in the plan view. Neither appears on this chart. If you use NOBBY as the IAF, you'll have no need for DME, as it's not required for the LOC MAP (timing works just as well) and it's not required for the missed approach procedure. My read is "if you use DME," you must receive the localizer simultaneously. It's possible that's so you positively identify the localizer, and don't start to fly inbound too soon on a false sidelobe from the localizer antenna. Which could ruin your day. Max T, MCFI Don Faulkner wrote in message news ![]() Hi folks. I've got a bit of a puzzle here. First off, I'm a student pilot, so maybe I haven't gotten to this yet. Take a look at the ILS 18 plate for Springdale, AR (ASG): http://myairplane.com/databases/appr...l/ASG_ir18.pdf First, note that the approach is "ILS RWY 18" --- Next, read in the notes section: Circling NA east of Rwy 18-36, inoperative table does not apply. DME from RZC VORTAC Simultaneous reception of I-ASG and RZC DME required. --- So, the way I read this, DME is not required, since the approach is ILS not ILS DME, but it is required since "simultaneous reception ... is required." I guess my real question is, "Is this approach authorized for an aircraft without DME? And if not, why don't they call it ILS-DME?" but read on for my thinking... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The perfect approach | Capt.Doug | Home Built | 25 | December 3rd 04 03:37 AM |
Established on the approach - Checkride question | endre | Instrument Flight Rules | 59 | October 6th 03 04:36 PM |
Terminology of New WAAS, VNAV, LPV approach types | Tarver Engineering | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | August 5th 03 03:50 AM |
IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 09:03 PM |
CAT II Minimums on a CAT I Approach | Giwi | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | July 24th 03 07:46 AM |