Daley whining (again) for his ADIZ

"Paul kgyy" wrote in message
ups.com...
http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/...s-daley10.html

I hate to admit that I live here.


Someone or organization needs to take that guy out ASAP!

Paul kgyy wrote:
http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/...s-daley10.html

I hate to admit that I live here.

Eventually we will have to strike. No pilot flying any kind of aircraft
will fly into or out of one of these ADIZs until they are removed.
Scabs will have to be dealt with in the usual manner. I see no real
alternative.

Eventually we will have to strike. No pilot flying any kind of aircraft
will fly into or out of one of these ADIZs until they are removed.

Isn't that what they want?

The only way this could possibly work is if AIRLINE pilots refused to go
to any of the cities so restricted. When the airlines can't fly there,
people will notice.

Jose
--
Money: what you need when you run out of brains.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

Jose wrote:
Eventually we will have to strike. No pilot flying any kind of aircraft
will fly into or out of one of these ADIZs until they are removed.
Isn't that what they want?

He did say "any kind of aircraft".
Won't happen. Didn't Boeing just move its headquarters into that area,
or is my memory in need of a reset?

wrote:
Jose wrote:

Eventually we will have to strike. No pilot flying any kind of aircraft
will fly into or out of one of these ADIZs until they are removed.

Isn't that what they want?


He did say "any kind of aircraft".
Won't happen. Didn't Boeing just move its headquarters into that area,
or is my memory in need of a reset?

Apparently they got a deal on the taxes. They'll leave in 20 years when
the grace period is up and they find out what Chicago REALLY thinks of
big business.

"Jose" wrote in message
. com...

Eventually we will have to strike. No pilot flying any kind of aircraft
will fly into or out of one of these ADIZs until they are removed.


Isn't that what they want?

The only way this could possibly work is if AIRLINE pilots refused to go
to any of the cities so restricted. When the airlines can't fly there,
people will notice.


"No pilot flying any kind of aircraft" would seem to include "AIRLINE
pilots".

In article .net,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"Jose" wrote in message
. com...

Eventually we will have to strike. No pilot flying any kind of aircraft
will fly into or out of one of these ADIZs until they are removed.


Isn't that what they want?

The only way this could possibly work is if AIRLINE pilots refused to go
to any of the cities so restricted. When the airlines can't fly there,
people will notice.


"No pilot flying any kind of aircraft" would seem to include "AIRLINE
pilots".

What Chicago needs:

1. a Bozo-free zone (no Daleys allowed)

2. What we downstaters always told the Chigagoans: another fire.

Jose wrote:
Eventually we will have to strike. No pilot flying any kind of aircraft
will fly into or out of one of these ADIZs until they are removed.

Isn't that what they want?

The only way this could possibly work is if AIRLINE pilots refused to go
to any of the cities so restricted. When the airlines can't fly there,
people will notice.

I said ALL pilots, including airline pilots. As I said, scabs will have
to be dealt with.

The airline pilots wanted top be armed on Sept. 12, 2001.
Congress finally passed a law, but the TSA has dragged its
feet and only a handful are armed.
Why didn't the pilots just refuse to fly on Sept. 20 unless
they were armed. The answer, they are more afraid of the
government and the news media than they are of the
terrorists. The union, toothless, they only strike for more
money, not armed pilots and crews, not the rights of
citizens.
Government response...if pilots were armed, somebody on the
plane might get hurt, if the plane is hijacked we will shoot
it down with a missile from an F16 and kill them all.


--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
some support
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties.


"cjcampbell" wrote in
message
oups.com...
|
| Jose wrote:
| Eventually we will have to strike. No pilot flying any
kind of aircraft
| will fly into or out of one of these ADIZs until they
are removed.
|
| Isn't that what they want?
|
| The only way this could possibly work is if AIRLINE
pilots refused to go
| to any of the cities so restricted. When the airlines
can't fly there,
| people will notice.
|
| I said ALL pilots, including airline pilots. As I said,
scabs will have
| to be dealt with.
|

Jim Macklin wrote:
The airline pilots wanted top be armed on Sept. 12, 2001.
Congress finally passed a law, but the TSA has dragged its
feet and only a handful are armed.
Why didn't the pilots just refuse to fly on Sept. 20 unless
they were armed. The answer, they are more afraid of the
government and the news media than they are of the
terrorists. The union, toothless, they only strike for more
money, not armed pilots and crews, not the rights of
citizens.

Then it is time to start teaching airline pilots that it is
unreasonable to have government and media that must be feared.