![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:29:01 -0500, "Barry" wrote:
When doing an ILS approach, with the glideslope, is it a requirement to be able to identify the outer marker or a substitute? FAR 91.175(k) lists the outer marker as one of the "basic ground components" and gives the acceptable substitutes, but doesn't explicitly say that it's required. The AIM 1-1-9(j) on "Inoperative Components" mentions the localizer and glideslope, but says nothing about the outer marker. If you answer, please give a specific FAA reference that says whether or not the OM or a substitute is required. Identification of the OM is not required but why do you think there will be a specific reference to say that something is NOT required? It's a good idea to check the OM, **if there is one**, in order to confirm your GS altitude at that point, but there is no legal requirement. You may also note that there is no "penalty" if an OM is not functioning. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Barry wrote: If you answer, please give a specific FAA reference that says whether or not the OM or a substitute is required. You guys that want a specific reference should buy Summit's Aviation Reference Library and do your own research. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Barry wrote: When doing an ILS approach, with the glideslope, is it a requirement to be able to identify the outer marker or a substitute? FAR 91.175(k) lists the outer marker as one of the "basic ground components" and gives the acceptable substitutes, but doesn't explicitly say that it's required. The AIM 1-1-9(j) on "Inoperative Components" mentions the localizer and glideslope, but says nothing about the outer marker. If you answer, please give a specific FAA reference that says whether or not the OM or a substitute is required. Whenever someone makes a post requesting specific FAA references, you are in effect asking for someone else to do your research for you an challenging them in the process. When I see I post like that I recommend you hire a Washington DC top end aviation law firm and pay for the precision you expect. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TKM MB75 Marker Beacon Receiver | Darrel Toepfer | Home Built | 0 | August 18th 04 10:31 PM |
KR-21 marker beacon pinout? | JFLEISC | Home Built | 0 | March 17th 04 10:46 PM |
Canard planes swept wing outer VG's? | Paul Lee | Home Built | 8 | January 4th 04 08:10 PM |
Marker Beacon Antenna - Paging Jim Weir. | Bart D. Hull | Home Built | 1 | November 27th 03 10:31 PM |
marker beacon | Gary Gunn | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | November 3rd 03 05:20 PM |