![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just watched a program about the huge Oresund bridge between Denmark
and Sweden, and there was a segment about how the corrosion problem for the bridge was dealt with. Instead of painting, they use sealed compartments that have the air humidity kept below 60%. This they said eliminates corrosion. This started me thinking about the corrosion we aircraft owners are told to guard against, since I have personally been told by an overhaul shop, that half of all the engines he sees that need work, need it because of corrosion. There are several "facts" that I am beginning to question as to their validity. The ones that come to mind a 1) You have to get the oil up to 180 deg F or the water in the oil won't evaporate. 2) Starting and ground running the engine for a minute or so is the "worst" thing you can possibly do. 3) Flying for an hour will "clean" the oil (or at least evaporate the water, preventing acid formation) so that it doesn't turn to acid and dissolve the engine while sitting idle. There are probably some others, but these three stand out the most to me. Now I am sure that what I am about to say will not go over well with some people, but I have the asbestos suit ready and waiting. My take is that these three "facts" are a bunch of poppycock. Why or how they got started is anyone's guess, but the reasoning behind some of them is understandable, for others I wonder what they were smoking at the time. My thoughts are along these lines, and I admit I could be wrong, but I don't think so. Concerning fact #1...Why does someone think that the water has to be brought to a boil before it will evaporate. Water evaporates very well even at sub-freezing temperatures,much less at the warm to hot temps created in a running engine. And at say 140 F, I can't help but believe that any water or moisture in the engine will be purged quickly. With water at that temp you can literally see clouds of vapor escaping, and this is well below boiling. Not that the hotter the engine gets the water doesn't evaporate more quickly, it does I'm sure. It's just that in the engine cases which are open to the air at the breather tube and elsewhere, any heat above say 85 F or so will be more that enough to dry out the oil in the crankcase. As evidence of this, I ground run my engine all the time and have for many years. I live in a VERY humid climate. The oil analysis reports I have done on a regular basis by Blackstone have never shown any trace of water or moisture. I recently tore done the engine for rebuild after more then 15 years of perfect service, and the cam lobes, lifter faces, and every part in the engine was shiny and totally free from rust or any other corrosion. Concerning fact #2.... We all constantly clean and oil many of the things we own such as tools, etc. It is the layer of oil that prevents the rust. I accept that if the oil is too acidic it could corrode or "chem mill" the metal, but it takes highly acidic liquid to do that, and the oils I use have acid buffers in them to deal with mild acidity. Running is the only way to re-oil all the parts in the engine, especially the cam and lifters. Just like oiling the machinists tools that I own keeps them rust free, oiling the engine keeps it rust free I would think. Concerning fact #3.... This is the one that really makes me wonder. If oil needs to be changed every 25-50 hours, how does flying for an hour clean it? I can't help but think that the longer the oil is used the dirtier it gets. I guess they think that it's "really" dirty just after starting, and you "clean" it as you fly. In closing, it seems to me that many of the things we are told are contradictory on this subject. I have witnessed many OWT come and go in my time, so common knowledge isn't always correct. Lean of peak operation comes to mind. Some blockheads still don't think George Braly has it right. Blue Skies Rusty |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Water in our oil, or just alot of hot air? | [email protected] | Piloting | 9 | April 24th 06 05:30 AM |
Water in our oil, or just alot of hot air? | [email protected] | Owning | 24 | April 24th 06 03:27 AM |
Induction System Water Problem | Mike Spera | Owning | 1 | January 30th 05 05:29 AM |
Questions regarding Air/Oil Separators | Doodybutch | Owning | 6 | April 20th 04 05:56 PM |
Water Cooled Jet Engines: a possibillity then and now? | The Enlightenment | Military Aviation | 3 | December 18th 03 09:41 AM |