![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am think of having one of these Air/Oil Separators installed on my R182
(Lycoming O-540) at annual this summer. I have a couple of questions: 1) Do they actually work and keep the oily mess off the bottom of the plane? 2) I think there are at least two different ones available - which is the best? 3) Are there any problems with them? Thanks, DB |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DB, I've been through 4 of these. The original (brand unknown) that came
with my plane (a Navion with wet vacuum pump). Then I tried an Eclipse separator, which was worthless. Next I tried an M20 turbos dual installation (one for crankcase breather, the second for the wet pump). In fact my Navion was the test bed for the M20 wet vacuum separator. Look at the pictures on their website; that's my firewall. Still not happy with the results, so I went with an Airwolf, which handles both the vac pump AND the crankcase breather. Absolutely clean and dry for over a year now. The plumbing is a bit more complicated, and the unit itself is a bit larger, but it actually does what it's supposed to. And does it very, very well. Rip Doodybutch wrote: I am think of having one of these Air/Oil Separators installed on my R182 (Lycoming O-540) at annual this summer. I have a couple of questions: 1) Do they actually work and keep the oily mess off the bottom of the plane? 2) I think there are at least two different ones available - which is the best? 3) Are there any problems with them? Thanks, DB |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doodybutch wrote:
I am think of having one of these Air/Oil Separators installed on my R182 (Lycoming O-540) at annual this summer. I have a couple of questions: 1) Do they actually work and keep the oily mess off the bottom of the plane? 2) I think there are at least two different ones available - which is the best? 3) Are there any problems with them? My PA 24 250 arrived with a Walker (now Airwolf, I believe) air/oil sep installed. It's designed to handle both the breather and a wet vacuum pump, but since I have a dry pump at the moment (to be remedied when the thing starts to act up) one fitting is plugged off. It works VERY well; if I have any complaint it's that it's on the largish side and whoever installed selected a firewall location designed to maximize annoyance when changing the oil filter. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 08:15:25 -0400, "Doodybutch"
wrote: I am think of having one of these Air/Oil Separators installed on my R182 (Lycoming O-540) at annual this summer. I have a couple of questions: 1) Do they actually work and keep the oily mess off the bottom of the plane? 2) I think there are at least two different ones available - which is the best? 3) Are there any problems with them? Thanks, DB The following is an excerpt from Sacramento Skyranch's monthly newsletter (hopefully not breaking any copyright rules here). Quite an eye-opener on the whole Air/Oil Separator issue. The Sacramento Skyranch website is at www.sacskyranch.com and is full of very interesting info. Crankcase Distillation of Water by Air Oil Separators The burning of 40 gallons of fuel during a flight produces 40 gallons of water. Although most of the water goes out the exhaust as a gas, some ends up in the engine crankcase as byproducts of combustion. In cold weather we can sometimes see this crankcase water as droplets on the oil dipstick or rocker box. Engines, such as the Lycoming O-235-L2C, often have rust inside the rocker covers where the water condenses and collects inside the cover. How is water that is produced as a byproduct of combustion, and finds its way into the engine crankcase, removed from the engine? Your engine is a distillery in which we add combustion byproducts, including water and unburned fuel into a oil bath; agitate and aerate with the crankshaft and other rotating parts; heat until the more volatile products, principally water, vaporizes into a gas and flows thru a pipe called the crankcase breather into the cooler atmosphere. This is illustrated as such: [Sorry, I can't paste the picture in here] Usually we think that we need to raise the temperature of the distillery to the boiling point of water 212 degrees F. (-2 degrees per 1,000 feet above sea level) to separate the water from the oil. However, since the water, oil, and other byproducts are being thoroughly mixed, the water forms a azetrope (constant boiling mixture) with some of the other compounds which changes the mixture's boiling point. We end up with a range of boiling temperatures, possibly lower and higher. A contaminate that has a higher boiling temperature than water, when mixed with water to form a azetrope, lowers the contaminants boiling temperature so that the distillation of water from our sump also removes other contaminants from the oil. This is the milky white mixture you sometimes see on the engine breather, dipstick or other condensing surface. Corrosion pitting is the most common reason camshaft lobes and followers are damaged (2nd might be stuck valves). Making sure your distillery is functioning properly by removing water from the engine crankcase is important if you want to prevent corrosion damage to your engine. Normally, you need not worry; operate the distillery often and make sure you completely warm it up. Ground running the distillery just adds water and doesn't produce steam -- you need to fly your distillery to fully heat it up. Every distillery has a condenser that turns the distilled vapors back into liquid form. With engines we prefer that condensation occurs in the atmosphere or in a vent line that slopes downward. Now lets modify the distillery and add what is commonly called a "air/oil separator" to our system. I use the more accurate term "gas/liquid separator" since our separator cannot tell the difference between air and any other gas, or oil and any other liquid. If our gas/liquid separator is cooler than our oil sump, then our gas/liquid separator also becomes a condenser with a return line back to the engine. Oil, along with any distilled liquids, are returned to the engine. Take for example a worst case scenario. You mount our gas/liquid separator in a cold area of the engine compartment. You attach it to a large heat sink called the firewall. Everything you have done has increased your condenser's efficiency at condensing water and other vapors into a liquid. Now you're engine pumps the condensate back into the engine along with some engine oil. You couldn't design a better way of trapping water in your engine. The warmer our gas/liquid separator, the less efficient our distillery is at condensing water and pumping it back into the engine. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
3) Are there any problems with them?
Thanks, DB The following is an excerpt from Sacramento Skyranch's monthly newsletter (hopefully not breaking any copyright rules here). Quite an eye-opener on the whole Air/Oil Separator issue. The Sacramento Skyranch website is at www.sacskyranch.com and is full of very interesting info. Victor at Victor Engines in Palo Alto claims he can always tell which engines have had air oil separators. More corrosion. What one needs for the next level is a decanter at the bottom of the Walker type-- oil goes back into engine, water gets dumped. On Twin Bonanzas, Dave Monti tells me that the oil separator outputs got dumped into the exhaust augmentor. Perfect solution... the trash gets burned, not put back in the engine. Bill Hale Crankcase Distillation of Water by Air Oil Separators |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:32:26 GMT, Chris
wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 08:15:25 -0400, "Doodybutch" wrote: I am think of having one of these Air/Oil Separators installed on my R182 (Lycoming O-540) at annual this summer. I have a couple of questions: 1) Do they actually work and keep the oily mess off the bottom of the plane? 2) I think there are at least two different ones available - which is the best? 3) Are there any problems with them? Thanks, DB The following is an excerpt from Sacramento Skyranch's monthly newsletter (hopefully not breaking any copyright rules here). Quite an eye-opener on the whole Air/Oil Separator issue. The Sacramento Skyranch website is at www.sacskyranch.com and is full of very interesting info. I strongly disagree with them based on experience although with a bigger engine. I have the Deshannon air/oil seperator on my IO470N. I also use a preheater and once the temperature is cold enough to use it it stays on 24 X 7 except for when the plane is flying. The oil companies used to say not to do that. Now they say it's a good idea. course the engine compartment is also completely wrapped with two layers of the new space age blankets. The oil stays clear until near 20 hours. The cylinders look like they were polished on the insides. That and the ABS mechanic spoke highly of them. OTOH mine is mounted on the rear of the engine and that sucker gets hot. Like many things some swear by them and some swear at them. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Air Oil Separators like the Walker & BDS...
So I've thought that an interesting experiment would be to arrange a can to catch the liquid coming out of the separator... then go for a couple of flights and see what was in the can. On the Walker, one could modify it so the oil return drain stuck up into the bottom of the unit a bit; then add a separate drain at the very bottom, which would be for manually draining water. That might decant the oil. But the total amounts might overwhelm such a system. I wonder how much actually goes thru there on an average flight? It also seems to me that the wet vacuum pump should exhaust directly into the crankcase. That would provide a fresh air douche. Somewhere near the front would be good. As the famous chemist Cliff Hach mentioned awhile ago... "Hell, cars have had positive crankcase ventilation since 1932!" The water on the dipstick isn't a good thing. Cliff once measured the PH and found that it was TWO! Bill Hale |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 40 | October 3rd 08 03:13 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | December 2nd 04 07:00 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | June 2nd 04 07:17 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |