![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave wrote: This brings up an interesting question: Who has the right of way? Me, because I am already on the runway, ready to take off - or the traffic on approach, because it was "landing" (though had not so stated - only an "IFR Approach" called out). As it turned out, I held at the departure end, and the traffic declared a missed approach (perhaps having intended to do so all along?), and passed overhead. How close was he? If he's a few miles out you have no conflict, takeoff and turn. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-08-25, Bela P Havasreti wrote:
On CTAF: Announcing that you're "Clear of the active". You might think anyone who is waiting to take off can *see* when you're clear. You might, but you'd be wrong at some airports, like the one I fly out of. The only way you can see landing traffic clear the runway is if they make the last turnoff and you catch sight of the tip of their tail. The narrow taxiways and hills also make it useful for people to self- announce movement on the field. If you're going to the hangars from the fuel you don't want someone taking the first turnoff and coming nose-to-nose with you on the taxiway. -- Ben Jackson AD7GD http://www.ben.com/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dont use "active" at all. Here is why. A pilot approaches the pattern.
He turns his radio on. If all he hears is the other pilots are using the "active", he doesn't know which runway is in use. And he doesn't have to ask, if the pilots say the runway number instead of "active". |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug wrote:
Dont use "active" at all. Here is why. A pilot approaches the pattern. He turns his radio on. If all he hears is the other pilots are using the "active", he doesn't know which runway is in use. And he doesn't have to ask, if the pilots say the runway number instead of "active". Precisely my point. Even controllers usually don't use "taxi to the active", we're told "taxi to runway 2" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bela P. Havasreti" wrote in message
... Making 30+ second long position reports, 4500 feet over some non-descript / podunk town. More annoying when the broadcaster does so in broken english. Even more annoying when the broadcaster does so every 5 minutes! Even more annoying when the broadcaster neglects to mention what airport. "Ummmm...... Cessna 1...2...3....4....5 is um......... Turning left um............ Downwind............... um.......................... For the ummmm........... active runway........ um........ Cessna um..... 1.....2......3......4......5 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug makes and excellent point. The rest of you have brought up a
subject which get me too. I would rather a pilot would err on the side of caution than to not say anything and cause and serious upleasant situation. Perhaps more pilots should attend some wings programs and learn the proper techniques. Many pilots do not use proper terminology on the radio. Years ago, I was one of the worst on the radio. With study and proper training, I was able to overcome my short falls. In order, the three essentials to flying are Aviate .Navigate Communicate. I teach my students to think before they speak. Address with whom you desire communication. Announce who you are. Where you are. What you want. When you are at an uncontrolled airport, Announce the name of the airport at the beginning and also at the end of your transmission. These are the traditional and expected patter techniques. For more information on the subject, read Section 2 Radio Communications Phraseology and Techniques in the Aeronautical Information Manual. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Foley wrote:
"Bela P. Havasreti" wrote in message ... Making 30+ second long position reports, 4500 feet over some non-descript / podunk town. More annoying when the broadcaster does so in broken english. Even more annoying when the broadcaster does so every 5 minutes! Even more annoying when the broadcaster neglects to mention what airport. "Ummmm...... Cessna 1...2...3....4....5 is um......... Turning left um............ Downwind............... um.......................... For the ummmm........... active runway....... um........ Cessna um..... 1.....2......3......4......5 On 122.8 !!! =8^0 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Or the jet jockey jargon....
SlowPoke FBO SuperFast Jet N66666 SlowPoke FBO this is SuperFast Jet N66666 SlowPoke FBO this is SuperFast Jet N66666 how do you read? SlowPoke FBO this is SuperFast Jet N66666, co you copy SuperFast Jet N66666? Go ahead SuperFast Jet N66666 Hey there SlowPoke FBO, howyadoin?, this is SuperFast Jet N66666, we're about 50 miles out and will be there in about 10 minutes, we just wanted to let you know that we would be staying with ya a couple of days. (who freaking cares!) Roger SuperFast Jet N66666 we'll keep the light on. then a few minutes later it starts all over again with at 20 miles out or 10 miles out with Any traffic please watch out, or requests for phone calls, do you have a crew car, ect.... Hello? you're gonna land in 3 freaking minutes! Please hold your questions at least as long as you can hold your bladder! You could have made a phone call before you took off! Our local CTAF is 122.7 and there is another airport over 100 miles away also using 122.7 but has a lot of corporate jet traffic. The jet guys at that airport are pitiful. They start calling the FBO from ridiculous distances and altitudes with the dumbest comments and requests. Many absolutely do not matter. Is so and so working the desk? Great, I really like her.... What's for dinner? We won't need any fuel, we'll catch it tomorrow. It all leaves a very bad impression upon a student that's trying to get comfortable with what he IS supposed to say. Jim |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:20:16 -0500, Jim Burns wrote:
but has a lot of corporate jet traffic This is not limited to jet drivers. - Andrew |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On CTAF:
Announcing that you're "Clear of the active". You might think anyone who is waiting to take off can *see* when you're clear. The only exception I can think of is a (severely) crowned runway where the other end can't be seen from the departure end. Why would anyone say "clear of the active"? Is it a secret which runway you used? Do you want to withhold information from arriving pilots? Say clearly and boldy: "Podunk Traffic, Skylane 6 Delta Mike is clear of two eight, Podunk". "Area traffic, please advise" just slays me! Do you think a pilot needs to be requested to talk? How is "area traffic" different from "traffic"?????#$% Just give YOUR information. If another pilot thinks there may be a conflict, that other pilot will give THEIR information. I have a power-point presentation that I give at FAA Wings seminars in an attempt to clear this "lazy mouth and lazy brain" crap off the air. Best regards, Jer/ "Flight instruction and mountain flying are my vocations!" -- Jer/ (Slash) Eberhard, Mountain Flying Aviation, LTD, Ft Collins, CO CELL 970 231-6325 EMAIL jeratfrii.com http://users.frii.com/jer/ C-206 N9513G, CFII Airplane&Glider FAA-DEN Aviation Safety Counselor CAP-CO Mission&Aircraft CheckPilot BM218 HAM N0FZD 240 Young Eagles! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MX385 Radio removal | Marty from Florida | Owning | 3 | May 24th 13 08:26 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
I Hate Radios | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 9 | June 6th 05 05:39 PM |
1944 Aerial War Comes to Life in Radio Play | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | March 25th 04 10:57 PM |
Ham Radio In The Airplane | Cy Galley | Owning | 23 | July 8th 03 03:30 AM |