![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK pilots, try this one on for size. As you likely know, there is a wide
and growing rift between the career FAA bureaucrats (aka FAA Management) who run the monstrosity called the federal Air Traffic Organization, and the career FAA air traffic controllers who make that monstrosity work in the NAS on a daily basis. Regardless of where you stand on the politics of US air traffic control (funding, privatization, user-fees, labor issues, whatever), the ugly, on-going feud between Management and Labor in air traffic control may finally have reached a point where you as a pilot will be personally affected. This just in: *** Notice to all NATCA Bargaining Unit employees Please Post This notice is intended to advise all NATCA Bargaining Unit employees of recent occurrence in the Eastern Service Area. Controllers have been encouraged, through the actions of supervisors, to look the other way when it came to pilot deviations that did not result in a loss of separation. We have all heard supervisors say "no harm, no foul" on more than one occasion. Until now, this has not created problems for bargaining unit employees. Recently a facility in the Southern Region issued formal discipline (Letter of Reprimand) to a NATCA bargaining unit employee for failure to report a pilot deviation. An aircraft (Air Carrier) was told to hold short of a runway, read it back, and proceeded to go onto the runway. This resulted in a go-around with no loss of separation. In the reprimand, the manager acknowledged that the controller was in no way at fault operationally, but that he had violated an FAA order by not reporting the deviation, and as such, was being issued disciplinary action. During recent third level reviews, the Agency has held steadfast to their position. As your [NATCA title deleted], the only advice I can give you is to protect yourself and your career. Your failure to advise your supervisor of a pilot deviation may result in disciplinary action. Even if no loss of separation occurs. Inform your supervisor immediately if you witness a pilot deviation. Put the responsibility on their backs. Be warned!! Taking a "no harm, no foul" attitude with pilots could result in harm to yourself. *** Folks, I see at *least* one pilot deviation a week working traffic in my small slice of the NAS. I don't report them unless separation is lost, because I was trained under the "no harm, no foul" mentality. Pilots help controllers, controllers help pilots, and the NAS ticks along like an old clock. I'm not changing the way I do business, but I wanted you to know that other controllers might, in order to cover themsleves against antagonistic Management. Regards, Chip, ZTL |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|