![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The VOR-A at New Haven
(http://www.myairplane.com/databases/...s/00671VG2.PDF) has an MDA of 720, which is about 300 feet higher than the towers in the area. The VOR-2 (http://www.myairplane.com/databases/...s/00671VG2.PDF) gets you down to 380, and has to deal with the same towers. Why does it get to have an MDA 340 feet lower than the VOR-A? In fact, the VOR-A is almost perfectly lined up with runway 32; I don't see why it couldn't have been the VOR-32 with an MDA about 300 feet lower. Any of you TERPs-heads out there understand what's going on here? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High Price of Flying Wires? | PWK | Home Built | 34 | October 8th 17 08:24 PM |
Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! | Bruce A. Frank | Home Built | 1 | July 4th 04 07:28 PM |
high impedance, low impedance? | JFLEISC | Home Built | 5 | April 11th 04 06:53 AM |
MT. DIABLO HIGH SCHOOL CONCORD, CA PHOTOS | MT. DIABLO HIGH SCHOOL PHOTOS | Home Built | 1 | October 13th 03 03:35 AM |
High performance homebuilt in the UK | NigelPocock | Home Built | 0 | August 18th 03 08:35 PM |