![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi John:
Remember that your dummy load may not have the power rating of your Microair. I think your Microair is rated at 3 watts carrier and your dummy load may only be 1 watt. That will still work - but keep the test transmissions short - enough to get a useful reading. 10 second or so transmissions should be fine. Colin |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Generally, close is good enough. As Eric says, under 2:1 is probably fine.
A number of ham operators have impedance bridges or you can use a reflected power meter. However, before cussing at your antenna, be sure the meter is designed for the frequency range and is of good quality. The cb meters will not give you reliable readings here. If your swr is bad, or you are having communication problems, the connector is more likely the problem than the antenna. I have helped out on a number of installations and in almost every case the antenna failure is in one of the connectors. Remember, also, that if you place a metal object or wire in the close proximity of the antenna, it may affect the resonance. Colin |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
COLIN LAMB wrote:
Generally, close is good enough. As Eric says, under 2:1 is probably fine. A number of ham operators have impedance bridges or you can use a reflected power meter. However, before cussing at your antenna, be sure the meter is designed for the frequency range and is of good quality. The cb meters will not give you reliable readings here. It's measuring a ratio, not an absolute quantity, so they work just fine. Sure, the response is lower, but you calibrate the meter each time you use it, and that compensates for the response difference as well as the output power of the transmitter. That was the conclusion of a long thread on this a year or two ago. Radio Shack has them cheap enough, as do other places, so every pilot can own one, or know a pilot that does. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Although inexpensive bridges calibrated for one frequency or band can be
useful at a different frequency for comparative standing wave ratio measurement, I have found enough unreliable instruments to not trust them. If you compare them in the aviation band with a known meter, that is one thing - but trusting them off the shelf may give you a false reading. Many of the meters must zero the reading into a 50 ohm load at the frequency in question. That zero can vary with frequency. You can generally check the usefulness of the meter by doing two things. First, test the meter with a known 50 ohm dummy load at the frequency in question. It should read zero reflected power. Note the forward power or ratio. Then, reverse the leads. The same readings should be observed with the meter readings reversed. If not, the meter is not going to tell you the truth. Some excellent meters, like the Bird wattmeter, will work fine as an swr indicator far outside the design frequency, even though the power indication is off. Colin |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"ContestID67" wrote in
ups.com: As others have pointed out, presuming your antenna is "correct", its RF feed will have an impedance of 50ohms. Since the coax is also 50ohms, there will be no impedance mismatch, therefore no standing wave and VSWR=1. In practice there will be some non-ideal effects: - sharp bends in the coax will disturb its impedance - the antenna will only be "correct" at a single frequency. The antenna design and nearby objects determine the frequency band over which it is "correct enough" In practice, presuming you have a narrowband signal (say 5% of the carrier frequency) and the antenna is for that carrier frequency, I doubt that you will have much trouble. If you have trouble, how might it manifest itself? - the RF amp might blow up: that's your problem - the RF amp might become unstable and start transmitting on harmonic frequencies: that's everybody else's problem, and the regulatory authoratories can become unpleasantly interested (for very good reasons) Safest to: - get the correct antenna - measure the VSWR at the tx carrier frequency, and check it is within the RF amp's limits - ideally, use a spectrum analyser to check the level of the 2nd and 3rd harmonics I may be all wet on this subject as I am an electronics engineer (a bit pusher) and not an RF electrical engineer. Any comments? Unless you are using obsolete logic, you ought to know about RF effects! Consider that modern logic has sub-nanosecond rise and fall times, which is equivalent to frequencies above 1GHz. At such frequencies, PCB tracks are designed as RF transmission lines. Any more than 0.5" long have to be considered as transmission line stubs which will set up standing waves which will corrupt the digital signals. The result would be reduced operating margins and intermittent pattern-sensitive malfunctions. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One very minor point. As the feedline length increases, the coax loss will
cause the indicated swr to improve. The short length of the coax used makes this adjustment unimportant in most aircraft. Colin |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ContestID67" wrote in message ups.com... I have a question for this august body. I found a link on the 1-26 associations web site talking about the proper length of an antenna for operation at 123.3Mhz. This turns out to be; 1/4 wave Length: 0.61 m or 23.95 in 3/4 wave Length: 1.82 m or 71.84 in I was curious about the length of the coax. I was under the impression that to get the maximum power out of the antenna, that the combined total length of the coax *AND* the antenna needs to be taken into consideration and needs to be an even number of wavelengths. That prevents power from reflecting at the tip of the antenna and then back into the trasceiver. This can not only rob radiated power but might also damage the transceiver. A VSWR meter is used to tune this for maximum radiated power typically by adjusting the length of the antenna. I may be all wet on this subject as I am an electronics engineer (a bit pusher) and not an RF electrical engineer. Any comments? No. To get the most radiated power, the characteristic impedance of the antenna must match the characteristic impedance of the feedline. If the two impedances don't match, there will be a reflection of power from the ends of the feedline, setting up standing waves. If they're even reasonably close, the feedline length doesn't matter, other than the slight losses from additional length. In practice, you adjust the antenna to give a reasonably low SWR -- say, below 1.5 to 1 or so, and you're done. Probably more important than obsessing over SWR would be to make sure all the connections are good, solid connections, keeping the feedline well supported, and as short as is reasonable. Tim Ward KD6UTW |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I Hate Radios | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 9 | June 6th 05 05:39 PM |
LORAN antenna difference? | JFLEISC | Home Built | 6 | December 24th 04 10:10 PM |
Antenna ground plane and coax grounding | G. Fred McCutchen | Home Built | 2 | August 8th 04 12:27 PM |
ELT antenna -- Pitts | Al MacDonald | Home Built | 0 | July 15th 04 03:27 PM |
Yaesu/Vertex coax antenna adaptor | RM | Piloting | 15 | July 13th 04 09:32 PM |