![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 2, 1:39 am, "tscottme" wrote:
"kevmor" wrote in message oups.com... Our flight school CFIIs strongly suggested you bring your FAR/AIM to the oral and the ride. Look up any of the "trivia" you aren't sure about. When my applicants show up for a checkride, I have them bring a moving box full of all the books they used in training. However for interpreting the classic charts you really should have the coder sheets printed out and ready. -Robert |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Those black-and-white charts, beloved of the test writers in OKC, are slowly
going away. They are hard to find on the ADDS page as it is. Good riddance. The color charts are much easier to read. Bob Gardner "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 1, 8:41 pm, "kevmor" wrote: So my IR checkride is approaching, and the thing I'm the most sketchy on I think is the weather charts. I'm fine with TAF, METAR, and other textual, but I guess it's because I can't find all the exact same graphics on DUATS/DUAT that they use on the FAA exam (prognostic charts, etc). Even DUAT/DUATS show things slightly differently. How much is this going to be asked about on the checkride? Should I know every possible symbol for all those charts, or is getting a general idea and then calling 800-WX-BRIEF good enough? For your checkride, your DE will likely require you to show him the "classic" charts. Radar Summary, Surface Analysis, Constant Pressure, Weather Depiction). Since pilots only use these charts on checkrides, there are somewhat hidden on aviationweather.gov. Try http://aviationweather.gov/std_brief/ -Robert, CFII |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 2, 9:36 am, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:
On Feb 1, 10:37 pm, "Jim Macklin" Once rated, few pilots every use these old style charts. -Robert, CFII The few, the proud, the... I use the weather depiction and radar summary, among numerous other weather products, every day. They are fantastic! http://aviationweather.gov/std_brief/ ak. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 2, 10:55 am, "Bob Gardner" wrote:
Those black-and-white charts, beloved of the test writers in OKC, are slowly going away. They are hard to find on the ADDS page as it is. Good riddance. The color charts are much easier to read. Bob Gardner Here 'ya go Bob! http://aviationweather.gov/std_brief/ I, for one, hope they don't go away! ak. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Most of the DEs I know have their own collection of old
charts that they "know" and that do show some weather. Most students today will have a full text and graphics print of the on-line briefing in all formats. "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... | On Feb 1, 10:37 pm, "Jim Macklin" | wrote: | Know how to interpret the material from on-line sources. | The key is, can you draw a crude picture of the weather | [verbally or with a pencil] and then apply that to the FAR | as to whether the weather, currently and forecast, will | allow the operation. | | Partly, but every DE I've ever worked with required the applicant to | show up with the classic charts and exhibit knowledge of the symbols | (i.e. carry a secret decoder ring). Once rated, few pilots every use | these old style charts. | | -Robert, CFII | |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know how to find them, I just think that they aren't as good as the
color/interactive charts. Bob wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 2, 10:55 am, "Bob Gardner" wrote: Those black-and-white charts, beloved of the test writers in OKC, are slowly going away. They are hard to find on the ADDS page as it is. Good riddance. The color charts are much easier to read. Bob Gardner Here 'ya go Bob! http://aviationweather.gov/std_brief/ I, for one, hope they don't go away! ak. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 2, 10:55 am, "Bob Gardner" wrote:
Those black-and-white charts, beloved of the test writers in OKC, are slowly going away. They are hard to find on the ADDS page as it is. Good riddance. The color charts are much easier to read. Those charts probably made sense in the days of walking into the FSS and looking at B&W printouts. Nowadays with computers we have less official products that are so much better. -Robert |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Macklin wrote:
Know how to interpret the material from on-line sources. The key is, can you draw a crude picture of the weather [verbally or with a pencil] and then apply that to the FAR as to whether the weather, currently and forecast, will allow the operation. You are not becoming a weather briefer or a professional chart maker. Nor a meterologists. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 07:55:21 -0500, Roy Smith wrote:
"Jim Macklin" wrote: Know how to interpret the material from on-line sources. The key is, can you draw a crude picture of the weather [verbally or with a pencil] and then apply that to the FAR as to whether the weather, currently and forecast, will allow the operation. When I was doing my training (early 90's), I found studying the chart material very difficult, for two reasons. First, the charts they showed you in the study guides were badly reproduced, sometimes to the point of When I took the written (on computer) they used low res *EGA* monitors. I could not read the charts as presented or even the text identifiers on those screens. Those were the only questions I missed. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 02/02/07 19:15, Roger wrote:
On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 07:55:21 -0500, Roy Smith wrote: "Jim Macklin" wrote: Know how to interpret the material from on-line sources. The key is, can you draw a crude picture of the weather [verbally or with a pencil] and then apply that to the FAR as to whether the weather, currently and forecast, will allow the operation. When I was doing my training (early 90's), I found studying the chart material very difficult, for two reasons. First, the charts they showed you in the study guides were badly reproduced, sometimes to the point of When I took the written (on computer) they used low res *EGA* monitors. I could not read the charts as presented or even the text identifiers on those screens. Those were the only questions I missed. I took my tests on computer as well, but was provided with the associated booklet which contained all the graphics. This was in 2004/5. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Instrument Checkride passed (Long) | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | February 11th 05 02:41 AM |
Prepping for IR checkride - questions | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 25 | January 3rd 05 03:59 AM |
Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long) | Alan Pendley | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | December 16th 04 02:16 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 02:31 PM |
IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 09:03 PM |