A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Aerodynamics acording to Myth Busters!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 31st 07, 10:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 790
Default Aerodynamics acording to Myth Busters!

"cavelamb himself" wrote in message
link.net...
...
But those webbed tailgate thingies have GOT to increase drag.

Don't they???

Richard


OK, Following up on on old thread.

I spent the day working in an automotive wind tunnel today, and I thought to
ask the operator if he had tried tailgate up / down in the tunnel.

He said they did a bunch of tests on an F150 and found that a tonnau cover
was best, a cap was nearly as good, tailgate up was better than down (I
forget if there was a difference between down and removed) and the web
things were the worst.

With the tailgate up, when they used smoke, the smoke would go over the roof
and then come down and touch the top of the tailgate.

--
Geoff
The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com
remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail
When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate.


  #2  
Old November 1st 07, 08:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Denny
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 562
Default Aerodynamics acording to Myth Busters!

On Oct 31, 6:17 pm, "Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" The Sea Hawk at wow way
d0t com wrote:
"cavelamb himself" wrote in message

link.net...
...

But those webbed tailgate thingies have GOT to increase drag.


Don't they???


Richard


OK, Following up on on old thread.

I spent the day working in an automotive wind tunnel today, and I thought to
ask the operator if he had tried tailgate up / down in the tunnel.

He said they did a bunch of tests on an F150 and found that a tonnau cover
was best, a cap was nearly as good, tailgate up was better than down (I
forget if there was a difference between down and removed) and the web
things were the worst.

With the tailgate up, when they used smoke, the smoke would go over the roof
and then come down and touch the top of the tailgate.

--
Geoff
The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com
remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail
When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate.


Jeez, there goes my excuse for not fixing the broken latch on the
tailgate... I hate it when that happens...

denny

  #3  
Old November 1st 07, 08:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Aerodynamics acording to Myth Busters!


"Denny" wrote

Jeez, there goes my excuse for not fixing the broken latch on the
tailgate... I hate it when that happens...


Ahh, don't sweat it too much.

A couple bungee chords will do just fine. g
--
Jim in NC


  #4  
Old November 4th 07, 06:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
J.Kahn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 120
Default Aerodynamics acording to Myth Busters!

Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe wrote:
"cavelamb himself" wrote in message
link.net...
...
But those webbed tailgate thingies have GOT to increase drag.

Don't they???

Richard


OK, Following up on on old thread.

I spent the day working in an automotive wind tunnel today, and I thought to
ask the operator if he had tried tailgate up / down in the tunnel.

He said they did a bunch of tests on an F150 and found that a tonnau cover
was best, a cap was nearly as good, tailgate up was better than down (I
forget if there was a difference between down and removed) and the web
things were the worst.

With the tailgate up, when they used smoke, the smoke would go over the roof
and then come down and touch the top of the tailgate.

--
Geoff
The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com
remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail
When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate.


I work on the RJ program and it was once explained to me, in a
discussion of devices to slow airflow in ducts, that a wire mesh
structure has far more drag and will create a much larger and more
permanent (longer lasting effect downstream) drop in velocity than a
single obstruction, even if the single obstruction is much larger. In
our case, a nozzle type restrictor used on the cockpit air duct had a
fraction of the effect on velocity downstream, that the mesh screen at
the outlet had, and was basically useless. So it's easy to see how
those tailgate screens are the worst thing to do for drag.

John
  #5  
Old July 24th 07, 03:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,232
Default Aerodynamics acording to Myth Busters!

cavelamb himself wrote:

It is more fuel efficient to drive a pick-up truck with its tailgate
down, rather than up.

Busted

Driving with the tailgate down actually increased drag on the pick-up
and caused it to consume fuel faster than the identical truck driven
with the tailgate up. It was later revealed that the closed tailgate
creates a locked vortex flow that created a smoother flow of air over
the truck. With the tailgate down, the trapped vortex was dissipated and
the drag increased.




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBus...%29#Blown_Away


I remember seeing a wind tunnel test on this many years ago (I think in
the late 70s when I was an aerospace engineering student) long before
Mythbusters existed. However, there is no way you can convince some
people that this is a myth. They will argue to the death that they gain
mileage with the tailgate down, however, the wind tunnel tests were very
conclusive. A rotating vortex is established in the truck once you get
above a fairly slow speed (I think 30 MPH or so) and this acts almost
like a large balloon in the bed of the truck and directs the airflow
over the tailgate. You can see this pretty easily from the smoke in the
wind tunnel and the drag change was noticeable also.

Not only do you not get better mileage with the tailgate down ... you
actually get worse mileage! Then again, most people can't even check
their MPG correctly...


Matt
  #6  
Old July 24th 07, 05:20 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Richard Isakson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 68
Default Aerodynamics acording to Myth Busters!

"Matt Whiting" wrote ...
cavelamb himself wrote:

It is more fuel efficient to drive a pick-up truck with its tailgate
down, rather than up.

Busted

Driving with the tailgate down actually increased drag on the pick-up
and caused it to consume fuel faster than the identical truck driven
with the tailgate up. It was later revealed that the closed tailgate
creates a locked vortex flow that created a smoother flow of air over
the truck. With the tailgate down, the trapped vortex was dissipated and
the drag increased.




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBus...%29#Blown_Away


I remember seeing a wind tunnel test on this many years ago (I think in
the late 70s when I was an aerospace engineering student) long before
Mythbusters existed. However, there is no way you can convince some
people that this is a myth. They will argue to the death that they gain
mileage with the tailgate down, however, the wind tunnel tests were very
conclusive. A rotating vortex is established in the truck once you get
above a fairly slow speed (I think 30 MPH or so) and this acts almost
like a large balloon in the bed of the truck and directs the airflow
over the tailgate. You can see this pretty easily from the smoke in the
wind tunnel and the drag change was noticeable also.

Not only do you not get better mileage with the tailgate down ... you
actually get worse mileage! Then again, most people can't even check
their MPG correctly...


Matt


YMMV!

Rich


  #7  
Old July 25th 07, 01:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Denny
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 562
Default Aerodynamics acording to Myth Busters!

On Jul 24, 12:20 am, "Richard Isakson" wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote ...





cavelamb himself wrote:


It is more fuel efficient to drive a pick-up truck with its tailgate
down, rather than up.


Busted


Driving with the tailgate down actually increased drag on the pick-up
and caused it to consume fuel faster than the identical truck driven
with the tailgate up. It was later revealed that the closed tailgate
creates a locked vortex flow that created a smoother flow of air over
the truck. With the tailgate down, the trapped vortex was dissipated and
the drag increased.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBus...%29#Blown_Away


I remember seeing a wind tunnel test on this many years ago (I think in
the late 70s when I was an aerospace engineering student) long before
Mythbusters existed. However, there is no way you can convince some
people that this is a myth. They will argue to the death that they gain
mileage with the tailgate down, however, the wind tunnel tests were very
conclusive. A rotating vortex is established in the truck once you get
above a fairly slow speed (I think 30 MPH or so) and this acts almost
like a large balloon in the bed of the truck and directs the airflow
over the tailgate. You can see this pretty easily from the smoke in the
wind tunnel and the drag change was noticeable also.


Not only do you not get better mileage with the tailgate down ... you
actually get worse mileage! Then again, most people can't even check
their MPG correctly...


Matt


YMMV!

Rich- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Paper material in the bed of my truck at 55mph rotates once or trwice
in that standing vortex then vanishes over the tailgate - never to be
seen again...
Any empty, plastic gas can left against the tailgate slides up against
the back of the cab - again that standing vortex...
Now, that the gate up has less drag overal still amazes me, in spite
of knowing what is theoretically happening...

denny

  #8  
Old July 25th 07, 08:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default Aerodynamics acording to Myth Busters!


"Denny" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Jul 24, 12:20 am, "Richard Isakson" wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote ...





cavelamb himself wrote:


It is more fuel efficient to drive a pick-up truck with its tailgate
down, rather than up.


Busted


Driving with the tailgate down actually increased drag on the

pick-up
and caused it to consume fuel faster than the identical truck driven
with the tailgate up. It was later revealed that the closed tailgate
creates a locked vortex flow that created a smoother flow of air

over
the truck. With the tailgate down, the trapped vortex was dissipated

and
the drag increased.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBus...%29#Blown_Away


I remember seeing a wind tunnel test on this many years ago (I think

in
the late 70s when I was an aerospace engineering student) long before
Mythbusters existed. However, there is no way you can convince some
people that this is a myth. They will argue to the death that they

gain
mileage with the tailgate down, however, the wind tunnel tests were

very
conclusive. A rotating vortex is established in the truck once you

get
above a fairly slow speed (I think 30 MPH or so) and this acts almost
like a large balloon in the bed of the truck and directs the airflow
over the tailgate. You can see this pretty easily from the smoke in

the
wind tunnel and the drag change was noticeable also.


Not only do you not get better mileage with the tailgate down ... you
actually get worse mileage! Then again, most people can't even check
their MPG correctly...


Matt


YMMV!

Rich- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Paper material in the bed of my truck at 55mph rotates once or trwice
in that standing vortex then vanishes over the tailgate - never to be
seen again...
Any empty, plastic gas can left against the tailgate slides up against
the back of the cab - again that standing vortex...
Now, that the gate up has less drag overal still amazes me, in spite
of knowing what is theoretically happening...

denny

I, for one, am not convinced that a p/u has less drag with the gate
closed--although I concede that many trucks may gain a trivial benefit at
some particular speed.

Their are just too many variables; including the shape of the cab, shape of
the nose, slope of the windshield, and length of the bed; to draw any
meaningful concludions from just one or two tests. In addition, the vortex
grows in size with increasing speed--so that the forward moving portion will
be nearer the back of the cab at lower speeds and may be aft of the tailgate
at very high speeds. However, a radically sloped nose and windshield may
cause the vortex to be much longer front to back at all speeds; the the
lengths of the cab and bed will have an effect.

If I had to wager on the outcome of a *real* test of this issue, I would
guess that there would be a slight drag reduction (on average) with the
tailgate down or removed--especailly if there is any cross wind--and that a
bed cover (a/k/a tonneau) would do at least as well under *all* conditions.

In any case, if you choose to run with the gate open or off, be sure to
secure your load! About 20 years ago, I personally watched a driver lose a
P&W Wasp Jr when he forgot it was there and mashed the accelerator. That
was a major "ah, darn"!

Just my $0.02
Peter



  #9  
Old July 26th 07, 04:19 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
OldPhart
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Aerodynamics acording to Myth Busters!


"Peter Dohm" wrote in message
...
|
| "Denny" wrote in message
| ups.com...
| On Jul 24, 12:20 am, "Richard Isakson" wrote:
| "Matt Whiting" wrote ...
|
|
|
|
|
| cavelamb himself wrote:
|
| It is more fuel efficient to drive a pick-up truck with its
tailgate
| down, rather than up.
|
| Busted
|
| Driving with the tailgate down actually increased drag on the
| pick-up
| and caused it to consume fuel faster than the identical truck
driven
| with the tailgate up. It was later revealed that the closed
tailgate
| creates a locked vortex flow that created a smoother flow of
air
| over
| the truck. With the tailgate down, the trapped vortex was
dissipated
| and
| the drag increased.
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBus...%29#Blown_Away

|
| I remember seeing a wind tunnel test on this many years ago (I
think
| in
| the late 70s when I was an aerospace engineering student) long
before
| Mythbusters existed. However, there is no way you can convince
some
| people that this is a myth. They will argue to the death that
they
| gain
| mileage with the tailgate down, however, the wind tunnel tests
were
| very
| conclusive. A rotating vortex is established in the truck once
you
| get
| above a fairly slow speed (I think 30 MPH or so) and this acts
almost
| like a large balloon in the bed of the truck and directs the
airflow
| over the tailgate. You can see this pretty easily from the
smoke in
| the
| wind tunnel and the drag change was noticeable also.
|
| Not only do you not get better mileage with the tailgate down
.... you
| actually get worse mileage! Then again, most people can't even
check
| their MPG correctly...
|
| Matt
|
| YMMV!
|
| Rich- Hide quoted text -
|
| - Show quoted text -
|
| Paper material in the bed of my truck at 55mph rotates once or
trwice
| in that standing vortex then vanishes over the tailgate - never to
be
| seen again...
| Any empty, plastic gas can left against the tailgate slides up
against
| the back of the cab - again that standing vortex...
| Now, that the gate up has less drag overal still amazes me, in spite
| of knowing what is theoretically happening...
|
| denny
|
| I, for one, am not convinced that a p/u has less drag with the gate
| closed--although I concede that many trucks may gain a trivial benefit
at
| some particular speed.
|
| Their are just too many variables; including the shape of the cab,
shape of
| the nose, slope of the windshield, and length of the bed; to draw any
| meaningful concludions from just one or two tests. In addition, the
vortex
| grows in size with increasing speed--so that the forward moving
portion will
| be nearer the back of the cab at lower speeds and may be aft of the
tailgate
| at very high speeds. However, a radically sloped nose and windshield
may
| cause the vortex to be much longer front to back at all speeds; the
the
| lengths of the cab and bed will have an effect.
|
| If I had to wager on the outcome of a *real* test of this issue, I
would
| guess that there would be a slight drag reduction (on average) with
the
| tailgate down or removed--especailly if there is any cross wind--and
that a
| bed cover (a/k/a tonneau) would do at least as well under *all*
conditions.
|
| In any case, if you choose to run with the gate open or off, be sure
to
| secure your load! About 20 years ago, I personally watched a driver
lose a
| P&W Wasp Jr when he forgot it was there and mashed the accelerator.
That
| was a major "ah, darn"!
|
| Just my $0.02
| Peter


This issue came up on the Toyota PU site some time back. One of the
references was a university study that clearly showed that the mileage
was better with the tail gate up. Here is a link showing no meaningful
difference- http://www.scangauge.com/support/tailgate.shtml

The university study also tested bed covers and bed caps. The best
mileage was obtained with a cap that was cab high and had a rounded rear
end that blended into the tailgate.

While searching I found that in some states running with the tailgate
down is technically against the law.

--
OldPhart



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #10  
Old July 27th 07, 02:57 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Ernest Christley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 199
Default Aerodynamics acording to Myth Busters!

Peter Dohm wrote:

I, for one, am not convinced that a p/u has less drag with the gate
closed--although I concede that many trucks may gain a trivial benefit at
some particular speed.


Why is it so hard to believe. You have seperated flow, and seperated
flow equals high drag. Put the tailgate down and you have one huge drag
chute in the form of the cab. Put the gate up, and you get an air dam
in front of the gate that sort of creates an airfoil from the top of the
cab to the top of the gate. You've still got a big drag chute, just not
as big as before.

Someone smarter than me said that how you meet the air isn't as
important as how you leave it.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Myth: 1 G barrel rolls are impossible. Jim Logajan Piloting 244 June 22nd 07 04:33 AM
Dispelling the Myth: Hillary Clinton and the Purple Heart Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 February 21st 06 05:41 AM
dam busters Hamisha3 Military Aviation 48 February 26th 04 11:17 PM
cheap, durable, homebuilt aircrafts- myth or truth? -=:|SAJAN|:=- Home Built 27 January 8th 04 09:05 AM
The myth that won't die. Roger Long Piloting 7 December 19th 03 06:15 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.