![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I found this from US News and World Report:
The joystick war Run from afar, Predators and other spy gear signal a new era of remote-control warfare By Richard J. Newman Early in the Iraq war, an unmanned Predator surveillance plane captured live video of an Iraqi Roland surface-to-air missile on the ground north of Baghdad. Since the missile threatened U.S. aircraft--and was mobile and easy to hide--air commanders called for a quick airstrike. They directed a nearby A-10 warplane to ready its laser-guided bombs, while the Predator itself prepared to guide those bombs onto the target with its laser designator. Such "buddy lasing" is a common targeting tactic. But this time there was one notable difference: The pilot operating the Predator was sitting in a trailer at an American air base, 7,000 miles away. http://www.usnewsclassroom.com/issue...news/19air.htm "TJ" wrote in message ... "Guy Alcala" And perhaps more importantly, Iraq among others operated them. At least, they were operational and used during DS, although how operational they'd remain after a decade of sanctions is arguable. Guy The Iraqi's still continued to fire Roland at Coalition manned and unmanned aircraft operating in the NFZs. I've seen 2002 footage of a Roland launch against a Predator in the SNFZ. Numerous Rolands and associated vehicles have been found since the fall of Baghdad. TJ |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
TJ wrote:
"Guy Alcala" And perhaps more importantly, Iraq among others operated them. At least, they were operational and used during DS, although how operational they'd remain after a decade of sanctions is arguable. Guy The Iraqi's still continued to fire Roland at Coalition manned and unmanned aircraft operating in the NFZs. I've seen 2002 footage of a Roland launch against a Predator in the SNFZ. Numerous Rolands and associated vehicles have been found since the fall of Baghdad. Thanks for the info. One wonders if the Roland is just fairly reliable, they had lots of spares, they cannibalized a lot, and/or they were able to get replacements around the sanctions. Anyone know what the "use-by" shelf life of the Roland missile is? Guy |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do you think Iraq could substitute a missile of their own?
Guy Alcala wrote in message ... TJ wrote: "Guy Alcala" And perhaps more importantly, Iraq among others operated them. At least, they were operational and used during DS, although how operational they'd remain after a decade of sanctions is arguable. Guy The Iraqi's still continued to fire Roland at Coalition manned and unmanned aircraft operating in the NFZs. I've seen 2002 footage of a Roland launch against a Predator in the SNFZ. Numerous Rolands and associated vehicles have been found since the fall of Baghdad. Thanks for the info. One wonders if the Roland is just fairly reliable, they had lots of spares, they cannibalized a lot, and/or they were able to get replacements around the sanctions. Anyone know what the "use-by" shelf life of the Roland missile is? Guy |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
miso wrote:
Do you think Iraq could substitute a missile of their own? I doubt it, but I'm open to persuasion. Can anyone comment on the relative difficulty of solid versus liquid-fuel production, and on whether the old missiles can be re-grained safely (safe by Iraq under Saddam standards, that is)? Guy |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Guy Alcala" wrote in message
. .. miso wrote: Do you think Iraq could substitute a missile of their own? I doubt it, but I'm open to persuasion. Can anyone comment on the relative difficulty of solid versus liquid-fuel production, and on whether the old missiles can be re-grained safely (safe by Iraq under Saddam standards, that is)? Guy Although I lack the full details, and the people in question do not want to talk at all, I'm meanwhile sure that the French delivered all sorts of support equipment and technical documentation for Rolands to Iraq and then some. At the time of the system's introduction in Iraq (late 1980, early 1981), they were doing everything possible to support the deployment of the system and also use every little success in combat (at some point Aerospatiale even started publishing cards depicting all the possible engagements and the ways Rolands scored): I mean, they were really hot about making Roland in Iraq a success and gaining as much profit from this fact as possible. So hot that initially even missiles and equipment directly from NATO stocks were delivered. Together with other of their suppliers (East Germans, Brazilians etc.) the Iraqis became pretty proficient on the field of rocket motors and propellants too, while purchasing also the licence for prouction of several different - mainly French - radars. By 1990 they were really able of doing things all by themselves. Now, the shots of the Rolands captured by the US and British troops earlier this year in Iraq do not show them in really a "top" condition (which is interesting and contradictive, given that the ADC was getting far more attention by the regime than the IrAF already since years, and most of the IrAF figthers captured were actually in excellent condition), but they were functional. So, I'd say it's 2+2=4 here. Tom Cooper Co-Author: Iran-Iraq War in the Air, 1980-1988: http://www.acig.org/pg1/content.php and, Iranian F-4 Phantom II Units in Combat: http://www.osprey-publishing.co.uk/t...hp/title=S6585 |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Guy Alcala" wrote in message . .. miso wrote: Do you think Iraq could substitute a missile of their own? I doubt it, but I'm open to persuasion. Can anyone comment on the relative difficulty of solid versus liquid-fuel production, and on whether the old missiles can be re-grained safely (safe by Iraq under Saddam standards, that is)? I can't comment about the technical questions, but, AFAIK, the French were hot to get the Roland into the gear in Iraq at the time (1980s), and have delivered everything they could, including technical documentation, complete support infra-structure, for the System. Their Aerospatiale went even so far to publish cards depicting successful engagements against British (during the Falklands War) and Iranian aircraft by the Rolands. The Iraqis have also got the licence for production of numerous French-made radars. On the other side, by the late 1980s the Iraqis have got a pretty capable industry of rocket motors, foremost thanks to their cooperation with Brazilians, Yugs, and East Germans. The US troops captured quite a number of Rolands (of course, most of these in their sealed containers), in March and April this year: most were not the best looking, but almost all were functioning. So, I'd say, it could be that in this case 2+2 is ineed 4. Tom Cooper Co-Author: Iran-Iraq War in the Air, 1980-1988: http://www.acig.org/pg1/content.php and, Iranian F-4 Phantom II Units in Combat: http://www.osprey-publishing.co.uk/t...hp/title=S6585 |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nellis Air Show Nov. 15-16 | Rich S. | Home Built | 4 | October 9th 03 06:31 PM |
Nellis? Hpw come....? | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 17 | July 30th 03 08:31 PM |
Who plays golf at Nellis? | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 35 | July 27th 03 12:24 AM |
Nellis on the blocks? | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 15 | July 26th 03 03:24 AM |
Nellis on the Blocks (The upcoming 2005 Base Realignment And Closure) | CFA3 | Military Aviation | 25 | July 23rd 03 04:47 AM |