![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Frank Ch. Eigler" wrote in message
... "Al G" writes: A friend has recently updated his C210's avionics with a largely Garmin panel. Among the things removed was a King RDS81 weather radar. [...] have to figure out how to get it there from Oregon, as safely as possible. [...] The R/T is probably 12" x 12", and weighs about 15 lbs.[...] The thought makes me squirm. What some here may not realize is how fragile the radar antenna can be. There is a sticker on mine (old King RDR160) that warns against even *touching* the movable parts. I would not risk plain old packing peanuts or bubble wrap, if the box being held sideways or upside down causes a load upon these parts. http://web.elastic.org/~fche/gallery..._4423.jpg.html - FChE If that is really the case, which is quite possible, then the OP would be faced with the prospect of engineering a real shipping crate within a crate--or of renting one. If renting, the radar manufacturer might be a source. Alternatively, the may have shipping instructions available. It has now been about 20 years since I have handled this type of equipement, although I have shipped a few computers since; but, to the best of my recollection, the flat panel (slotted waveguide) antennas were much less fragile than the parabolic antennas. However, with either type, the most correct method of packing is to mount the intenna to the inside of one wall of a rigid crate. The crate can then be placed inside a larger bax and cushioned with bubble wrap, popcorn, etc. While the cushioning material should not be overly compressed, it sould not be loose either--especially if you use something like popcorn--or the inner box may be resting on the botom by the time you bring it to the counter! My experiences were always good with FedEx, Airborne, and RedBall. I am sorry that no other such names come readily to mind. Peter |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Judah wrote: [...] What some here may not realize is how fragile the radar antenna can be. [...] I would not risk plain old packing peanuts or bubble wrap, if the box being held sideways or upside down causes a load upon these parts. What happens in turbulence? Clearly, it can handle that, but then it has only a few ounces/decagrams of mass (the fragile mast in the middle) to move along. If one tries to push the ten-pound magnetron/etc. disc through the mast, a hundred times as much force would pass through the part. - FChE |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank Ch. Eigler" wrote in message ... Judah wrote: [...] What some here may not realize is how fragile the radar antenna can be. [...] I would not risk plain old packing peanuts or bubble wrap, if the box being held sideways or upside down causes a load upon these parts. What happens in turbulence? Clearly, it can handle that, but then it has only a few ounces/decagrams of mass (the fragile mast in the middle) to move along. If one tries to push the ten-pound magnetron/etc. disc through the mast, a hundred times as much force would pass through the part. So it sounds like mounting the radar to a piece of plywood, or something, (like it is mounted on an airplane) and fastening that in a box, then surrounding it with peanuts would be the right thing to do, no? -- Jim in NC |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually (a) the OP said he wanted to ship the RT unit and the display;
never said a frikkin' word about the antenna and (b) I'm not sure where Eigler gets his information that the antenna is delicate. Having worked directly with civilian aircraft weather radar for a long time, I have absolutely no idea where Eigler is coming from and (c) nobody ever said a word about packing a maggie directly on top of a delicate part. Separate boxes come to mind unless you want argument for argument's sake. Jim -- "If you think you can, or think you can't, you're right." --Henry Ford "Morgans" wrote in message ... "Frank Ch. Eigler" wrote in message ... Judah wrote: [...] What some here may not realize is how fragile the radar antenna can be. [...] I would not risk plain old packing peanuts or bubble wrap, if the box being held sideways or upside down causes a load upon these parts. What happens in turbulence? Clearly, it can handle that, but then it has only a few ounces/decagrams of mass (the fragile mast in the middle) to move along. If one tries to push the ten-pound magnetron/etc. disc through the mast, a hundred times as much force would pass through the part. So it sounds like mounting the radar to a piece of plywood, or something, (like it is mounted on an airplane) and fastening that in a box, then surrounding it with peanuts would be the right thing to do, no? -- Jim in NC |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RST Engineering" writes: Actually (a) the OP said he wanted to ship the RT unit and the display; never said a frikkin' word about the antenna It seems your broad experience has excluded radar units like my old RDR-160 where the RT and antenna are actually nailed together into one unit. and (b) I'm not sure where Eigler gets his information that the antenna is delicate. [...] Jim, I spelled out precisely where I got the information. From a manufacturer's warning sticker right on the antenna. - FChE |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RST Engineering" wrote in message ... Actually (a) the OP said he wanted to ship the RT unit and the display; never said a frikkin' word about the antenna My apologies, Jim, I thought the existance of the antenna was implied. This unit consists of two parts, the display in the aircraft, and the unit under the wing. The base unit that mounts to the pod is fairly rigged, but the slotted dish doesn't look like it would support much weight. I'm concerned about the unit getting tipped over, and landing on the antenna in the box. I'm sure that the base unit can support the antenna, which only weighs grams, like it does in turbulence, but I'm trying to avoid any situation where the antenna has to support the base unit that weighs about 15lbs. I've checked with our King dealer, in Troutdale, and all they will tell me is that they use a box from Honeywell. I've asked for a contact or part number or something, but got no reply. Roseburg isn't a big town, and doesn't have a Kinko's, but I think we have a package express, or something. Al G |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Al G" writes: Actually (a) the OP said he wanted to ship the RT unit and the display; never said a frikkin' word about the antenna My apologies, Jim, I thought the existance of the antenna was implied. There is no need to apologize. Jim was rude and overconfident of his mistaken information. This unit consists of two parts [...] Indeed, as a few seconds' googling shows, and there are several other "two-piece" radar systems. - FChE |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
B A R R Y wrote:
"RST Engineering" wrote: Do NOT ship UPS. Those *******s will find a way to screw up the process one way or another, and we ship two to three hundred packages a year. Good advice for packing. As another data point, our bike shop's experience is exactly the opposite for the two shipping companies mentioned. Same here, Fedex today dropped off a package, never rang the bell or knocked on the door and left without a signature... And they always do that, even leaving packages outside or in the rain... UPS on the other hand always wants to tell me hello (and probably to get something cool to drink)... |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Darrel Toepfer" wrote in message
. 18... B A R R Y wrote: "RST Engineering" wrote: Do NOT ship UPS. Those *******s will find a way to screw up the process one way or another, and we ship two to three hundred packages a year. Good advice for packing. As another data point, our bike shop's experience is exactly the opposite for the two shipping companies mentioned. Same here, Fedex today dropped off a package, never rang the bell or knocked on the door and left without a signature... And they always do that, even leaving packages outside or in the rain... UPS on the other hand always wants to tell me hello (and probably to get something cool to drink)... An FYI: You can contact FedEx and always require a signature (or hold) on packages destined for your address. I do that because I have (on a semi-regular basis) have high-value packages... -- Doug Semler, MCPD a.a. #705, BAAWA. EAC Guardian of the Horn of the IPU (pbuhh). The answer is 42; DNRC o- Gur Hfrarg unf orpbzr fb shyy bs penc gurfr qnlf, abbar rira erpbtavmrf fvzcyr guvatf yvxr ebg13 nalzber. Fnq, vfa'g vg? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
shipping glider to NZ-advice on securing glider in trailer | November Bravo | Soaring | 6 | November 1st 06 02:05 PM |
Europe to NA shipping | ADK | Soaring | 0 | April 29th 06 12:29 AM |
FS: Garmin 196 $550 + Shipping | Daniel L. Lieberman | Products | 0 | April 22nd 05 04:33 PM |
Integrating onboard weather radar data with satellite-fed Doppler radar | [email protected] | General Aviation | 3 | January 9th 05 08:57 PM |
Shipping cost | Gralmk | Restoration | 3 | December 15th 03 04:45 AM |