![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 27, 3:13*am, D Ramapriya wrote:
On Jul 27, 10:36*am, Dudley Henriques wrote: Probably sucked in during post-landing taxi to the apron from the previous flight? Ramapriya Nope. Saw the child who did it, although didn't actually see him do it. He was being carried by his father on the line at one of our show sites in 1971. Have used the incident in a hundred safety lectures on pre-flights. I had preflighted the airplane for my next display and had run across the ramp to grab a coke from a snack wagon. Saw the man and his kid before I left. Came back and re-preflighted the airplane again because it was out of my direct sight since I had done the last one. Caught the bear in the carb tunnel on the second preflight. Rule number ONE for display pilots, and for all pilots for that matter as far as I'm concerned anyway! ANYTIME the airplane is out of your sight for ANY reason after you have done a preflight inspection, do it again! Dudley Henriques Nice story ![]() If only the two pilots on that fateful Aeroperu 603 had done one, 70 souls + an entire company + a nice 757 would all still have been alive and functional. Ramapriya When it comes to flying and one's attitude about flying, a pilot is well advised to remember the immortal words of race driver Tom Sneva, who after hitting the wall at Indy at 200 plus, was asked by a reporter as he was walking back to his pit if he would like to be able to enter that turn again and do it right the next time. Sneva looked at the man and said, "If if's and buts were candy and nuts, we'd all have a Merry Christmas" DH |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, D Ramapriya wrote: Has any of you has ever discovered something during the pre-flight inspection that necessitated a significant deferrment of your flight plan or a cancelation altogether? Just curious, that's all. Depends on what counts as "significant deferrment" and what counts as "pre-flight". I've been delayed by an hour or so a couple of times, and had to cancel once because of a rough engine during the run-up (turned out to be lead fouling on the plugs, but we didn't find that out until the following day). The delays were caused by a sheared bolt on a wheel faring, and prop nick that had to be filed down. Those are the ones I can remember offhand. rg |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 27, 11:04*am, Ron Garret wrote:
In article , *D Ramapriya wrote: Depends on what counts as "significant deferrment" and what counts as "pre-flight". By pre-flight, I meant that bit which you do ere stepping into the flight deck - I thought there's not much ambiguity on what constitutes pre-flight? ![]() Something like a 2-hour delay, purely as an upshot of what you discovered during the pre-flight inspection, was what I had in mind by significant deferrment. *I've been delayed by an hour or so a couple of times, and had to cancel once because of a rough engine during the run-up Correct me if I'm wrong but engine runups are part of the mechanics' pre-handover (of the aircraft) routine, right? It's after that that the aircraft is towed on to the ramp and delivered to the pilots. I've only ever seen runups being performed near uninhabited areas outside hangars. Ramapriya |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:26:02 -0700 (PDT), D Ramapriya
wrote: On Jul 27, 11:04*am, Ron Garret wrote: In article , *D Ramapriya wrote: Depends on what counts as "significant deferrment" and what counts as "pre-flight". By pre-flight, I meant that bit which you do ere stepping into the flight deck - I thought there's not much ambiguity on what constitutes pre-flight? ![]() Something like a 2-hour delay, purely as an upshot of what you discovered during the pre-flight inspection, was what I had in mind by significant deferrment. *I've been delayed by an hour or so a couple of times, and had to cancel once because of a rough engine during the run-up Correct me if I'm wrong but engine runups are part of the mechanics' pre-handover (of the aircraft) routine, right? It's after that that the aircraft is towed on to the ramp and delivered to the pilots. I've only ever seen runups being performed near uninhabited areas outside hangars. Ramapriya this is recreational.aviation.piloting. just about all of us do our own runnups because we dont employ mechanics. they are done just before takeoff. do you do things differently where you live???? Stealth Pilot |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 27, 3:21*pm, Stealth Pilot
wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong but engine runups are part of the mechanics' pre-handover (of the aircraft) routine, right? It's after that that the aircraft is towed on to the ramp and delivered to the pilots. I've only ever seen runups being performed near uninhabited areas outside hangars. Ramapriya this is recreational.aviation.piloting. just about all of us do our own runnups because we dont employ mechanics. they are done just before takeoff. do you do things differently where you live???? Stealth Pilot I guess I got my wires crossed in a way, as a pilot friend kindly pointed out to me in private :\ I was thinking of the everyday scene that I see en route home, in the Emirates hangars at a spot circa here http://wikimapia.org/#lat=25.2653253...3&z=17&l=0&m=b where some aircraft's engines get runup every other day by mechanics standing around. Ramapriya |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, D Ramapriya wrote: On Jul 27, 3:21*pm, Stealth Pilot wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong but engine runups are part of the mechanics' pre-handover (of the aircraft) routine, right? It's after that that the aircraft is towed on to the ramp and delivered to the pilots. I've only ever seen runups being performed near uninhabited areas outside hangars. Ramapriya this is recreational.aviation.piloting. just about all of us do our own runnups because we dont employ mechanics. they are done just before takeoff. do you do things differently where you live???? Stealth Pilot I guess I got my wires crossed in a way, as a pilot friend kindly pointed out to me in private :\ I was thinking of the everyday scene that I see en route home, in the Emirates hangars That is indeed a very different world. rg |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"D Ramapriya" wrote in message
... On Jul 27, 3:21 pm, Stealth Pilot wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong but engine runups are part of the mechanics' pre-handover (of the aircraft) routine, right? It's after that that the aircraft is towed on to the ramp and delivered to the pilots. I've only ever seen runups being performed near uninhabited areas outside hangars. Ramapriya this is recreational.aviation.piloting. just about all of us do our own runnups because we dont employ mechanics. they are done just before takeoff. do you do things differently where you live???? Stealth Pilot I guess I got my wires crossed in a way, as a pilot friend kindly pointed out to me in private :\ I was thinking of the everyday scene that I see en route home, in the Emirates hangars at a spot circa here http://wikimapia.org/#lat=25.2653253...3&z=17&l=0&m=b where some aircraft's engines get runup every other day by mechanics standing around. Ramapriya -----------------new post begins--------- You appear to have been looking at maintenance runups of large turbojet powered aircraft, which whould typically be run up following some types of work having been performed--rather than prior to each flight. OTOH, propeller driven aircraft, especially those with reciprocating engines and magneto ignition, are usually run up prior to each flight--or at a minimum prior to the first flight of each day. That may change within the foreseeable future, as FADEC systems replace the manual mixture controls and the traditional dual magnetos--so that computer diagnostics can be continuously available without the need for the pilot to conduct a series of tests and measurements. Then, only the propeller governor would remain on those aircraft with neither fixed pitch propellers nor single lever engine controls. Peter |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:04:45 -0700, Ron Garret wrote:
Depends on what counts as "significant deferrment" and what counts as "pre-flight". Which begs this question. How bad does a wood prop have to be to cancel a flight? I was going to take a flight in a DA20 which has a twin blade Sensenich W69EK7-63 wood propeller. On pre-flight, the prop was chipped in several places, no runs but then its painted or enameled white. http://www.controller.com/images/Con...e/80614723.jpg The edges were so rough I was concerned about catching a splinter. I passed. And you? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Gezellig wrote: On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:04:45 -0700, Ron Garret wrote: Depends on what counts as "significant deferrment" and what counts as "pre-flight". Which begs this question. How bad does a wood prop have to be to cancel a flight? I was going to take a flight in a DA20 which has a twin blade Sensenich W69EK7-63 wood propeller. On pre-flight, the prop was chipped in several places, no runs but then its painted or enameled white. http://www.controller.com/images/Con...e/80614723.jpg The edges were so rough I was concerned about catching a splinter. I passed. And you? I'm not a propellor sort of guy, but rough enough to catch a splinter would be a definite no-go for me! Being that messed up sounds like a potential structural problem to me. I'd bet that it's *probably* just cosmetic, but I hate to bet on probablies. Having a blade suddenly fail would ruin your whole day.... -- Mike Ash Radio Free Earth Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:39:29 -0400, Mike Ash wrote:
In article , Gezellig wrote: On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:04:45 -0700, Ron Garret wrote: Depends on what counts as "significant deferrment" and what counts as "pre-flight". Which begs this question. How bad does a wood prop have to be to cancel a flight? I was going to take a flight in a DA20 which has a twin blade Sensenich W69EK7-63 wood propeller. On pre-flight, the prop was chipped in several places, no runs but then its painted or enameled white. http://www.controller.com/images/Con...e/80614723.jpg The edges were so rough I was concerned about catching a splinter. I passed. And you? I'm not a propellor sort of guy, but rough enough to catch a splinter would be a definite no-go for me! Being that messed up sounds like a potential structural problem to me. I'd bet that it's *probably* just cosmetic, but I hate to bet on probablies. Having a blade suddenly fail would ruin your whole day.... Dave added: That would be a pass for me! I would stop right there...... For a friend here.... he passed on 3 spinner cracks on a rental 172. One crack was 1 1/2 in long. They (others) continued to fly the aircraft for another week before the spinner was removed Dave Thanks, guys, I was really shocked as the local CFI had no problemo with this prop which was on a student trainer. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
annual inspections | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | October 20th 07 01:08 AM |
100 Hour Inspections | Judah | Piloting | 26 | December 1st 06 02:30 PM |
Homebuilt Inspections | john smith | Home Built | 8 | December 25th 04 02:20 PM |
Time Measurement for Inspections | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 15 | April 7th 04 05:26 AM |
Pre-buy inspections | Paul Folbrecht | Owning | 12 | March 1st 04 12:27 AM |