A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Lidle crash: who is wrong?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 12th 06, 12:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Lidle crash: who is wrong?

I'm just trying to understand what happened. Looked at the
Google sat photo, the soccer field looked like the best and
closest landing area. Not really sure if the locations is
totally correct. All I know for sure is that the news media
hires idiots who can fill hours with nothing.

I do know from experience that winds around the buildings
can cause lots of turbulence which could cause control
problems.

Just where the airplane was when the problem began is
unknown, all we know for sure is where it ended up.

All my flying in the NYC area has been in King Air and
Beechjet aircraft, have not run the VFR corridors. Don't
have a current chart and not sure what they did and what the
rules are. Anybody know of a free download for a terminal
NYC chart that shows the area in question?



"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
. ..
| "Jim Macklin" wrote
in message
| news:YLhXg.2547$XX2.2048@dukeread04...
| Google for "524 e 72nd st.,new york city" and look at
the
| sat photo. There is a soccer field just northeast
across
| the river. IF they were having some engine problem,
that
| could have looked like the best place to land. Passing
the
| tops of the buildings and with probable winds aloft
being
| twice as strong as surface winds [maybe 25 kts. ] and
the
| venturi effect, the plane could have easily been turned
| directly into the building. Just a guess.
|
| I don't understand your scenario. They'd have been flying
north along the
| east shore of the narrow river, then making a U-turn to
fly south along the
| west shore. Aside from the river itself, plausible nearby
landing sites are
| along the east shore and on the island in the middle of
the river; I don't
| see how heading for those sites would have led them to
crash on the west
| side of the river. (Plus, there was no distress call or
other indication of
| engine problems.)
|
| If they flew too fast, making the turn too wide (which is
my guess), they'd
| have hit the north side of a building on the west
shore--which they did.
|
| --Gary
|
|
|
|
| "Blasto" wrote in message
|
ups.com...
| | Confusing reports on the Lidle crash-- Mayor
Bloomberg,
| sounding
| | utterly confident in his sources, says the plane took
off
| from
| | Teterboro, circled the Statue of Liberty, flew up
| (south-to-north) the
| | East River, then into the building. A few minutes
earlier,
| a CNN
| | reporter using PASSUR asserted that after taking off
the
| plane tracked
| | straight west-to-east over Central Park, turned right
and
| followed the
| | East River (north-to-south) and suddenly banked right
into
| the
| | building. Given that the impact was on the building's
| north face, the
| | latter account seems more likely.
| |
| | Anyone have newer info?
| |
| | --
| | B
| |
|
|
|
|


  #2  
Old October 12th 06, 12:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gary Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 252
Default Lidle crash: who is wrong?

"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
news:4ApXg.2566$XX2.1045@dukeread04...
All my flying in the NYC area has been in King Air and
Beechjet aircraft, have not run the VFR corridors. Don't
have a current chart and not sure what they did and what the
rules are. Anybody know of a free download for a terminal
NYC chart that shows the area in question?


http://skyvector.com/


  #3  
Old October 12th 06, 03:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Lidle crash: who is wrong?

Thanks
"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
. ..
| "Jim Macklin" wrote
in message
| news:4ApXg.2566$XX2.1045@dukeread04...
| All my flying in the NYC area has been in King Air and
| Beechjet aircraft, have not run the VFR corridors.
Don't
| have a current chart and not sure what they did and what
the
| rules are. Anybody know of a free download for a
terminal
| NYC chart that shows the area in question?
|
| http://skyvector.com/
|
|


  #4  
Old October 12th 06, 01:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Roy Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 478
Default Lidle crash: who is wrong?

"Jim Macklin" wrote:

Anybody know of a free download for a terminal
NYC chart that shows the area in question?


http://skyvector.com/
  #5  
Old October 12th 06, 01:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 603
Default Lidle crash: who is wrong?

"Jim Macklin" wrote:

Anybody know of a free download for a terminal
NYC chart that shows the area in question?


http://aviationtoolbox.org/raw_data/...20TAC%2069.tif
(31MB)


  #6  
Old October 12th 06, 03:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Lidle crash: who is wrong?

Thanks again.
"Roy Smith" wrote in message
...
| "Jim Macklin"
wrote:
|
| Anybody know of a free download for a terminal
| NYC chart that shows the area in question?
|
| http://skyvector.com/


  #7  
Old October 12th 06, 03:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Marco Leon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 319
Default Lidle crash: who is wrong?

Gary Drescher wrote:

I don't understand your scenario. They'd have been flying north along the
east shore of the narrow river, then making a U-turn to fly south along the
west shore. Aside from the river itself, plausible nearby landing sites are
along the east shore and on the island in the middle of the river; I don't
see how heading for those sites would have led them to crash on the west
side of the river. (Plus, there was no distress call or other indication of
engine problems.)

If they flew too fast, making the turn too wide (which is my guess), they'd
have hit the north side of a building on the west shore--which they did.

--Gary


Also, the winds were coming from ENE gusting to 22. Going northbound on
the west fork of the East River and making a lefthand turn, the turning
radius would be significantly wider. This would have contributed to the
"surprise" factor as well (not unlike the typical overshooting the
final in a crosswind situation).

Marco

  #8  
Old October 12th 06, 08:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
EridanMan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 208
Default Lidle crash: who is wrong?

To the pilots who fly the area regularly-

That turn looks to me like it needs to be handled as a base-final
turn... get flaps out 10 (maybe even 25) and stabalized at ~60 knots
(my pa28-140 speeds), and make a nice crisp pattern turn (I know, most
pattern turns are 90 then 90, but you get my drift).

Is this a safe assessment?

An A.net guy calculated his speed based on the returns, he was doing
almost 120 knots up the east river until immediately before the turn,
then he abruptly slowed to 90... we were wondering if he would have had
time to get the plane stabalized before initiating the turn.

At that point, all he needed was a bit of poor pilotage (something I
myself must admit too on occasion)- he initiates a tight turn too
quickly, does not hold enough back preassure on the yoke, finds himself
suddenly in a skyscraper forest, panics- firewall the throttle and turn
hard to avoid a looming monolith in front of him... stall... and
physics does the rest.

Blasto wrote:
Confusing reports on the Lidle crash-- Mayor Bloomberg, sounding
utterly confident in his sources, says the plane took off from
Teterboro, circled the Statue of Liberty, flew up (south-to-north) the
East River, then into the building. A few minutes earlier, a CNN
reporter using PASSUR asserted that after taking off the plane tracked
straight west-to-east over Central Park, turned right and followed the
East River (north-to-south) and suddenly banked right into the
building. Given that the impact was on the building's north face, the
latter account seems more likely.

Anyone have newer info?

--
B


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Doubts raised in jet crash Dave Butler Piloting 8 July 26th 05 01:25 AM
update on Montrose crash Bob Moore Piloting 3 November 29th 04 02:38 PM
Homemade plane crash Big John Home Built 9 October 17th 03 06:45 PM
Glider/Skydiving Crash dm Soaring 0 September 27th 03 05:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.