![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm just trying to understand what happened. Looked at the
Google sat photo, the soccer field looked like the best and closest landing area. Not really sure if the locations is totally correct. All I know for sure is that the news media hires idiots who can fill hours with nothing. I do know from experience that winds around the buildings can cause lots of turbulence which could cause control problems. Just where the airplane was when the problem began is unknown, all we know for sure is where it ended up. All my flying in the NYC area has been in King Air and Beechjet aircraft, have not run the VFR corridors. Don't have a current chart and not sure what they did and what the rules are. Anybody know of a free download for a terminal NYC chart that shows the area in question? "Gary Drescher" wrote in message . .. | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | news:YLhXg.2547$XX2.2048@dukeread04... | Google for "524 e 72nd st.,new york city" and look at the | sat photo. There is a soccer field just northeast across | the river. IF they were having some engine problem, that | could have looked like the best place to land. Passing the | tops of the buildings and with probable winds aloft being | twice as strong as surface winds [maybe 25 kts. ] and the | venturi effect, the plane could have easily been turned | directly into the building. Just a guess. | | I don't understand your scenario. They'd have been flying north along the | east shore of the narrow river, then making a U-turn to fly south along the | west shore. Aside from the river itself, plausible nearby landing sites are | along the east shore and on the island in the middle of the river; I don't | see how heading for those sites would have led them to crash on the west | side of the river. (Plus, there was no distress call or other indication of | engine problems.) | | If they flew too fast, making the turn too wide (which is my guess), they'd | have hit the north side of a building on the west shore--which they did. | | --Gary | | | | | "Blasto" wrote in message | ups.com... | | Confusing reports on the Lidle crash-- Mayor Bloomberg, | sounding | | utterly confident in his sources, says the plane took off | from | | Teterboro, circled the Statue of Liberty, flew up | (south-to-north) the | | East River, then into the building. A few minutes earlier, | a CNN | | reporter using PASSUR asserted that after taking off the | plane tracked | | straight west-to-east over Central Park, turned right and | followed the | | East River (north-to-south) and suddenly banked right into | the | | building. Given that the impact was on the building's | north face, the | | latter account seems more likely. | | | | Anyone have newer info? | | | | -- | | B | | | | | | |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
news:4ApXg.2566$XX2.1045@dukeread04... All my flying in the NYC area has been in King Air and Beechjet aircraft, have not run the VFR corridors. Don't have a current chart and not sure what they did and what the rules are. Anybody know of a free download for a terminal NYC chart that shows the area in question? http://skyvector.com/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks
"Gary Drescher" wrote in message . .. | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | news:4ApXg.2566$XX2.1045@dukeread04... | All my flying in the NYC area has been in King Air and | Beechjet aircraft, have not run the VFR corridors. Don't | have a current chart and not sure what they did and what the | rules are. Anybody know of a free download for a terminal | NYC chart that shows the area in question? | | http://skyvector.com/ | | |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Macklin" wrote:
Anybody know of a free download for a terminal NYC chart that shows the area in question? http://skyvector.com/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Macklin" wrote:
Anybody know of a free download for a terminal NYC chart that shows the area in question? http://aviationtoolbox.org/raw_data/...20TAC%2069.tif (31MB) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks again.
"Roy Smith" wrote in message ... | "Jim Macklin" wrote: | | Anybody know of a free download for a terminal | NYC chart that shows the area in question? | | http://skyvector.com/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary Drescher wrote:
I don't understand your scenario. They'd have been flying north along the east shore of the narrow river, then making a U-turn to fly south along the west shore. Aside from the river itself, plausible nearby landing sites are along the east shore and on the island in the middle of the river; I don't see how heading for those sites would have led them to crash on the west side of the river. (Plus, there was no distress call or other indication of engine problems.) If they flew too fast, making the turn too wide (which is my guess), they'd have hit the north side of a building on the west shore--which they did. --Gary Also, the winds were coming from ENE gusting to 22. Going northbound on the west fork of the East River and making a lefthand turn, the turning radius would be significantly wider. This would have contributed to the "surprise" factor as well (not unlike the typical overshooting the final in a crosswind situation). Marco |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To the pilots who fly the area regularly-
That turn looks to me like it needs to be handled as a base-final turn... get flaps out 10 (maybe even 25) and stabalized at ~60 knots (my pa28-140 speeds), and make a nice crisp pattern turn (I know, most pattern turns are 90 then 90, but you get my drift). Is this a safe assessment? An A.net guy calculated his speed based on the returns, he was doing almost 120 knots up the east river until immediately before the turn, then he abruptly slowed to 90... we were wondering if he would have had time to get the plane stabalized before initiating the turn. At that point, all he needed was a bit of poor pilotage (something I myself must admit too on occasion)- he initiates a tight turn too quickly, does not hold enough back preassure on the yoke, finds himself suddenly in a skyscraper forest, panics- firewall the throttle and turn hard to avoid a looming monolith in front of him... stall... and physics does the rest. Blasto wrote: Confusing reports on the Lidle crash-- Mayor Bloomberg, sounding utterly confident in his sources, says the plane took off from Teterboro, circled the Statue of Liberty, flew up (south-to-north) the East River, then into the building. A few minutes earlier, a CNN reporter using PASSUR asserted that after taking off the plane tracked straight west-to-east over Central Park, turned right and followed the East River (north-to-south) and suddenly banked right into the building. Given that the impact was on the building's north face, the latter account seems more likely. Anyone have newer info? -- B |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Doubts raised in jet crash | Dave Butler | Piloting | 8 | July 26th 05 01:25 AM |
update on Montrose crash | Bob Moore | Piloting | 3 | November 29th 04 02:38 PM |
Homemade plane crash | Big John | Home Built | 9 | October 17th 03 06:45 PM |
Glider/Skydiving Crash | dm | Soaring | 0 | September 27th 03 05:13 PM |