![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
Well, if the payroll costs of 300 employees averaged $25/each, Columbia will have saved $7,500 for a five-day layoff. I'm not sure about the costs of laying them off and bringing them back to work, are you? The reduction in employee morale will cost far more than $7500 in lost future productivity. Happy Flying! Scott Skylane |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:33:34 -0800, Scott Skylane
wrote in : Larry Dighera wrote: Well, if the payroll costs of 300 employees averaged $25/each, Columbia will have saved $7,500 for a five-day layoff. I'm not sure about the costs of laying them off and bringing them back to work, are you? The reduction in employee morale will cost far more than $7500 in lost future productivity. Perhaps. Or productivity might be increased by only calling back the productive employees. Then, while moral may not be increased, an employee's will to remain employed may spur her to increased production. Who knows? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:33:34 -0800, Scott Skylane
wrote: The reduction in employee morale will cost far more than $7500 in lost future productivity. While it may be a stretch, I look at it this way: Columbia may have laid them off based on a view that the problem would take much longer to fix than it did. At this point, they could choose to pay the affected employees or possibly provide some other perk to improve morale. Or, they could do nothing. It will be interesting to see what happens. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Skylane" wrote in message ... Larry Dighera wrote: Well, if the payroll costs of 300 employees averaged $25/each, Columbia will have saved $7,500 for a five-day layoff. I'm not sure about the costs of laying them off and bringing them back to work, are you? The reduction in employee morale will cost far more than $7500 in lost future productivity. Like people in the aerospace industry aren't used to these things? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:40:21 -0500, "Neil Gould" wrote in : Recently, Larry Dighera posted: GARMIN RESOLVES G1000 ISSUE, MANUFACTURERS RELIEVED (http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#195978) A problem that stalled shipments of Garmin G1000 avionics last week (), affecting deliveries of some piston aircraft, has been resolved, Garmin said on Monday. Garmin has resumed shipments of the GRS 77 AHRS (Attitude Heading Reference System) units, which were the cause of the snafu, used in G1000 installations. "All affected aircraft manufacturers will begin receiving GRS 77 units immediately so that they can resume aircraft deliveries," Garmin said. Production of the GRS 77 will increase incrementally as Garmin ramps up the production line. The AHRS problem was caused by a production process change by a component supplier, Garmin said. http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#195978 Thanks for the update, Larry. It seems to me that Columbia's layoff may cost them more than if they simply retained the employees for the duration. Neil Well, if the payroll costs of 300 employees averaged $25/each, Columbia will have saved $7,500 for a five-day layoff. I'm not sure about the costs of laying them off and bringing them back to work, are you? Where do employees in the USA work for $25 for five days??? I think Henry Ford paid $4/day nearly 100 years ago. :-) Most places in the USA have fully burdened labor costs of at least $50/hours. For five days this is $2,000. For 300 employees, this is $600,000 which isn't chump change. Matt |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:20:20 GMT, Matt Whiting
wrote in : Well, if the payroll costs of 300 employees averaged $25/each, Columbia will have saved $7,500 for a five-day layoff. I'm not sure about the costs of laying them off and bringing them back to work, are you? Where do employees in the USA work for $25 for five days??? I thought that figure looked suspect. I was estimating that the payroll cost may be about $25/hr. At that rate it would work out to $300,000 using an eight hour work shift. Thanks for calling my error to my attention. I think Henry Ford paid $4/day nearly 100 years ago. :-) Ford is an apt analogy; he wouldn't put doors on the rest rooms, so that his employees didn't waste too much time in there, from what I've read. Most places in the USA have fully burdened labor costs of at least $50/hours. For five days this is $2,000. For 300 employees, this is $600,000 which isn't chump change. Matt Agreed. That's about the price of twenty SR22s. Customers get a five day delivery delay, and Columbia gets half a ~$million. Smooth. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Garmin G1000 gets airways | Dan Luke[_2_] | Piloting | 30 | August 11th 07 03:19 PM |
Garmin G1000 gets airways | Dan Luke[_2_] | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 11th 07 03:19 PM |
Mooney goes with Garmin G1000 | Mike Rapoport | Owning | 4 | February 15th 04 01:03 AM |
Garmin G1000 | Corky Scott | Home Built | 4 | January 9th 04 06:57 AM |
Garmin G1000 | Foster | Owning | 2 | July 20th 03 06:45 PM |