![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 14, 11:07 am, Mxsmanic wrote:
But doesn't this mean that he'll ultimately fly longer? He may not be thrilled over the short term, but it means five extra years at the peak of his career. MX, I usually dont respond to your posts, but I am thinking there may be others with the same question. You have to consider that most pilots dont WANT to fly longer. In the states, people typically retire at 65. How would you like to be told that you will have to work an extra 5 years to get your benifits ? The typical DB and DC plans are geared toward a full career and a pilot takes a hit if he retires early.Typically 2.5 to 5% per year. Most of us would rather make captains pay 5 years earlier so the money in our DC plans and 401Ks has that much longer to grow, not to mention the B funds (for those who still have them). The job is not as easy as it looks, a pilot is away from home more and more, it gets harder to recover from jetlag, there is alot of industry volitility, etc. I am in my mid 40s and I cringe at the thought of doing this job in my mid 60s. Most of us would rather hit that peak 5 years earlier . |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
F. Baum writes:
MX, I usually dont respond to your posts, but I am thinking there may be others with the same question. You have to consider that most pilots dont WANT to fly longer. I thought people become airline pilots because they love to fly. In the states, people typically retire at 65. How would you like to be told that you will have to work an extra 5 years to get your benifits? Depends on whether or not I'm getting the same deal as everyone else. If it's 65 for everyone else, and mine is raised from 60 to 65 as well, I can't really complain. The job is not as easy as it looks, a pilot is away from home more and more, it gets harder to recover from jetlag, there is alot of industry volitility, etc. I am in my mid 40s and I cringe at the thought of doing this job in my mid 60s. Most of us would rather hit that peak 5 years earlier. But as you say, people typically retire at 65, so why should pilots get to retire five years earlier? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: F. Baum writes: MX, I usually dont respond to your posts, but I am thinking there may be others with the same question. You have to consider that most pilots dont WANT to fly longer. I thought people become airline pilots because they love to fly. No you didn't Bertie |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 16, 8:30 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote : F. Baum writes: MX, I usually dont respond to your posts, but I am thinking there may be others with the same question. You have to consider that most pilots dont WANT to fly longer. I thought people become airline pilots because they love to fly. No you didn't Mixed up claiming he thinks eh.... bad choice of words |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
george wrote in
: On Dec 16, 8:30 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Mxsmanic wrote : F. Baum writes: MX, I usually dont respond to your posts, but I am thinking there may be others with the same question. You have to consider that most pilots dont WANT to fly longer. I thought people become airline pilots because they love to fly. No you didn't Mixed up claiming he thinks eh.... bad choice of words If he only made yes /no posts he'd still have less than a 10% chance of being right. Bertie |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 15, 2:02 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
I thought people become airline pilots because they love to fly. Most do, although if you do anything long enough you'll get tired of it eventually. Like reading your moronic responses. The job is not as easy as it looks, a pilot is away from home more and more, it gets harder to recover from jetlag, there is alot of industry volitility, etc. I am in my mid 40s and I cringe at the thought of doing this job in my mid 60s. Most of us would rather hit that peak 5 years earlier. But as you say, people typically retire at 65, so why should pilots get to retire five years earlier? Until last week, pilots didn't "get" to retire five years earlier - they had no choice. Have you read through this thread at all? Dope. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 15, 12:03 pm, "F. Baum" wrote:
Best of luck with the career goals. Stay far away from charter if you can help it. FB Thanks. Not real big on charter jobs, huh? I figgered I'd do it for a few years then try to get a fractional gig. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kingfish" wrote in message ... Most do, although if you do anything long enough you'll get tired of it eventually. Like reading your moronic responses. Why do you read his responses? |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
F. Baum wrote:
The reason why SWA, Jetblue, Airtran, etc, wanted a change to the rule is because they do not offer their pilots any kind of benifits package. Really, none at all? http://www.southwest.com/careers/benefits.html |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 17, 8:59 am, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote: Most do, although if you do anything long enough you'll get tired of it eventually. Like reading your moronic responses. Why do you read his responses? 'Cause I can't figure out how to block them with my reader? I usually just ignore him, but find meself feeling rather grouchy this morning and got sucked into the MX vortex of stupidity... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TSA rule, what does this mean? | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 27 | April 21st 07 02:54 AM |
OT Message rule???? | Tri-Pacer | Piloting | 9 | February 16th 07 04:43 AM |
New TSA Rule | NW_PILOT | Piloting | 18 | October 27th 04 12:35 AM |
New TSA Rule | G.R. Patterson III | Piloting | 0 | October 23rd 04 04:12 PM |
51% rule | Robert Bates | Home Built | 12 | August 1st 03 09:06 PM |