![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was an early (and remain a) strong supporter of the OLC - gave the
first OLC presentation to the Seattle Glider Council (SGC) - for stimulating growth in cross-country soaring. Check-out the increase in SGC participation over the life of the OLC! As a Cambridge 20 user, I lament the end of OLC support. However, I do not want to replace my Cambridge 20 - L-NAV - PDA with Glide Navigator II installation. Getting ready to make my wish list for Santa and would appreciate recommendations for a back-up system that will likely remain compatible with the OLC system. Thanks in advance. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy,
I've been using XCSoar running on my Android phone. It works great for OLC, and Santa will be happy beacuse it's free (if you have an Android device). Somebody mentioned on here that OLC won't score an XC Soar generated IGC file for "OLC League" (I think). I'm not sure about this because I've never tried it. But for logging flight, posting to OLC, and getting scored it works great. --Stefan On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 11:59:54 -0600, Roy Clark, "B6" wrote: I was an early (and remain a) strong supporter of the OLC - gave the first OLC presentation to the Seattle Glider Council (SGC) - for stimulating growth in cross-country soaring. Check-out the increase in SGC participation over the life of the OLC! As a Cambridge 20 user, I lament the end of OLC support. However, I do not want to replace my Cambridge 20 - L-NAV - PDA with Glide Navigator II installation. Getting ready to make my wish list for Santa and would appreciate recommendations for a back-up system that will likely remain compatible with the OLC system. Thanks in advance. -- Stefan Murry |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 3, 10:59*am, "Roy Clark, \"B6\"" wrote:
I was an early (and remain a) strong supporter of the OLC - gave the first OLC presentation to the Seattle Glider Council (SGC) *- *for stimulating growth in cross-country soaring. *Check-out the increase in SGC participation over the life of the OLC! As a Cambridge 20 user, I lament the end of OLC support. *However, I do not want to replace my Cambridge 20 - L-NAV - PDA with Glide Navigator II installation. Getting ready to make my wish list for Santa and would appreciate recommendations for a back-up system that will likely remain compatible with the OLC system. Thanks in advance. The stand-alone flywithce recorder is very small and very inexpensive, and it works for OLC. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 3, 12:45*pm, Bob wrote:
On Dec 3, 10:59*am, "Roy Clark, \"B6\"" wrote: I was an early (and remain a) strong supporter of the OLC - gave the first OLC presentation to the Seattle Glider Council (SGC) *- *for stimulating growth in cross-country soaring. *Check-out the increase in SGC participation over the life of the OLC! As a Cambridge 20 user, I lament the end of OLC support. *However, I do not want to replace my Cambridge 20 - L-NAV - PDA with Glide Navigator II installation. Getting ready to make my wish list for Santa and would appreciate recommendations for a back-up system that will likely remain compatible with the OLC system. Thanks in advance. The stand-alone flywithce recorder is very small and very inexpensive, and it works for OLC. I believe just about every flight computer software generates an OLC compatible IGC file, unless you fly a motorglider and need ENL (workaround is to claim as pure glider with the same handicap instead...) Ramy |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 3, 11:08*pm, Ramy wrote:
On Dec 3, 12:45*pm, Bob wrote: On Dec 3, 10:59*am, "Roy Clark, \"B6\"" wrote: I was an early (and remain a) strong supporter of the OLC - gave the first OLC presentation to the Seattle Glider Council (SGC) *- *for stimulating growth in cross-country soaring. *Check-out the increase in SGC participation over the life of the OLC! As a Cambridge 20 user, I lament the end of OLC support. *However, I do not want to replace my Cambridge 20 - L-NAV - PDA with Glide Navigator II installation. Getting ready to make my wish list for Santa and would appreciate recommendations for a back-up system that will likely remain compatible with the OLC system. Thanks in advance. The stand-alone flywithce recorder is very small and very inexpensive, and it works for OLC. I believe just about every flight computer software generates an OLC compatible IGC file, unless you fly a motorglider and need ENL (workaround is to claim as pure glider with the same handicap instead...) Ramy- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - hi Roy I think the power flarm is an igc approved logger???????????? 4Q |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 3, 12:59*pm, "Roy Clark, \"B6\"" wrote:
I was an early (and remain a) strong supporter of the OLC - gave the first OLC presentation to the Seattle Glider Council (SGC) *- *for stimulating growth in cross-country soaring. *Check-out the increase in SGC participation over the life of the OLC! As a Cambridge 20 user, I lament the end of OLC support. *However, I do not want to replace my Cambridge 20 - L-NAV - PDA with Glide Navigator II installation. Getting ready to make my wish list for Santa and would appreciate recommendations for a back-up system that will likely remain compatible with the OLC system. Thanks in advance. Check out SoarPilot (http://soaringpilot.org/). It's free and has known OLC support/registration. It runs natively on any Palm OS product (best is a Tungsten T/Magellan GPS Companion combination), but will run on any Windows PDA using StyleTap. Best of all it is free and is very well supported. Regards, Frank (TA) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I borrowed a Nano as a backup for Uvalde Glide and was impressed with
its simple operation. The Colibri II seems to also be a good option, though neither are "cheap". The Colibri is currently on sale as they clear stock. Any of these should be nearly a direct replacement for the LX20. Inexpensive alternatives are as mentioned above - most of the current PDA software will generate files acceptable for IGC (GNII is an exception) and all you need is the GPS source, which you already have with the LX20. Cheers, Derek |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks to all who have or still will reply.
I'm not interested is changing my current cell phone nor my current Cambridge 20 - L-Nav - Ipaq running GN II software system. The Nano seems the easiest of the options so far. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 4, 2:53*pm, "Roy Clark, \"B6\"" wrote:
Thanks to all who have or still will reply. I'm not interested is changing my current cell phone nor my current Cambridge 20 - L-Nav - Ipaq running GN II software system. The Nano seems the easiest of the options so far. if all you need is a logger to make something to upload to the OLC then you should go with the FlywithCE. Easy on/off button and that is all there is to the operation. $120 or so through various vendors. Nano will come in handy though if you want to go for a world record, which your Cambridge cannot do. Otherwise you could find something more productive to do with the extra $400 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 3, 11:59*am, "Roy Clark, \"B6\"" wrote:
As a Cambridge 20 user, I lament the end of OLC support. *However, I do not want to replace my Cambridge 20 - L-NAV - PDA with Glide Navigator II installation. What does "end of OLC support" mean? Now or in the near future? I show at http://www.onlinecontest.org/olc-2.0/OLC-recorder.pdf that the CAI20 is approved. This seems odd that OLC doesn't like the CAI20 because the IGC approved list shows the CAI20 as approved for "Badges (all)" which is defined as, "Badges (all) - This applies to types of Recorders that do not fulfil the Specification in some areas at the time of approval. However, it has been decided that they may be given an approval that excludes World Record flights but includes all IGC/FAI Badges and Distance Diplomas." So the CAI20 isn't quite as good as an EW Microrecoder, LX Nano or a CAI 302 (each is approved for "All Flights") but you aren't trying for a world record so what gives with OLC? Stupid question - Are you sure you are submitting the correct IGC file and not a GNII log file? All I have ever done in the past is manually download the CAI IGC file to my PC (actually done via GNII) and then manually upload to OLC (direct claim). See http://www.onlinecontest.org/olc-2.0...eldung_eng.pdf for details. Good luck. - John |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NK Now Offering Support for Legacy Cambridge Products | Paul Remde | Soaring | 1 | July 16th 08 10:12 PM |
Bushite soldiers beat to death innocent Children to 'let offsteam' - Support Our Demands For Open Communications - Unraveling the Mystery- you can not find a single soldier on Earth to publicly support GeorgeW Bush without immediately being re | Tiger | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 10th 08 01:20 AM |
OLC-Posting flights ending after 2400UT | Go | Soaring | 1 | April 2nd 06 12:32 PM |
Yokota airmen deployment ending | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 2nd 04 09:45 PM |
Cambridge 302/Cambridge 3UTIQ255 utility/ WinPilot/iPAQ 4155 | Nathan Whelchel | Soaring | 4 | July 5th 04 11:22 PM |