![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The title just about says it - I've always wondered WHY many
non-precision approaches (not talking about LOC only here, but VOR, VOR/DME, NDB etc) are not lined up with the runway heading. Sometimes it looks as though the approach desginers have gone out of their way to make sure the non-precision approach is just a few degrees off - as if to say - "look stupid - this is not a precision approach . . ." But if this were so, then we would have to wonder why SOME of these approaches ARE lined up and straight-in. I'm surev there's a simple explanation that will be pointed out here. thanks, G Faris |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPS/WAAS VNAV approaches and runway length | Nathan Young | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | October 25th 04 06:16 PM |
Closest SDF, LDA and LOC-BC Approaches | Andrew Sarangan | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | June 5th 04 03:06 PM |
The new Instrument Rating PTS | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | May 27th 04 12:35 AM |
FS2004 approaches, ATC etc | henri Arsenault | Simulators | 14 | September 27th 03 12:48 PM |
Garmin Behind the Curve on WAAS GPS VNAV Approaches | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 18th 03 01:43 PM |