If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Setting altimeters with no radio
Well, what exactly are their reference datum(s?).
mike "Stefan" wrote in message ... mike regish schrieb: My point is that they both are, basically, the same frame of reference-height above sea level. Which is wrong. Stefan |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Setting altimeters with no radio
"Jim Macklin" writes:
they give altitude, accurate to within a few feet. Unfortunately, no, they do not. GPS is accurate for lateral navigation, not vertical navigation. GPS altitudes can easily be off by as much as 200 feet at ground level in comparison to a correctly set altimeter, and at altitude the disparity can reach 500 feet. The reason for this is that the angles used for triangulation of lateral positions are large and permit a high level of precision, but the angles for triangulation of altitude are very small and it's very easy to be off by a wide margin. GPS was designed to measure lateral positions accurately, but it performs poorly for altitude. It is typically much less accurate than an altimeter for altitude, and the computed altitude constantly changes (significantly) as the satellites move, in a way that is, for aviation purposes, practically random. ... just set the altimeter to read the same. This is a good way to fly into a mountain, or another aircraft, or the runway. ... then you know adjusted pressure. considering the legal requirements, it is perfectly adequate. No, it is not. It's especially dangerous for RVSM flight, but it's so inaccurate that it should never be used for anything, except as a last resort (if the altimeters disintegrate, or whatever). -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Setting altimeters with no radio
mike regish writes:
Well, kind of. Most, if not all altimeters now, compensate for pressure variations to show geometric (if that's the right term for it) altitude. Not true. Altimeters show substantial differences with geometric altitude as altitude increases. Air traffic control is based on pressure altitudes, not geometric altitudes. With SA disables in the GPS system, altitude is much more accurate than it was. How accurate, I don't know. GPS altitude can be from 200 to 500 feet off easily. When I compare my altimeter with my GPS's, they're usually about 100' apart. I'm not sure which is more accurate. The altimeter is much more accurate. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Setting altimeters with no radio
"Jim Macklin" writes:
If I take-off in a airplane with no radio and fly through a cold front in VFR, the altimeter setting is likely to change enough to have a 500 foot or greater error with a 100 mile flight. A GPS can be used to get closer than that. Unfortunately, no, it cannot. Probably, most NORDO flights are at or below 3,000 AGL under VFR. Terrain clearance is more critical to such a flight based on the altimeter than is the mid-air collision problem since the "rule" only applies above 3,000 AGL. GPS altitudes are especially dangerous to use near the ground, becuase they are so inaccurate. Someday, the rules may change, but within today's rules, using GPS "as the best available" or only source is better than no source at all. True, if you are far from the ground and you cannot see the ground. Don't trust it to keep you clear of terrain at low altitudes. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Setting altimeters with no radio
"Jim Macklin" writes:
The point about GPS, it is accurate in relation to terrain. It is dangerously inaccurate with respect to terrain. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Setting altimeters with no radio
Stefan writes:
The point is not which one is more accurate. The point is that everybody uses the same frame of reference. Both are valid points. GPS is too inaccurate to use for measuring altitude in aviation, _and_ it uses a different frame of reference, which leads to increasingly large disparities between GPS and pressure altitude at higher altitudes. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Setting altimeters with no radio
mike regish writes:
My point is that they both are, basically, the same frame of reference-height above sea level. Nope. GPS is height above the mean surface of the geoid, altimeter is height above mean sea level. They can be hundreds of feet apart. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Setting altimeters with no radio
Neil Gould writes:
I'm not sure why you think that "GPS is far less accurate than an altimiter..." ... Because I studied GPS for a long time and was using it before anyone else knew what it was, and I know how badly it measures altitude. GPS was designed to accurately measure longitude and latitude; at best, it gives only a rough estimate of altitude (ships and troops, the original users of GPS, don't need to know their altitudes). ... as an altimeter only need be accurate to 75' to be legal. GPS is routinely off by hundreds of feet. GPS can do much better than that ... No, it cannot ... not vertically. It's actually much worse. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Setting altimeters with no radio
mike regish writes:
Well, what exactly are their reference datum(s?). GPS uses a theoretical model of the earth's surface--a geoid. It may or may not coincide with sea level. However, that's not the main source of inaccuracy in GPS altitudes. The main source is the difficulty of measuring altitude when the position to be measured involves so many very oblique angles from the reference satellites. It's easier to measure lateral position looking straight down than it is to measure vertical position looking at a shallow angle from 1000 miles away. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Setting altimeters with no radio
Mxsmanic schrieb:
Well, what exactly are their reference datum(s?). GPS uses a theoretical model of the earth's surface--a geoid. It may or may not coincide with sea level. Which is as theoretical a value. Stefan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
I Hate Radios | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 9 | June 6th 05 05:39 PM |
(sorta OT) Free Ham Radio Course | RST Engineering | Piloting | 43 | January 24th 05 08:05 PM |
1944 Aerial War Comes to Life in Radio Play | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | March 25th 04 10:57 PM |
Ham Radio In The Airplane | Cy Galley | Owning | 23 | July 8th 03 03:30 AM |