![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sam Spade" wrote in message ... It was decided that sending an aircraft to a fix within the IF is into a narrow area that is more properly handled with vectors to final. But, where there are multiple stepdown fixes in the intermediate odds are the MVA would be too high to be compatible with descent requirements. OK, those are clear reasons for not going direct to a fix on the intermediate segment other than the first one, the IF. The altitude issue is a big problem with this business of vectoring to the IF on RNAV approaches. If the IF altitude is not at or above MVA/MIA, the approach may not be flyable with vectors to IF. 7110.65 does not give guidance to controllers on that issue, that I can find. Yes, it is there and clearly stated. It sure is. That's what I get for going from memory. Don't know how I missed that the last time I looked at it, or if I just forgot it. Won't forget it again. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
R172K Approach Configuration | facpi | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | January 5th 07 03:58 PM |
RNAV vectors | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 74 | December 26th 06 10:31 PM |
Trust those Instruments.... Trust those Instruments..... | A Lieberman | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | May 2nd 06 03:54 PM |
Approach Question- Published Missed Can't be flown? | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | May 6th 04 04:19 AM |
Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? | S. Ramirez | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | April 2nd 04 11:13 AM |