![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What's the best way to fly a zero G parabola? My kids are hooked on them and
they're actually learning some science from it. I'd like to get a little more duration without getting too fast. I usually do a little climb until the speed bleeds off some and then push over firmly. Should I pull the power over the top as I'm pushing? mike |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "mike regish" said:
What's the best way to fly a zero G parabola? My kids are hooked on them and they're actually learning some science from it. I'd like to get a little more duration without getting too fast. I usually do a little climb until the speed bleeds off some and then push over firmly. Should I pull the power over the top as I'm pushing? Why don't you get up to full speed, pitch up, then push down a bit? That way you can get negative G's on the way up while you're bleeding off the speed. -- Paul Tomblin http://blog.xcski.com/ I mean, if went 'round saying I was a perl hacker, just because some moistened bint lobbed a "Perl for Dummies" at me, they'd put me away! -- Randy the Random |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"mike regish" wrote: What's the best way to fly a zero G parabola? My kids are hooked on them and they're actually learning some science from it. I'd like to get a little more duration without getting too fast. I usually do a little climb until the speed bleeds off some and then push over firmly. Should I pull the power over the top as I'm pushing? mike While your doing the zero G take a glance at the oil pressure gauge...you may find it has dropped very low. FYI |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mike regish wrote:
I usually do a little climb until the speed bleeds off some and then push over firmly. Should I pull the power over the top as I'm pushing? That's what I do. Keeps me from accelerating excessively in the dive. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) -- Message posted via AviationKB.com http://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums...ation/200705/1 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JGalban via AviationKB.com writes:
That's what I do. Keeps me from accelerating excessively in the dive. Your acceleration is fixed in a parabola. It is always exactly -1.0 G, which precisely negates the pull of gravity and gives you the zero gravity objective. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... JGalban via AviationKB.com writes: That's what I do. Keeps me from accelerating excessively in the dive. Your acceleration is fixed in a parabola. It is always exactly -1.0 G, which precisely negates the pull of gravity and gives you the zero gravity objective. Clueless as usual. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maxwell writes:
Clueless as usual. A zero-G parabola is a ballistic trajectory; it always involves acceleration towards the ground (in the direction of gravity) at exactly 1.0 G. That's how it produces the "zero-G" effect. This being so, you cannot change the acceleration of the aircraft along the vertical axis without losing the zero-G effect. Essentially, if you fire a cannonball next to the aircraft, your aircraft needs to follow the same path as the cannonball in order to become "weightless." -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... A zero-G parabola is a ballistic trajectory; it always involves acceleration towards the ground (in the direction of gravity) at exactly 1.0 G. That's how it produces the "zero-G" effect. This being so, you cannot change the acceleration of the aircraft along the vertical axis without losing the zero-G effect. Essentially, if you fire a cannonball next to the aircraft, your aircraft needs to follow the same path as the cannonball in order to become "weightless." Obviously,,, but it still has "zip" to do with reducing power to avoid accelerating excessively in the dive. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Maxwell writes: Clueless as usual. A zero-G parabola is a ballistic trajectory; No, it isn't. bertie |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Uhh..hate to burst your bubble again, but -1 g would have you straining at
your seatbelt with a force of 1 g. If you're not wearing one, you would be exerting 1 g against the roof. mike "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... JGalban via AviationKB.com writes: That's what I do. Keeps me from accelerating excessively in the dive. Your acceleration is fixed in a parabola. It is always exactly -1.0 G, which precisely negates the pull of gravity and gives you the zero gravity objective. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Saturn V Typical Mission Profile 9903826.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 12th 07 01:37 AM |
ASW27 wing profile templates | basils27 | Soaring | 0 | June 29th 05 11:46 AM |
Looking for 3/8 in-24 thread/low profile self locking nuts/ | Larry | Home Built | 3 | February 23rd 05 03:56 PM |
Looking for 3/8 in-24 thread/low profile self locking nuts/ | Larry | Home Built | 3 | February 22nd 05 03:02 PM |
Aviation Profile Prints for sale | Chris Banyai-Riepl | Military Aviation | 0 | July 7th 04 04:48 AM |