![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Sam Spade" wrote in message ... Well, I use Jeppesen charts an the CCR 004 radial is on there. It was ommitted from the NACO chart in error and will be correct on the 12/20 chart cycle. It was the NACO chart that was referenced in the OP. Omitting it seems like a good idea, what purpose does it serve? NDB navigation. What about it? It is self-explanatory. Sorry if you don't understand. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Sam Spade" wrote in message ... Steve is technically correct that the IAP could begin at KANAN NDB, but I doubt NorCal would ever do that. It COULD begin at KANAN? KANAN is an IAF, do you know what an IAF is? The only feasible routing would be V-108 from the west to CCR, then direct KANAN. That would require ADF equipment just as would the feeder route from COLLI. ADF isn't required for this procedure, so for the non-ADF aircraft the only non-radar entry is viar REJOY. There are several feasible routes, as I explained in an earlier message. That is your opinion in the abstract. You are not qualified at NorCal. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Sam Spade" wrote in message ... The legal method of identifying JOANNS is the SGD 074 and the CCR 006. The DME is charted but useless for fix identification because of the angle. Some piloting/interpretive skills are presumed by the FAA designers. JOANS is identified by the intersection of the SGD 074R and the LOC. That is one way but not the only acceptable way. The DME is not acceptable. You should look at the charts that get this stuff right most of the time. Or, with your inside connections, get a copy of the JOANS 8260-2 The source document states: Fac 1 is the localizer, Fac 2 is CCR VOR, Fac 3 is SGD VORTAC, and Fac 4 is the LOM. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sam Spade" wrote in message ... It is self-explanatory. Sorry if you don't understand. If it was self-explanatory I wouldn't have had to ask the question. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sam Spade" wrote in message ... That is your opinion in the abstract. It is not an opinion. You are not qualified at NorCal. Irrelevant, and Travis serves CCR. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sam Spade" wrote in message ... That is one way but not the only acceptable way. It's the only way necessary. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sam Spade wrote:
The DME is charted but useless for fix identification because of the angle. Some piloting/interpretive skills are presumed by the FAA designers.- I don't understand this. If you're on the localizer and have the CCR 8.1, there is only one place you can be. Why is this a useless means of fix identification? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
finding approach chart URLs | Dave Butler | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | May 14th 07 03:19 PM |
Interpreting AC 43.13 | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 0 | July 16th 06 12:51 PM |
peculiar approach chart | Dave Butler | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | May 27th 06 11:42 PM |
Anyone use Air Chart? | Steven Barnes | Owning | 23 | March 25th 04 05:14 PM |
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |