![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Stadt wrote: Wasn't Bob Hoovers ticket pulled on the spot by a couple of FAA types that had no idea how to fly an airplane? Yes, and that's precisely why inspectors aren't allowed to do it anymore. George Patterson This marriage is off to a shaky start. The groom just asked the band to play "Your cheatin' heart", and the bride just requested "Don't come home a'drinkin' with lovin' on your mind". |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cub Driver wrote:
When I was young and stupid, I was a passenger in a car that was stopped by the Massachusetts state police. The trooper started jawing and jawing about our lack of courtesy, etc., whereupon the tough-guy driver said: "Don't gimme any sh*t, just gimme the ticket." So the trooper did. It made a great story to tell when we got home, but it was really really stupid. Conversely, when I was a young driver, I escaped more than a couple of speeding tickets by simply being polite and showing respect to the officer. No matter how one feels, it rarely ever pays to **** off a government employee. -- Peter |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill, you bring up an interesting point.
Years ago, I visited the Portland Me. GADO office, IGI written in hand, so as to get the IGI rating added to my Ground instructor Certificate. While I was there, the two FAA inspectors were discussing a pending violation of one of the local pilots. His crime: He had just taken (and passed) his ME checkride, BUT THE FAA forgot to add "Multiengine Land" to his temporary certificate. The pilot was caught during a ramp check without the appropriate rating for the plane he was flying(a twin). Sure, the pilot was a dimbulb for not noticing the discrepancy (pays $$ for a ME rating , passes, and no mention of it on the new certificate!), but he was being violated for what was ultimately an error by the FAA. "BllFs6" wrote in message ... What about this? You hand an inspector your papers during a ramp check.... He stupidly takes or keeps something he has no legal right to....that you cant replace on the spot... You are stuck in Middle of Nowhere, Crappy State USA....you and the plane NEED to get somewhere NOW.... You continue on your flight path to your destination.... Now youve shown up somewhere else WITHOUT a critical piece of paper.... WHO gets in trouble for not having the correct papers at the second ramp check? I no nutin about piloting....and an inspector would have to be real jerk before I'd be anything but polite, helpful, and respectable.... but I'm not sure I'd physically let go of any critical piece of paperwork I needed either... As they say...."possesion is 9/10ths of the law" take care Blll |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard Kaplan" wrote in message
Only the W&B form signed by a mechanic counts as the legally required W&B -- a GPS database does not suffice. Can you point me to an FAR that says this? Thanks, Bruce Bockius |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]() (No chart okay, out-of-date chart bad ![]() I know this is a prevalent story, but I have never read of any enforcement action on this. Thanks for the added information. all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com Viva Bush! blog www.vivabush.org |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Most, not all planes. Now they all have to be in the same spot. Pilots side on the fuselage just in fron of the tail. That's pretty funny. I wonder how many DEA guys know that the pilot's side in a J-3 is the port side? (What about the PA-22? The pilot sits on the left but enters and leaves on the right?) all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com Viva Bush! blog www.vivabush.org |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... snip The data plate was located inside the aircraft until the early '90s. Then the feds passed two regulations; one required that all aircraft have 12" high N-numbers and the other required an identification plate be added at the tail. These were quickly ammended to allow aircraft with smaller numbers to retain them until the next paint job, allow some other aircraft (mainly antiques) to retain the smaller numbers, and to allow the registration info to be painted on instead of having a plate if the aircraft did not originally come with an exterior plate. George Patterson The 12' numbers are for crossing the ADIZ and/or for aircraft with a cruise speed that is higher than most piston engined aircraft. Here's the FAR (pulled from the Matronics RV List Archives - a very handy source of information): http://www.matronics.com/searching/search.html 45.29 Size of marks. (a) Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this section, each operator of an aircraft shall display marks on the aircraft meeting the size requirements of this section. (b) Height. Except as provided in paragraph (h) of this part, the nationality and registration marks must be of equal height and on - (1) Fixed-wing aircraft, must be at least 12 inches high, except that: (i) An aircraft displaying marks at least 2 inches high before November 1, 1981 and an aircraft manufactured after November 2, 1981, but before January 1, 1983, may display those marks until the aircraft is repainted or the marks are repainted, restored, or changed; (ii) Marks at least 3 inches high may be displayed on a glider; (iii) Marks at least 3 inches high may be displayed on an aircraft for which an experimental certificate has been issued under 21.191(d) or 21.191(g) for operating as an exhibition aircraft or as an amateur-built aircraft when the maximum cruising speed of the aircraft does not exceed 180 knots CAS; and (iv) Marks may be displayed on an exhibition, antique, or other aircraft in accordance with 45.22. (2) Airships, spherical balloons, and nonspherical balloons, must be at least 3 inches high; and (3) Rotorcraft, must be at least 12 inches high, except that rotorcraft displaying before April 18, 1983, marks required by 45.29(b)(3) in effect on April 17, 1983, and rotorcraft manufactured on or after April 18, 1983, but before December 31, 1983, may display those marks until the aircraft is repainted or the marks are repainted, restored, or changed. (c) Width. Characters must be two-thirds as wide as they are high, except the number "1", which must be one-sixth as wide as it is high, and the letters "M" and "W" which may be as wide as they are high. (d) Thickness. Characters must be formed by solid lines one-sixth as thick as the character is high. (e) Spacing. The space between each character may not be less than one-fourth of the character width. (f) If either one of the surfaces authorized for displaying required marks under 45.25 is large enough for display of marks meeting the size requirements of this section and the other is not, full-size marks shall be placed on the larger surface. If neither surface is large enough for full-size marks, marks as large as practicable shall be displayed on the larger of the two surfaces. If any surface authorized to be marked by 45.27 is not large enough for full-size marks, marks as large as practicable shall be placed on the largest of the authorized surfaces. (g) Uniformity. The marks required by this part for fixed-wing aircraft must have the same height, width, thickness, and spacing on both sides of the aircraft. (h) After March 7, 1988, each operator of an aircraft penetrating an ADIZ or DEWIZ shall display on that aircraft temporary or permanent nationality and registration marks at least 12 inches high. Section iii is for you. Unless you intend to fly a ADIZ or DEWIZ then if your cruising speed is 180 KNOTS CAS you can use the 3". Note! Canada doesn't count. KB |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Again, you DO clearly need current IFR charts --
Although I can't imagine setting off on an IFR flight without a current IFR chart, it is not requried to have ANY chart on an IFR flight! If you get to your destination without a problem fine. If you cause a problem, though, you'll have some explaining to do. vince norris |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
vincent p. norris wrote in
: Again, you DO clearly need current IFR charts -- Although I can't imagine setting off on an IFR flight without a current IFR chart, it is not requried to have ANY chart on an IFR flight! If you get to your destination without a problem fine. If you cause a problem, though, you'll have some explaining to do. vince norris Except taht if you cause a problem, whether the chart is current or not is not going to make any difference. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If you cause a problem, though, you'll have some explaining to do. That reminds me of what my flight instructor said on the subject of whether the FAA actually requires a certificated pilot or mechanic at the controls when you are propping a plane: "Dan, there are a whole lot of reasons why you would not want this to become an issue." all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com Viva Bush! blog www.vivabush.org |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I'M GOING TO DIE TODAY. | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 0 | February 4th 04 09:44 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |
"Target for Today" & "Thunderbolt" WWII Double Feature at Zeno'sDrive-In | Zeno | Aerobatics | 0 | August 2nd 03 07:31 PM |
"Target for Today" & "Thunderbolt": An Awesome WWII DoubleFeature at Zeno's Drive-In | zeno | Military Aviation | 0 | July 14th 03 07:31 PM |
The Yankee Lady Flew Today | Tom Huxton | Piloting | 0 | July 11th 03 11:57 PM |