![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been partially following this thread over the last few days, but I
must say that I wish the 140 would allow a pure wing leveler or HDG mode capability without the VS control. I must admit that I (now know that I) hadn't completely RTFM'd before using it in a 172SP, and got caught by surprise that I was getting VS control as well as HDG control. I know I should've briefed the manual more, but in my defense the single-axis Bendix/King APs that I'd seen before do (by the very fact that they're single-axis) behave differently. My "logic" thought that the dual-axis 140 would behave the same when I pressed the same button. Doh! But that's OK, I'm now flying an SR20 with the Meggitt 55X which behaves the way I think it should 8^) . Dave Blevins On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 05:19:02 GMT, Craig Prouse wrote: "News" wrote: I have another KAP 140 question for the group. Is there a way to have a dual axis w/ pre-select model of the KAP140 act as though it is only a single axis? No, with the KAP 140, either you are flying the airplane or the autopilot is flying the airplane. When the autopilot is flying, you should not attempt to control the airplane with the yoke in either axis. It controls the horizontal. It controls the vertical. Do not adjust your set. Whether you trust the autopilot to fly an approach, or whether you should, is a matter for philosophical debate. I've always hand-flown all of my approaches in actual. I've practiced with it under simulated conditions where I've been impressed that the autopilot can do a fine job for me, unless I misconfigure it -- in which case the resulting deviation can be extremely disorienting. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]() So what do you do in an emergency if you need an approach from the box? That's what paper is for. You do carry current approach plates and enroute charts, don't you? So I pull out the chart for the GPS approach, and manually dial in all the five letter fixes I'd be using? (Whoever designed this twist and look to cycle through the alphabet should be given his own room in Hell). In an emergency I'd rather take the entire approach out of the box, even if it's old (dialing it in by hand won't guarantee fresh data if the database is old) Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | May 1st 04 07:29 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 03:04 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 2 | February 2nd 04 11:41 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |