A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"Refusing to Handle You"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 19th 05, 12:02 AM
Richard Kaplan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message

You advocated a response of "Unable", that suggests you're unwilling to
negotiate.


No, it only means that a specific suggestion is unacceptable.

--------------------
Richard Kaplan

www.flyimc.com


  #2  
Old July 18th 05, 11:26 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dave S" wrote in message
.net...

Your options are to 1) accept the new instructions 2) cancel IFR 3)
declare an emergency in which case you can disregard just about everything
but the laws of physics.


Well, not quite everything, and declaring an emergency isn't quite enough,
you have to actually have one!


  #3  
Old July 18th 05, 08:58 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Richard Kaplan" wrote in message
news:1121648175.acd3b6ead8dfe42fe8c79e5a6ebcabde@t eranews...

The response to that is just what you gave in your original description:
"Unable Reroute due to weather"

The ball is then in their court.

You would be quite justified given the weather you described.


Does your response mean that you'd like to hold at a fix along your present
route until such time that Potomac approach can allow you to continue on it?
Do you understand that you cannot simply continue as previously cleared?
Why would you refuse any reroute due to weather?



You already had an IFR clearance... period. Yes, you are required to
accept ATC clearance amendments that are reasonable but you are not
required to accept such a clearance if it will in your reasonable judgment
endanger the safety of your flight.


The controller didn't issue a clearance amendment, he informed him that
Potomac approach wouldn't accept him and asked him for his intentions. This
is his opportunity to come up with an alternative acceptable to him.


  #4  
Old July 18th 05, 11:08 PM
Richard Kaplan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message

The controller didn't issue a clearance amendment, he informed him that
Potomac approach wouldn't accept him and asked him for his intentions.
This is his opportunity to come up with an alternative acceptable to him.


I guess what I am most saying here is that "Potomac will not accept you"
just does not make sense and therefore I would have little basis upon which
to propose some alternative plan.

--------------------
Richard Kaplan

www.flyimc.com



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flap handle activated Climb/Cruise switching Andy Smielkiewicz Soaring 5 March 14th 05 04:54 AM
You Want Control? You Can't Handle Control! -- Was 140 dead ArtKramr Military Aviation 0 March 2nd 04 08:48 PM
G103 Acro airbrake handle Andy Durbin Soaring 12 January 18th 04 11:51 PM
How do you handle your EFB in the cockpit? greg Instrument Flight Rules 5 November 17th 03 03:47 AM
Need door handle for 1959 Cessna 175 Paul Millner Owning 0 July 4th 03 07:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.