![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don Tuite wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 21:05:41 -0400, Bob Noel wrote: In article JpIYe.396861$xm3.349765@attbi_s21, "Jay Honeck" wrote: Why? I always type two spaces at the end of each sentence. It makes everything more readable. Bingo - the two spaces, even with proportional font, definitely makes the sentence structure more readable. Maybe I'm just old. (-( Here's a link from the University of Chicago manual of style, which favors one space: http://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/C...paceorTwo.html Not surprising. There are a lot of things about Chicago that just aren't right. They also tear up great airports in the middle of the night like the true cowards they are. Matt |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Barrow wrote:
"Capt.Doug" wrote in message ... Even with a collapsed nosegear, rudder effectiveness along with differential braking should keep it on the runway for the first half if not for the entire runway length. Is the rudder strong enough to overcome the friction from the nosegear? That seems improbable to me (just a guess). Probably at high speed such as at initial touchdown. As the plane slowed, probably not, but differential braking probably could. Matt |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Whiting wrote:
Almost all of the engineers and scientists that I've hired during the last 10 years use just one space between sentences. That's probably because the whole world (the latin script writing part of it, anyway) is using only one space ... except exactly one country, of course. Stefan |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"zoltan" said:
Holding the nosegear high during the rollout probably overstressed the tailfin and it will come off during the next flight. What??? How do you figure that? (Can't wait to read THIS explanation) How would the pilot's pitch input affect the rudder? You're thinking of the infamous Airbus tail-shedding accident I assume? |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Happy Dog wrote:
Brakes are used during a soft field landing where the point is to put as little weight as possible on the nose gear. Try again. You have that completely backwards my friend. In a soft field landing you don't touch the brakes because you risk getting the nosegear stuck in the "soft field". Weight transfers forward when braking and the last thing you want is more weight on the nosewheel. No different than braking in a car - the front end dips. Same holds true with the reversers. The engines' thrust line is below the CG. By reversing thrust the nose of the jet is forced down. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:25:45 GMT, Matt Whiting
wrote: Don Tuite wrote: . . . Here's a link from the University of Chicago manual of style, which favors one space: http://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/C...paceorTwo.html Not surprising. There are a lot of things about Chicago that just aren't right. They also tear up great airports in the middle of the night like the true cowards they are. No football team, either. Don |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in
Happy Dog wrote: Brakes are used during a soft field landing where the point is to put as little weight as possible on the nose gear. Try again. You have that completely backwards my friend. In a soft field landing you don't touch the brakes No brakes, huh? What kind of plane are you talking about? Have you done any on short fields? (As most turf strips are.) If it's swampy enough to create enough drag to quickly slow you down well, that's the same as braking, right? *Think.* moo |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Happy Dog wrote:
Brakes are used during a soft field landing where the point is to put as little weight as possible on the nose gear. Not the way I was taught. You stay off the brakes to keep the nose light. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"George Patterson"
Brakes are used during a soft field landing where the point is to put as little weight as possible on the nose gear. Not the way I was taught. You stay off the brakes to keep the nose light. Keeping it light is good. Keeping it in the air (as it will be after TD with full up elevator) is pointless and increases the landing roll. Use the brakes after TD until the speed gets to the point where elevator authority is insufficient to hold the nose up or keep it light enough for the conditions. How much you use then depends on the length of the strip. moo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Yet another alternator problem | Chris Kennedy | Owning | 7 | July 16th 04 04:28 PM |
Nose gear failure | Greg Esres | Owning | 12 | April 20th 04 11:03 PM |
Garmin fixes moving waypoint problem -- almost | Jon Woellhaf | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | November 28th 03 05:29 PM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart D. Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 22nd 03 06:24 AM |
Landing gear door operation | Elliot Wilen | Naval Aviation | 11 | July 7th 03 03:47 PM |