If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Here is another possibility. Maybe the FAA filled so many key management
positions in safety areas with incompetent minorities and women that privatization is the only way to clean it up? 8 years of Clinton filled the Government at all directions with women, minorities and homosexuals many of whom are incompetent or unqualified. Now they are entrenched pushing social agendas rather than air safety. Maybe that is the real reason for private takeover??? I understand the real reason for the NASA problems is retirement of "white male" experts only to be taken over by unqualified minorities. It is not politically correct to exam the possibility but it's looking like NASA, the FAA and other high technology Government organizations are suffering because of social agendas and politically correct hiring practices. Private companies with money and profit in mind are not so bound by PC and social engineering. Kevin Wetzel - ISP Toolz wrote: "David H" wrote in message ... Will Alaska (and other states with votes that the administration thinks they can woo) also get an exemption from the recent legislation that specifies that seafood inspectors are "inherantly governmental" and thus can't be privatized? The Bush administration sure does seem to have a major bug up its ass about forcing ATC privatization - WHY? At the same time they're declaring things like seafood inspectors are inherantly governmental (not to mention those federal employees who screen baggage for nail clippers). There's something here that doesn't quite add up. They seem really, really intent on pushing ATC privatization. What's really behind this? Who stands to gain from ATC privatization? Are there major businesses that do this now, and others that are quietly preparing to pick up some fat federal ATC contracts? Do these companies have any connection to the white house and friends? "Follow the money...." COMMENTS: I completely agree that there is an alternative driving force behind this. Once of the funny things that I see is that if the white house were to privatize the ATC functions it would have just another person to blame outside the government for its failure to fix security related issues, the increase in traffic as seen at airports (delays, longer holding patterns, etc). If they really wanted to fix this issue they should probably start by giving airports more grants and funding to accomplish advances in ATC instead of trying to privatize it and then point the finger later at the contractors failures. The federal government has pretty much failed in regard to making these systems better for pilots. Instead of changing the people they should change the bogus TFR's that pop up out of nowhere and serve no real purpose. Im tired for one of a government that restricts the population for its own personal uses and gains (or the gains of those elected). If each one of the elected officials in Washington were affected by TFR's, privatization of ATC and other issues you can bet that the rules of engagement would have changed and for one the ADIZ in Washington DC (which serves no purpose to prevent terrorism at all) would have been removed by now. As I see it at 400MPH they could'nt stop a jetliner in time anyway with the size of the ADIZ. Anyway im not gonna ramble on. I think the entire system needs to be looked at and changed. Kevin Wetzel ISP Toolz http://www.isptoolz.com/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
JJ wrote in message ...
Here is another possibility. Maybe the FAA filled so many key management positions in safety areas with incompetent minorities and women that privatization is the only way to clean it up? 8 years of Clinton filled the Government at all directions with women, minorities and homosexuals many of whom are incompetent or unqualified. Now they are entrenched pushing social agendas rather than air safety. Maybe that is the real reason for private takeover??? Nice try, Troll. Back to alt.atlanta or ny.politics now. Sydney |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Snowbird" wrote in message om... JJ wrote in message ... Here is another possibility. Maybe the FAA filled so many key management positions in safety areas with incompetent minorities and women that privatization is the only way to clean it up? 8 years of Clinton filled the Government at all directions with women, minorities and homosexuals many of whom are incompetent or unqualified. Now they are entrenched pushing social agendas rather than air safety. Maybe that is the real reason for private takeover??? Nice try, Troll. Back to alt.atlanta or ny.politics now. Sydney You know, it would go a lot further if you would just refute him rather than engage in name-calling because you feel uncomfortable with something non-PC he said. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|