A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

TACAN



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 3rd 06, 09:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TACAN

Bob Moore wrote:
"M. J. Powell" wrote


Except ICs instead of valves?



It wasn't the size of the electronics, but rather the
large antenna array required of the VOR system. A VOR
antenna must be permanently aligned to the earth,
something not possible with such a large array onboard
a ship. The TACAN system operating on a different
principle than VOR solved the size and alignment problems.


Bob Moore

Can you either explain how a TACAN works or provide a reference? Thanks.
  #2  
Old January 3rd 06, 11:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TACAN

In message , Bob Moore
writes
"M. J. Powell" wrote

Except ICs instead of valves?


It wasn't the size of the electronics, but rather the
large antenna array required of the VOR system. A VOR
antenna must be permanently aligned to the earth,
something not possible with such a large array onboard
a ship. The TACAN system operating on a different
principle than VOR solved the size and alignment problems.


Right. Thank you, again.

Mike
--
M.J.Powell
  #3  
Old January 4th 06, 01:31 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TACAN

Bob Moore wrote:

"M. J. Powell" wrote

Except ICs instead of valves?


It wasn't the size of the electronics, but rather the
large antenna array required of the VOR system. A VOR
antenna must be permanently aligned to the earth,
something not possible with such a large array onboard
a ship. The TACAN system operating on a different
principle than VOR solved the size and alignment problems.


The writeup at
http://www.radarpages.co.uk/mob/nava...can/tacan1.htm
has already been mentioned.

Aside from size and earth orientation, TACAN has two advantages
over VOR for shipboard use.

1. TACAN uses a bearing reference direction of due east. For a
shipboard installation, that means a properly corrected compass
reference and a means of correcting the antenna orientation.

2. TACAN incorporates a ranging transponder (DME) in the
transmitter site. The aircraft interrogates the system, and the
site's transponder responds after a fixed 50 microsecond delay.
The site's azimuth and range are typically displayed on a
combined bearing/distance/heading indicator. The combination of
bearing and range display clears up any of the to/from confusion
possible with VOR sites.

| George Ruch
| "Is there life in Clovis after Clovis Man?"
  #4  
Old January 4th 06, 05:40 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TACAN

Bob Moore wrote:
A VOR
antenna must be permanently aligned to the earth,


Why? Why not have a heading indicator (or DG) to drive the 'angles' (i.e.
phase) it sends out?

Hilton


  #5  
Old January 7th 06, 02:57 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TACAN

M. J. Powell wrote:
Is TACAN still in use? I worked on it briefly in 1956 when I was in the
RAF.


I remember from a recent history or discovery channel program that
air-to-air tacan is still used for aerial refueling operations.

Here's a page about it from Rockwell:
http://www.rockwellcollins.com/ecat/gs/TCN-550_Tacan.html

- Ray
  #6  
Old January 7th 06, 03:48 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TACAN

Ray wrote:

M. J. Powell wrote:
Is TACAN still in use? I worked on it briefly in 1956 when I was in the
RAF.


I remember from a recent history or discovery channel program that
air-to-air tacan is still used for aerial refueling operations.

Here's a page about it from Rockwell:
http://www.rockwellcollins.com/ecat/gs/TCN-550_Tacan.html


When I was stationed in Thailand, I also heard about A-A mode
being used in a two-ship formation when a major system (attack
radar or INS) failed. The aircraft with working systems would
lead, and the aircraft with the failed system would follow the
leader. As I understand it, buddy bombing was possible, but may
not have been all that accurate.

| George Ruch
| "Is there life in Clovis after Clovis Man?"
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wherewhendid dual speed on ias come from Gene Whitt Instrument Flight Rules 7 October 27th 05 12:31 AM
Idents on VOR+DME if one of them is inop Robert M. Gary Instrument Flight Rules 14 January 24th 05 10:10 AM
KRMN ILS 33- Interesting Approach Brad Z Instrument Flight Rules 11 May 21st 04 10:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.