If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Not to be pessimistic, where in my FAA ATC bible does it say "official
source"?. Available to ATC may be just a phone call away. I passed a CBI based ASOS test at an FCT and was qualified to disseminate weather if the ASOS failed. The only qualifications I needed after the test was to send in an observation every quarter to the NWS. So what makes me any more qualified than a guy who actually went to school for the weather certification. I only ask this question because it was asked of me by a long time ATC instructor. Would a PIREP be good enough? oneatcer "Newps" wrote in message ... It must be an official source and available to ATC. Your buddy the line boy at the FBO who passed a weather observers test 8 years ago does not qualify. wrote: If I'm not mistaken, the reported weather has to be available to ATC in some fashion, but I'm not absolutely positive. One of our resident ATC guys will know, for sure. On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:36:34 -0500, Roy Smith wrote: wrote: ASOS, AWOS, or a qualified weather observer, if I'm not mistaken. I guess the next question is, "reported to whom?". Let's say for example my FBO has a certified weather observer on staff. I call up on unicom, ask for the weather, and am told it's 5000 broken and 2 miles. Does that count as "reported"? When I ask ATC for a contact approach, they won't have that observation. Do I just tell the controller that I've got a report from the FBO? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Do I just tell the controller that I've got a report from the FBO?
Sure, why not? As a controller I have to disseminate PIREPs (which are considered valid), why shouldn't I believe you that a pilot at an FBO reported the weather as you said? The other requirement for clearing an aircraft for a contact approach is that the airport has a published instrument approach. If the airport I am working at is reporting 100/ 1/2 and your airport of intended landing has mins of 4000/3, do I clear you/or not for the published approach when you give me a PIREP of CAVU? I'm not trying to be antagonistic, but I'd like the true answer too. oneatcer "Roy Smith" wrote in message ... wrote: ASOS, AWOS, or a qualified weather observer, if I'm not mistaken. I guess the next question is, "reported to whom?". Let's say for example my FBO has a certified weather observer on staff. I call up on unicom, ask for the weather, and am told it's 5000 broken and 2 miles. Does that count as "reported"? When I ask ATC for a contact approach, they won't have that observation. Do I just tell the controller that I've got a report from the FBO? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
My book say PIREPs are acceptable for the fact that I have to disseminate
them. Controllers can make a ground vis report. AWOS/ASOS is ground vis. METARs 45 minutes old will suffice due to the requirements of issuing a new METAR when the vis changes by a reportable value. And if my memory serves me right, that is +/- 1/4 mile when it gets down around 1 mile. Also, I say it doesn't have to be an "absolutely certified weather observer", if that was the case there would be no such thing as a contact approach. That's my take on it, any ideas from you pilots? oneatcer "Stan Prevost" wrote in message ... "raphaël langumier" wrote in message ... Yes, Ground visibility should be at least 1 SM and the pilot have to request the contact approach. Raf The AIM says that, to request the contact approach, the pilot must have one mile *flight* visibility. For ATC to approve the request, the *reported* *ground* visibility must be one mile. The question is really how literally that "reported ground visibility" rule is used. Is a PIREP acceptable? Are conditions observed five miles away by a certified human weather observer acceptable? Can any tower controller at the field make an acceptable report? Is the AWOS/ASOS observation "ground visibility"? Will a METAR report 45 minutes old suffice? Or must it absolutely be a certified weather observer on the field reporting current conditions to whoever calls on the landline? Or what? Stan |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"oneatcer" wrote in message ... Reported by whom or what? Ground visibility is prevailing horizontal visibility near the earth's surface as reported by the United States National Weather Service or an accredited observer. The accredited observer can be a Federally commissioned weather observing system. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Roy Smith" wrote in message ... I guess the next question is, "reported to whom?". To ATC. Let's say for example my FBO has a certified weather observer on staff. I call up on unicom, ask for the weather, and am told it's 5000 broken and 2 miles. Does that count as "reported"? When I ask ATC for a contact approach, they won't have that observation. Do I just tell the controller that I've got a report from the FBO? If your FBO has a certified weather observer on staff ATC will have that observation. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"oneatcer" wrote in message ... Not to be pessimistic, where in my FAA ATC bible does it say "official source"? FAAO 7110.65, para 7-4-6.b. says, "The reported ground visibility is at least 1 statute mile." The Pilot/Controller Glossary and FAR Part 1 both define Ground Visibility as "Prevailing horizontal visibility near the earth's surface as reported by the United States National Weather Service or an accredited observer." Available to ATC may be just a phone call away. I passed a CBI based ASOS test at an FCT and was qualified to disseminate weather if the ASOS failed. The only qualifications I needed after the test was to send in an observation every quarter to the NWS. So what makes me any more qualified than a guy who actually went to school for the weather certification. Nothing. I only ask this question because it was asked of me by a long time ATC instructor. Would a PIREP be good enough? No. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Stan Prevost" wrote in message ... The question is really how literally that "reported ground visibility" rule is used. Is a PIREP acceptable? No. Ground visibility is determined by sighting objects a known distance away. A PIREP is just a guess, and many pilots are very bad at guessing distance. Are conditions observed five miles away by a certified human weather observer acceptable? No. Can any tower controller at the field make an acceptable report? If the controller is the accredited weather observer, then yes. Being certified to make tower visibility observations is not sufficient. Is the AWOS/ASOS observation "ground visibility"? Yes. Will a METAR report 45 minutes old suffice? Yes, if it hasn't been superceded by a SPECI. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"oneatcer" wrote in message ... Also, I say it doesn't have to be an "absolutely certified weather observer", if that was the case there would be no such thing as a contact approach. That's my take on it, any ideas from you pilots? Well, you're wrong. It does have to be an "absolutely certified weather observer". |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Roy Smith wrote in
: Let's say for example my FBO has a certified weather observer on staff. I call up on unicom, ask for the weather, and am told it's 5000 broken and 2 miles. Does that count as "reported"? When I ask ATC for a contact approach, they won't have that observation. Do I just tell the controller that I've got a report from the FBO? You just tell him that you have the weather. I do this all the time, flying approaches to slimeholes in the backwaters of south Louisiana, using weather from company observers, under Part 135. They're certified, and do make supplemental observations to the NWS, but mostly they just do observations for us when needed. It's the same as any other weather report, and the same as if you get it from a tower. The ATC specialist doesn't care where the weather came from, or how you got it. All he cares about is that you can get on the ground and out of his airspace. Tell him you have the Podunk weather, want to fly the approach, and he'll give you a clearance. -- Regards, Stan "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." B. Franklin |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 04:09:05 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote: If your FBO has a certified weather observer on staff ATC will have that observation. Steve, What's your take on this situation? There was an accredited weather observer on the ground at KEPM. KEPM rarely in the past would report weather to Bangor Radio, but did not on this particular day. I contacted this observer on 122.8 and obtained the visibility from him. I then relayed this information to ATC and told them it was from an accredited observer. I was then cleared for a contact approach. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPS approach question | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 08 03:54 AM |
Contact approach question | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 114 | January 31st 05 06:40 PM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? | S. Ramirez | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | April 2nd 04 11:13 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |