If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
Best option for electric self starting glider
2G wrote on 4/15/2020 11:48 PM:
On Wednesday, April 15, 2020 at 4:10:28 PM UTC-7, Eric Greenwell wrote: Dan Marotta wrote on 4/15/2020 2:30 PM: You're right, Tom. I recall the time we got low over an airport about 60 nm from home. Rather than land, I started the engine and discovered that we were low on fuel.* Rather than give up, I climbed straight ahead under power, watching the glide back to the airport, until I had a certain glide home.* I had enough fuel, though not enough to make me comfortable.* I now won't take off with less than about 3/8 of a tank, or about 12 gallons. On 4/14/2020 7:38 PM, 2G wrote: When you are flying a motorglider the FAA considers it to be a glider and fuel reserves don't apply. The point is that planning launches or retrieves w/o factoring in reserves is a bad idea. You will NEVER get the promised performance for a variety of reasons. It would be like planning a final glide using the max L/D. Tom Contest pilots often start their final glide even lower than a max L/D glide, when they know the conditions on the way to the airport have some rising air. Uvalde is well-known for that kind of planning. I don't think it is always necessary to factor in reserves, either, as long as you have a safe place to land if it doesn't work out. That seems to be what Dan did: not enough fuel to provide an adequate reserve, but a bail-out plan if he didn't get lucky. I do agree with your point in general, however, which applies to all glider flying, powered or not. I don't worry about what "contest" pilots do - they are trying to win a contest. I would NEVER plan a glide at best L/D where the consequences are a crash - and neither should you or anybody else. Those contest pilots at Uvalde do exactly what you recommend. My point is your "reserves" do not have to be fuel in the tank or watt hours in the battery - those are conveniences. What matters is keeping a safe place to land within "easy" reach. That's what I do, and that's what I've recommended for decades. It's even documented in my "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" :^) -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
Best option for electric self starting glider
On Thursday, April 16, 2020 at 5:51:04 AM UTC-7, Eric Greenwell wrote:
2G wrote on 4/15/2020 11:48 PM: On Wednesday, April 15, 2020 at 4:10:28 PM UTC-7, Eric Greenwell wrote: Dan Marotta wrote on 4/15/2020 2:30 PM: You're right, Tom. I recall the time we got low over an airport about 60 nm from home. Rather than land, I started the engine and discovered that we were low on fuel.Â* Rather than give up, I climbed straight ahead under power, watching the glide back to the airport, until I had a certain glide home.Â* I had enough fuel, though not enough to make me comfortable.Â* I now won't take off with less than about 3/8 of a tank, or about 12 gallons. On 4/14/2020 7:38 PM, 2G wrote: When you are flying a motorglider the FAA considers it to be a glider and fuel reserves don't apply. The point is that planning launches or retrieves w/o factoring in reserves is a bad idea. You will NEVER get the promised performance for a variety of reasons. It would be like planning a final glide using the max L/D. Tom Contest pilots often start their final glide even lower than a max L/D glide, when they know the conditions on the way to the airport have some rising air. Uvalde is well-known for that kind of planning. I don't think it is always necessary to factor in reserves, either, as long as you have a safe place to land if it doesn't work out. That seems to be what Dan did: not enough fuel to provide an adequate reserve, but a bail-out plan if he didn't get lucky. I do agree with your point in general, however, which applies to all glider flying, powered or not. I don't worry about what "contest" pilots do - they are trying to win a contest. I would NEVER plan a glide at best L/D where the consequences are a crash - and neither should you or anybody else. Those contest pilots at Uvalde do exactly what you recommend. My point is your "reserves" do not have to be fuel in the tank or watt hours in the battery - those are conveniences. What matters is keeping a safe place to land within "easy" reach. That's what I do, and that's what I've recommended for decades. It's even documented in my "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" :^) -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 Even if you have a safe place to land, most of us use, or our glide computers use via a high McCready setting, a conservative glide angle. This works and we know it works (most of the time). This is a basic element of flying gliders safely. Peter Masak died when he violated this basic principal and went down in unlandable territory. It seems like you are taking the opposite side of this very basic principal to somehow justify eking out the last drop of electrical performance from electric self-launchers. I am cautioning against this because it is, basically, bad policy that will, ultimately, end badly. Tom |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
Best option for electric self starting glider
Old aviation quote:
"The only time you have too much fuel is when you are on fire." |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
Best option for electric self starting glider
2G wrote on 4/16/2020 7:18 PM:
On Thursday, April 16, 2020 at 5:51:04 AM UTC-7, Eric Greenwell wrote: 2G wrote on 4/15/2020 11:48 PM: On Wednesday, April 15, 2020 at 4:10:28 PM UTC-7, Eric Greenwell wrote: Dan Marotta wrote on 4/15/2020 2:30 PM: You're right, Tom. I recall the time we got low over an airport about 60 nm from home. Rather than land, I started the engine and discovered that we were low on fuel.* Rather than give up, I climbed straight ahead under power, watching the glide back to the airport, until I had a certain glide home.* I had enough fuel, though not enough to make me comfortable.* I now won't take off with less than about 3/8 of a tank, or about 12 gallons. On 4/14/2020 7:38 PM, 2G wrote: When you are flying a motorglider the FAA considers it to be a glider and fuel reserves don't apply. The point is that planning launches or retrieves w/o factoring in reserves is a bad idea. You will NEVER get the promised performance for a variety of reasons. It would be like planning a final glide using the max L/D. Tom Contest pilots often start their final glide even lower than a max L/D glide, when they know the conditions on the way to the airport have some rising air. Uvalde is well-known for that kind of planning. I don't think it is always necessary to factor in reserves, either, as long as you have a safe place to land if it doesn't work out. That seems to be what Dan did: not enough fuel to provide an adequate reserve, but a bail-out plan if he didn't get lucky. I do agree with your point in general, however, which applies to all glider flying, powered or not. I don't worry about what "contest" pilots do - they are trying to win a contest. I would NEVER plan a glide at best L/D where the consequences are a crash - and neither should you or anybody else. Those contest pilots at Uvalde do exactly what you recommend. My point is your "reserves" do not have to be fuel in the tank or watt hours in the battery - those are conveniences. What matters is keeping a safe place to land within "easy" reach. That's what I do, and that's what I've recommended for decades. It's even documented in my "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" :^) Even if you have a safe place to land, most of us use, or our glide computers use via a high McCready setting, a conservative glide angle. This works and we know it works (most of the time). This is a basic element of flying gliders safely. Peter Masak died when he violated this basic principal and went down in unlandable territory. It seems like you are taking the opposite side of this very basic principal to somehow justify eking out the last drop of electrical performance from electric self-launchers. I am cautioning against this because it is, basically, bad policy that will, ultimately, end badly. Look at my paragraph above yours, where I say "...as long as you have a safe place to land if it doesn't if it work out". Aren't we advocating the same thing? This discussion about the performance of electric gliders was based mostly on the manufacturers numbers. NOBODY suggested these numbers can be trusted to be so accurate you can discard the normal glider pilot cautions about the uncertainties in what we do. Still, they are accurate enough to make useful comparisons for the purposes of the discussion. Case in point: You said none of the electric gliders could run for more than 30 minutes, and I responded with examples of electric gliders that clearly can exceed that. That's just factual disagreement, not a recommendation you fly the glider until the motor stops. Please Read my "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" (link below) for a better understanding of what I think are good practices for being safe in a motorglider. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
Best option for electric self starting glider
On Thursday, April 16, 2020 at 8:20:37 PM UTC-7, Eric Greenwell wrote:
2G wrote on 4/16/2020 7:18 PM: On Thursday, April 16, 2020 at 5:51:04 AM UTC-7, Eric Greenwell wrote: 2G wrote on 4/15/2020 11:48 PM: On Wednesday, April 15, 2020 at 4:10:28 PM UTC-7, Eric Greenwell wrote: Dan Marotta wrote on 4/15/2020 2:30 PM: You're right, Tom. I recall the time we got low over an airport about 60 nm from home. Rather than land, I started the engine and discovered that we were low on fuel.Â* Rather than give up, I climbed straight ahead under power, watching the glide back to the airport, until I had a certain glide home.Â* I had enough fuel, though not enough to make me comfortable.Â* I now won't take off with less than about 3/8 of a tank, or about 12 gallons. On 4/14/2020 7:38 PM, 2G wrote: When you are flying a motorglider the FAA considers it to be a glider and fuel reserves don't apply. The point is that planning launches or retrieves w/o factoring in reserves is a bad idea. You will NEVER get the promised performance for a variety of reasons. It would be like planning a final glide using the max L/D. Tom Contest pilots often start their final glide even lower than a max L/D glide, when they know the conditions on the way to the airport have some rising air. Uvalde is well-known for that kind of planning. I don't think it is always necessary to factor in reserves, either, as long as you have a safe place to land if it doesn't work out. That seems to be what Dan did: not enough fuel to provide an adequate reserve, but a bail-out plan if he didn't get lucky. I do agree with your point in general, however, which applies to all glider flying, powered or not. I don't worry about what "contest" pilots do - they are trying to win a contest. I would NEVER plan a glide at best L/D where the consequences are a crash - and neither should you or anybody else. Those contest pilots at Uvalde do exactly what you recommend. My point is your "reserves" do not have to be fuel in the tank or watt hours in the battery - those are conveniences. What matters is keeping a safe place to land within "easy" reach. That's what I do, and that's what I've recommended for decades. It's even documented in my "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" :^) Even if you have a safe place to land, most of us use, or our glide computers use via a high McCready setting, a conservative glide angle. This works and we know it works (most of the time). This is a basic element of flying gliders safely. Peter Masak died when he violated this basic principal and went down in unlandable territory. It seems like you are taking the opposite side of this very basic principal to somehow justify eking out the last drop of electrical performance from electric self-launchers. I am cautioning against this because it is, basically, bad policy that will, ultimately, end badly. Look at my paragraph above yours, where I say "...as long as you have a safe place to land if it doesn't if it work out". Aren't we advocating the same thing? This discussion about the performance of electric gliders was based mostly on the manufacturers numbers. NOBODY suggested these numbers can be trusted to be so accurate you can discard the normal glider pilot cautions about the uncertainties in what we do. Still, they are accurate enough to make useful comparisons for the purposes of the discussion. Case in point: You said none of the electric gliders could run for more than 30 minutes, and I responded with examples of electric gliders that clearly can exceed that. That's just factual disagreement, not a recommendation you fly the glider until the motor stops. Please Read my "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" (link below) for a better understanding of what I think are good practices for being safe in a motorglider. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 The 30 minutes was at full power, not a low power cruise setting. Tom |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
Best option for electric self starting glider
2G wrote on 4/16/2020 8:34 PM:
On Thursday, April 16, 2020 at 8:20:37 PM UTC-7, Eric Greenwell wrote: This discussion about the performance of electric gliders was based mostly on the manufacturers numbers. NOBODY suggested these numbers can be trusted to be so accurate you can discard the normal glider pilot cautions about the uncertainties in what we do. Still, they are accurate enough to make useful comparisons for the purposes of the discussion. Case in point: You said none of the electric gliders could run for more than 30 minutes, and I responded with examples of electric gliders that clearly can exceed that. That's just factual disagreement, not a recommendation you fly the glider until the motor stops. Please Read my "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" (link below) for a better understanding of what I think are good practices for being safe in a motorglider. The 30 minutes was at full power, not a low power cruise setting. Your original reference was to 30 minute VFR fuel reserves, which are at cruise power, not full power, so I assumed your 30 minute remark about electric gliders duration was also about cruising. Practically speaking, full power duration is not a useful number when talking about motorgliders; instead, it's climb rate for the launch, and range using the motor, that are the important numbers. You and I are accustomed to using the "saw tooth" method for achieving maximum range in our gas powered gliders, but for FES gliders (and I thin also for the GP15), steady cruising is the way to achieve maximum range. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
Best option for electric self starting glider
wrote on 4/16/2020 8:07 PM:
Old aviation quote: "The only time you have too much fuel is when you are on fire." Us Pedantics would argue even with that! -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
Best option for electric self starting glider
On Wednesday, April 15, 2020 at 11:48:48 PM UTC-7, 2G wrote:
On Wednesday, April 15, 2020 at 4:10:28 PM UTC-7, Eric Greenwell wrote: Dan Marotta wrote on 4/15/2020 2:30 PM: You're right, Tom. I recall the time we got low over an airport about 60 nm from home. Rather than land, I started the engine and discovered that we were low on fuel.Â* Rather than give up, I climbed straight ahead under power, watching the glide back to the airport, until I had a certain glide home.Â* I had enough fuel, though not enough to make me comfortable.Â* I now won't take off with less than about 3/8 of a tank, or about 12 gallons. On 4/14/2020 7:38 PM, 2G wrote: When you are flying a motorglider the FAA considers it to be a glider and fuel reserves don't apply. The point is that planning launches or retrieves w/o factoring in reserves is a bad idea. You will NEVER get the promised performance for a variety of reasons. It would be like planning a final glide using the max L/D. Tom Contest pilots often start their final glide even lower than a max L/D glide, when they know the conditions on the way to the airport have some rising air.. Uvalde is well-known for that kind of planning. I don't think it is always necessary to factor in reserves, either, as long as you have a safe place to land if it doesn't work out. That seems to be what Dan did: not enough fuel to provide an adequate reserve, but a bail-out plan if he didn't get lucky. I do agree with your point in general, however, which applies to all glider flying, powered or not. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 I don't worry about what "contest" pilots do - they are trying to win a contest. I would NEVER plan a glide at best L/D where the consequences are a crash - and neither should you or anybody else. Difficult to state maxims about XC flying, but I would think most western flyers start their final glide before the computer says you have the numbers.. If you have been flying though lift the entire day, why wouldn't you take into consideration the amount of lift you are likely to hit on the way home. Now if the air is getting still and the day dying, one should not plan on finding additional lift. There is rarely a right answer in xc soaring, but there can definitely be a wrong answer. |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
Best option for electric self starting glider
most of the time I fly on final the day is dying, so making sure I have it nailed is a requirment 😂😂
|
#130
|
|||
|
|||
Best option for electric self starting glider
Overall, the FES sounds like a very good option to me.
However someone mentioned the real possibility of prop strike. If this happen, I still want to be able to fly my glider as a pure glider until I get the new prop, but if I need to send the motor for repair, or worse, send my ship to Europe to repair the motor, then this could be a deal breaker. Anyone knows more about the consequences (and cost) of prop strike? Ramy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Jump starting solo motor glider with automobile 12 volt starter | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | April 2nd 15 07:25 PM |
America Wills Justice as Freedom for Our Stays The Rightardstates 'No Public Option! No Public Option!' | Daryl | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 14th 12 04:40 AM |
Electric Duct Fan (EDF) Self-Launch Glider? | CLewis95 | Soaring | 26 | January 20th 11 06:27 PM |
Electric Glider | Mal | Soaring | 20 | November 2nd 05 10:46 PM |
Toronto Area Glider Pilot Ground School starting Tuesday September 20 | Ulf | Soaring | 0 | September 11th 05 04:59 PM |