If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Garmin 296
I've used a 295 for aviation purposes since it came out and a Street
Pilot III for auto trips. Recently, issues developed with reestablishing the update chain for the SP III road map software. So, I decided to upgrade to a 296, which does "trains, planes, and automobiles." (Actually, aviation, automotive, and marine). What a awesome unit! So much better than the 295 and soooooo much faster than the SP III when doing automotive routes and recalculations. The "TAWS" mode alone is worth the price of admission. I ran the Henderson/NASCAR King Air CFIT crash in the simulation mode. There was plenty of warning from the 296 along that track and at their presumed altitude. Even if their altitude changed once the TRACON lost radar, they still would have received timely warnings. Also, with the situational awareness affored by the map (this is true of the 295 as well) they probably wouldn't have gone where they went. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I love my 296. I dumped my 295 years ago because Garmin was so far
behind the technology curve for so long. With the 296, they've caught up. I sold my Skymap IIIc for an amount that covered much of the new 296. The one critical problem with the 296 is the lack of airways. It was hard to get rid of my King Skymap IIIc. Out West airways rule because they thread us through the mountains. Having to go back to the old VOR/DME method of flying the airways is disappointing but the 296 has enough features that I'm otherwise happy. The terrain feature of the 296 is better than the SkyMap IIIc. -Robert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
An airway database would sure be nice. But, at least we have a 300 leg
flight-plan capability unlike the IFR 400/500 units. "Robert M. Gary" wrote: I love my 296. I dumped my 295 years ago because Garmin was so far behind the technology curve for so long. With the 296, they've caught up. I sold my Skymap IIIc for an amount that covered much of the new 296. The one critical problem with the 296 is the lack of airways. It was hard to get rid of my King Skymap IIIc. Out West airways rule because they thread us through the mountains. Having to go back to the old VOR/DME method of flying the airways is disappointing but the 296 has enough features that I'm otherwise happy. The terrain feature of the 296 is better than the SkyMap IIIc. -Robert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Why not enter a flight plan on the 296 with the waypoints which describe an
airway? That works great to backup and simplify VOR navigation. -------------------- Richard Kaplan www.flyimc.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Geez - what could be simpler than tracking an airway by VOR navigation? Is
following the little magenta line really easier than "needle left, fly left" ? I love GPS, but really - this is an IFR forum. "Richard Kaplan" wrote in message news:1121277531.0fef1f7f9e9f8c1fe30e3b62c2736376@t eranews... Why not enter a flight plan on the 296 with the waypoints which describe an airway? That works great to backup and simplify VOR navigation. -------------------- Richard Kaplan www.flyimc.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"RjL" wrote in message
Geez - what could be simpler than tracking an airway by VOR navigation? Is following the little magenta line really easier than "needle left, fly left" Portable GPS can back up but not replace a VOR receiver on airways. However, yes, a backup GPS can make things quite a bit easier at times. One example is when you are close to the VOR station and the VOR needle is highly sensitive. Another example is to help establish a crab angle when flying an airway with a signficant crosswind aloft. Yet another example is for situational awareness with respect to weather or alternate landing sites. There are dozens more ways a portable GPS can be quite helpful to an IFR pilot as a backup navigational device. -------------------- Richard Kaplan www.flyimc.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Kaplan wrote:
Another example is to help establish a crab angle when flying an airway with a signficant crosswind aloft. Richard, I need you to explain this statement. VOR doesn't care what heading the airplane is flying, so how does the crab angle affect the track if you are keeping the needles centered? You simply adjust your crab angle right or left to maintain the track, correct? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"RjL" wrote: Geez - what could be simpler than tracking an airway by VOR navigation? Is following the little magenta line really easier than "needle left, fly left" ? It may be simple, but it's not all that accurate compared with GPS, especially if you're a ways out from the VOR. JKG |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
RjL wrote: Geez - what could be simpler than tracking an airway by VOR navigation? Is following the little magenta line really easier than "needle left, fly left" ? Yes, because there's no interpolation. The GPS also gives you your ground track and desired track. You get on the line and match the numbers. All GPS's also tell you how far off the line you are to a precision not needed for even IFR flight. Mine goes to the hundredth of a mile, 53 feet. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS | Rhett | Piloting | 10 | March 23rd 05 01:16 AM |
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) | Jon Woellhaf | Piloting | 12 | September 4th 04 11:55 PM |
Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS | Rhett | Products | 10 | April 29th 04 06:57 AM |
Garmin DME arc weidnress | Dave Touretzky | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | October 2nd 03 02:04 AM |
Garmin 90 Database Updates Discontinued | Val Christian | Piloting | 14 | August 20th 03 09:32 PM |