If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I've recently had a discussion with my A&P/IA about this. He routinely hops
in his turbo arrow, and flies from Virginia to Key West VFR at 11000' without talking to a soul. Right over top of Class-C and Class-B. What he says, (and I tend to agree with him anymore), is if you talk to them, even if you're clear of their airspace, they'll try to route you over hell and gone. Having flown under and over Chicago's airspace, a number of times, you find this more often than not. Rather than encouraging the additional safety of flight following, this really discourages working with the approach controllers. Same thing talking with Milwaukee approach every time I've gone up there. I'm coming lakeshore from the south, planning to go just outside of their Class-C on my way in to Capitol, also just outside their Class-C. If I talk to them, they'll route me 10 miles to the west, every time... even without traffic conflict. Of course, as you said, listening to some VFR pilots bumbling on the radio like they're Smokey and the Bandit, it's no wonder why the controllers would rather not talk to VFR pilots in general. -Cory Dan Luke wrote: : "Chip Jones" wrote: : In most locations, like in Houston, this controller : attitude is pathetically laughable. : Yes, it's bad in Houston; I never ask them for advisories anymore. Even : if they do take you, they may fail to call traffic. : But if you listen to their frequencies on a nice Friday afternoon, you : can almost understand their attitude. The miserable radio technique of : a lot of VFR pilots can really clog up the air. It's embarassing to : listen to, sometimes. : -- : Dan : C172RG at BFM -- ************************************************** *********************** * The prime directive of Linux: * * - learn what you don't know, * * - teach what you do. * * (Just my 20 USm$) * ************************************************** *********************** |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ... I've recently had a discussion with my A&P/IA about this. He routinely hops in his turbo arrow, and flies from Virginia to Key West VFR at 11000' without talking to a soul. A violation of FAR 91.159(a). Right over top of Class-C and Class-B. What he says, (and I tend to agree with him anymore), is if you talk to them, even if you're clear of their airspace, they'll try to route you over hell and gone. Possibly an error on ATC's part over the top of Class C airspace, definitely an error on their part over Class B airspace. Having flown under and over Chicago's airspace, a number of times, you find this more often than not. Rather than encouraging the additional safety of flight following, this really discourages working with the approach controllers. Same thing talking with Milwaukee approach every time I've gone up there. I'm coming lakeshore from the south, planning to go just outside of their Class-C on my way in to Capitol, also just outside their Class-C. If I talk to them, they'll route me 10 miles to the west, every time... even without traffic conflict. Class C services are provided to participating VFR traffic in the outer area just as they are in the Class C proper, but without conflicting IFR traffic they have no basis upon which to move you. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hell.. its not just the VFR's who are messin up...
In a 2.4 hour jaunt today from the houston area, to north of Beaumont and back, I heard a military fighter jock miss a turn-in call and I also heard a corporate miss theirs as well. I heard two different people try to use the same xponder code (yea, it was VFR). AND this was in the middle of a push. Of course, the answer is more controllers... I'm not holding my breath. Dave Dan Luke wrote: "Chip Jones" wrote: In most locations, like in Houston, this controller attitude is pathetically laughable. Yes, it's bad in Houston; I never ask them for advisories anymore. Even if they do take you, they may fail to call traffic. But if you listen to their frequencies on a nice Friday afternoon, you can almost understand their attitude. The miserable radio technique of a lot of VFR pilots can really clog up the air. It's embarassing to listen to, sometimes. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave S" wrote in message hlink.net... In a 2.4 hour jaunt today from the houston area, to north of Beaumont and back, I heard a military fighter jock miss a turn-in call and I also heard a corporate miss theirs as well. I heard two different people try to use the same xponder code (yea, it was VFR). AND this was in the middle of a push. Of course, the answer is more controllers... I'm not holding my breath. Why is the answer more controllers? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave S" wrote:
In a 2.4 hour jaunt today from the houston area, to north of Beaumont and back, I heard a military fighter jock miss a turn-in call and I also heard a corporate miss theirs as well. Well, that'll happen to the best of us! What really makes me cringe is a pilot forcing a controller to play "20 Questions," as in this exchange I heard passing New Orleans one day: "New Orleans approach, Cessna [blocked]." "Cessna calling New Orleans say again." "Cessna 1234P." "Cessna 1234P, say request." "Uh, Cessna 1234P is with you and we would like flight following." "Cessna 1234P, say your type aircraft, location, destination and cruise altitude." [long pause, with nearly audible sound of controller's foot tapping] "Cessna 1234P is is coming from Reserve at 1,400." "Cessna 1234P, say destination and cruise altitude." "Uh, we're going to Picayune." [etc., etc.] New Orleans is the most easygoing of the Class Bs I frequent, and the long-suffering controller handled this guy with saintly patience, but this kind of thing is what makes VFR aircraft 2nd-class citizens in the eyes of many controllers. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Logging approaches | Ron Garrison | Instrument Flight Rules | 109 | March 2nd 04 05:54 PM |
FAA letter on flight into known icing | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 78 | December 22nd 03 07:44 PM |
Sim time loggable? | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | December 6th 03 07:47 AM |
IFR flight plan filing question | Tune2828 | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | July 23rd 03 03:33 AM |