If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#201
|
|||
|
|||
Tarver Engineering wrote:
"L Smith" wrote in message hlink.net... I asked you to point out where you believe Darwinian theory is in error. 1) Darwin's "Origin of Species" is not a scientific theory, as it fails to meet the terms of the scientific method. 2) Geological evidence proves to beyond a shadow of a doubt that the processes laid out in Darwin's "Origin of Species" are false. 3) The State of Georgia teaching Creation straight from Genesis is closer to a modern scientific theory than Darwin's "Origin of Species". 4) Darwin's notional hypotesis is false even by the admission of biologists. And your evidence for these statements, all of which are opinion rather than fact. 1) Darwin's development of his theory is one of the clearest applications of the scientific method that I know of. The revisions that have come since then are further examples of science at its best. 2) Geological evidence was used in the development of the theory, and so far nothing from geology has been found that clearly contradicts the theory. 3) I'm afraid that Georgia is not a well-known and widely respected scientific expert. 4) Considering that evolution is a fundamental part of biology, I find your last statement somewhat surprising. I've known of several biologists who believed that there were still questions that evolutionary theory had not yet answered, but that is a far cry from claiming the theory is wrong. Rich Lemert |
#202
|
|||
|
|||
"Otis Winslow" wrote in message .. . "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... Fiscal conservatism and a strong resistence to government redistribution are two consrvative sentiments libertarians share. Absolutely. And that's a bad thing? Not to me, but those policies are incompatable with socialism. |
#203
|
|||
|
|||
"darwin smith" wrote in message k.net... Tarver Engineering wrote: "L Smith" wrote in message hlink.net... I asked you to point out where you believe Darwinian theory is in error. 1) Darwin's "Origin of Species" is not a scientific theory, as it fails to meet the terms of the scientific method. 2) Geological evidence proves to beyond a shadow of a doubt that the processes laid out in Darwin's "Origin of Species" are false. 3) The State of Georgia teaching Creation straight from Genesis is closer to a modern scientific theory than Darwin's "Origin of Species". 4) Darwin's notional hypotesis is false even by the admission of biologists. And your evidence for these statements, all of which are opinion rather than fact. The geological evidence has ended any question as to the validity of Darwin's quaint little story. It is not opinion, but hard physical evidence. 1) Darwin's development of his theory is one of the clearest applications of the scientific method that I know of. Nope, biologists have to ignore the scientific method to even consider Darwin's "Origin of Species" a theory at all, as Darwin's notional hypothesis fails to meet the criterion of "experimantally demonstrable and repeatable" required to be a theory. This is my last reply here at rai, as this is way off topic and I don't expect you will change your religous beliefs based on hard physical evidence, or for any other reason. |
#204
|
|||
|
|||
What, exactly, then, do conservatives want?
Freedom. "There ought to be limits to freedom" -George W. Bush |
#205
|
|||
|
|||
I believe what I believe. You believe what you believe. Few of us will
change our minds, unless we have no convictions to start with. -- Gene Seibel Hangar 131 - http://pad39a.com/gene/plane.html Because I fly, I envy no one. "Chicken Bone" wrote in message tnews.com... Flightinfo.com asked for pilots political orientation. Results: Democrat 22.97% Republican 57.24% Ind. 19.79% http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthr...threadid=21699 |
#206
|
|||
|
|||
"Gene Seibel" wrote in message om... I believe what I believe. You believe what you believe. Few of us will change our minds, unless we have no convictions to start with. -- I have never been convicted of anything. No one saw me do it. You can't prove it. The sheep are lying. |
#207
|
|||
|
|||
"C J Campbell" wrote in message
... I have never been convicted of anything. No one saw me do it. You can't prove it. The sheep are lying. Does that mean it's going to rain? |
#208
|
|||
|
|||
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote: most of your little troll friends at talk.origins are smart enough to run when they see me posting. Another lie. I have science on my side and no reason to lie. the science where you claim a spoiler is a flap; and a spoiler is a wing that creates negative lift? or the science where you claim a flap "thickens" a wing? or the science where you claim that "average" and "total" are interchangeable terms? |
#209
|
|||
|
|||
Dan,
Look up Tarver on Google. He is a long time troll who never bothers to back up any of his arguments except with rambling non-sensical "statements of fact". Give it up. Michael "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote: Another lie. I have science on my side Another lie. and no reason to lie. Then apparently it's just your nature. Try posting there again. If what you just said is the truth, you should get little or no response. I cross post to talk.origins every few months. It is a kook bin full of retards spewing 150 year old dog breeder science and an ocasional qualified biologist. The biologist usually admits that there are big problems with Darwin's "Origin of Species", but "it demonstrates how one thing might replace another". Although demonstrating a concept has value, theaching religion as science is not the way to do it. More lies. You're afraid. |
#210
|
|||
|
|||
"Michael 182" wrote in message news:uQWgc.161786$gA5.1908220@attbi_s03... "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote: Another lie. I have science on my side Another lie. and no reason to lie. Then apparently it's just your nature. Try posting there again. If what you just said is the truth, you should get little or no response. I cross post to talk.origins every few months. It is a kook bin full of retards spewing 150 year old dog breeder science and an ocasional qualified biologist. The biologist usually admits that there are big problems with Darwin's "Origin of Species", but "it demonstrates how one thing might replace another". Although demonstrating a concept has value, theaching religion as science is not the way to do it. More lies. You're afraid. Dan, Look up Tarver on Google. You will find an archive troll which has been largely ineffective. There was a second archive troll, but the paradox in that one has been revealed. He is a long time troll who never bothers to back up any of his arguments except with rambling non-sensical "statements of fact". Give it up. I have provided Dan with enough information to do his own google search. It doesn't really matter to me whether Dan has an interest in the scientific truth of the matter, or not. Jay Gould spent a number of years trying to reconcile the hard physical Geological evidence through a notional hypothesis similar to Darwin's, except Gould's rapid evolution might have happened; while Darwin's evolution into a new species slowly over a long period of time is false. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
Bush Pilots Fly-In. South Africa. | Bush Air | Home Built | 0 | May 25th 04 06:18 AM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
Photographer seeking 2 pilots / warbirds for photo shoot | Wings Of Fury | Aerobatics | 0 | February 26th 04 05:59 PM |