If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message
... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 14:24:26 -0000, "Chris" wrote: No I am not suggesting that but the practice is not recommended by the FAA as per the examiners handbook; Would this be parsed as (1) "not recommended" by the FAA, or (2) not "recommended by the FAA"? Those parsings strike me as identical. It would be different to say "advised against" by the FAA. (Sometimes, people water down "advised against" by saying "not recommended" instead, leaving themselves room to retreat if challenged. But that usage, too, could apply to both parsings.) --Gary |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Checkride - Passed, but the bubble did burst a bit | Matt Young | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | November 7th 04 03:57 AM |
Tips on Getting Your Instrument Rating Sooner and at Lower Cost | Fred | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | October 19th 04 07:31 AM |
Instrument checkride (long) | Vitaly Shmatikov | Instrument Flight Rules | 9 | July 19th 04 06:05 AM |
Logging approaches | Ron Garrison | Instrument Flight Rules | 109 | March 2nd 04 05:54 PM |
Instrument Rating Ground School at Central Jersey Regional (47N) | john price | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | October 12th 03 12:25 PM |