If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave S" wrote...
Im sure the military does it all the time.. However.. practically.. WHO is going to be responsible for separation on a formation flight if it goes IMC? The military has procedures that address this.. i am curious to know if the US civil sector does, and I've not seen anything pertaining to it.. Anyone care to expand on the DETAILS of actually doing a formation under IFR in IMC or VMC? Indeed, the military has numerous procedures that address IFR flight in formations. I'm sure the Army, Navy, and Air Force have their own specific procedures, but in general: It begins with dedicated VMC formation flying practice early in training, then expands to IFR/IMC formation procedures. In an IFR formation, the flight is treated by ATC as a single airplane. Responsibility for separation between the separate elements in the flight is on the formation leader. It is possible and permissible to fly an approach and landing in formation with tactical (small) aircraft. Generally, IFR formation landings are limited to 2 airplanes, and approach minimums may be higher than those for single aircraft. When weather is below formation approach & landing minimums, the flight will separate into 2 single-aircraft flights prior to the approach. It is essentially the same as one of the airplanes asking for a "popup" IFR clearance. The flight remains together (either enroute or in holding) until the separate clearances are obtained. Then the second aircraft starts squawking his own discrete code and follows his own clearance with regard to altitude and route. I don't know if there are separate civil procedures; the concept should be the same. However, I don't know how the FAA looks on intentional civil IFR/IMC formation flight in the first place, especially with regard to FAR 91.13... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
new theory of flight released Sept 2004 | Mark Oliver | Aerobatics | 1 | October 5th 04 10:20 PM |
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP | vvcd | Home Built | 0 | September 22nd 04 07:16 PM |
FAA letter on flight into known icing | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 78 | December 22nd 03 07:44 PM |
Sim time loggable? | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | December 6th 03 07:47 AM |