If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... Actually, it is the duty of the pilot to see that his passengers do not become intoxicated during the flight. If they do, then you have already violated the regulations. Which ones? 91.17 |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
"C J Campbell" wrote in message ... "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... Actually, it is the duty of the pilot to see that his passengers do not become intoxicated during the flight. If they do, then you have already violated the regulations. Which ones? 91.17 I know several people that won't fly if they're NOT intoxicated (my mother-in-law). My boss's idea of "on board refreshments" is a six pack of Diet RC. Mine, too. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
"C J Campbell" wrote in message
... Ejecting someone in mid-air would violate the regulations unless the pilot has first determined that there will be no damage to persons or property below. Not if the PIC declares an emergency. Then he can dispense with the FARs, and, it would seem, the drunks too. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
C J Campbell wrote: Ejecting someone in mid-air would violate the regulations unless the pilot has first determined that there will be no damage to persons or property below. If you eject someone, they will rapidly become a "person below", so I think it fairly obvious that there will be such damage. George Patterson None of us is as dumb as all of us. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
C J Campbell wrote: "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... Actually, it is the duty of the pilot to see that his passengers do not become intoxicated during the flight. If they do, then you have already violated the regulations. Which ones? 91.17 91.17 "No pilot ... may allow a person who appears to be intoxicated... to be carried in the aircraft." I suppose it is ok if the intoxicated person is sober enough to crawl in the aircraft. :-) |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
What if they ask you to prove you were not acting as PIC? how would you
prove that you were not PIC if you had a set of controls in front of you? "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "Teacherjh" wrote in message ... [...] I'd be really heasitant to be a passenger on part 91 if I had a drink, unless I did NOT have a pilot certificate. Are you also afraid that, should your medical lapse or be invalid (taking OTC cold medicine, for example), the FAA would come after you if you were a passenger in an aircraft in which there had been an accident? Maybe you are. I personally would have no worries. If I'm intoxicated, I clearly don't meet the requirements for acting as PIC. How could the FAA possibly accuse me of being at fault in an accident during which I was not manipulating the controls, and during which I was ineligible to act as PIC? Even the popular urban legends of higher-rated pilots being held responsible for accidents caused by a lower-rated acting PIC are overblown. I've never heard of a situation in which a higher-rated pilot that wasn't legal to act as PIC was held responsible. Pete |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
"NW_PILOT" wrote in message
... What if they ask you to prove you were not acting as PIC? how would you prove that you were not PIC if you had a set of controls in front of you? It is their burden to prove that you WERE acting as PIC. That would be pretty difficult for them if you've got another pilot who was in the airplane at the controls claiming that they were acting as PIC, especially if that pilot was qualified to act as PIC while you were not. Pete |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
"m pautz" wrote in message news:xTkCc.134276$3x.18672@attbi_s54... C J Campbell wrote: "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... Actually, it is the duty of the pilot to see that his passengers do not become intoxicated during the flight. If they do, then you have already violated the regulations. Which ones? 91.17 91.17 "No pilot ... may allow a person who appears to be intoxicated... to be carried in the aircraft." I suppose it is ok if the intoxicated person is sober enough to crawl in the aircraft. :-) And the point (I think) was SERVING alcohol, and the regulation infers allowing a passenger to board when already intoxicated. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Tom Sixkiller wrote: "m pautz" wrote in message news:xTkCc.134276$3x.18672@attbi_s54... C J Campbell wrote: "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... Actually, it is the duty of the pilot to see that his passengers do not become intoxicated during the flight. If they do, then you have already violated the regulations. Which ones? 91.17 91.17 "No pilot ... may allow a person who appears to be intoxicated... to be carried in the aircraft." I suppose it is ok if the intoxicated person is sober enough to crawl in the aircraft. :-) And the point (I think) was SERVING alcohol, and the regulation infers allowing a passenger to board when already intoxicated. My post was tongue-in-cheek. Since the the FARs don't have a definition for "carried" in section 1.1, 91.17 is, tongue-in-cheek, vague and could be interpretted to mean hand-carried in(to) the airplane. I waited until all of the serious posts were complete before diverting the topic with my meaningless post. As has already been pointed out, there are no regs against serving alcohol. 91.17 means "'transported' in an aircraft", not "carried into". As CJ pointed out, this means that a pilot cannot allow a passenger to start out intoxicated or become intoxicated while being carried in that plane. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
WINGS: When do the clocks start ticking? | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 6 | February 3rd 04 03:01 PM |
FAA letter on flight into known icing | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 78 | December 22nd 03 07:44 PM |
Sim time loggable? | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | December 6th 03 07:47 AM |
CFI logging instrument time | Barry | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | November 11th 03 12:23 AM |