If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Spinnable trainers (Was ASK 21 spin ballast installation)
Stefan wrote:
Marc Ramsey wrote: Technique that has worked for me in just about every 21 or 103 I've ... Thanks, I'll try that as soon as spring is coming. Not exactly the kind of spin entry you're looking for in an aerobatic program, though. True, but it is the kind of spin entry one might be looking at if one is a bit ham-fisted coming out of a slipping turn to final... |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Spinnable trainers (Was ASK 21 spin ballast installation)
At 21:12 01 March 2006, Marc Ramsey wrote:
Stefan wrote: Chuck Griswold wrote: Why would you use tail ballast to instruct aerobatics? You wouldn't have guessed it: To do simple erect spins. I am aware that some pilots claim to have been able to spin the 21 without the tail ballast. I'm not among them. Technique that has worked for me in just about every 21 or 103 I've tried it (and I weigh 95 kg or so): Establish a stable slip, nose slightly higher than normal, for purposes of this discussion, left wing down. Apply full left rudder, at same time move stick fully right and back. No need to jerk the controls, quick smooth movements are all that is needed. You might have to play with the slip angle a bit... Yep that will work as will sitting a Grob 103 on the stall buffet and applying full left rudder and full right aileron and stick back. Will not work to the right very well because of the asymetric nature of the Grob rudder and the most you will get from either technique is half a turn unless the front cockpit weight is very low. The initial pitch down and roll can be very dramatic but after that it is very benign. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Spinnable trainers (Was ASK 21 spin ballast installation)
Don Johnstone wrote:
At 21:12 01 March 2006, Marc Ramsey wrote: Stefan wrote: Chuck Griswold wrote: Why would you use tail ballast to instruct aerobatics? You wouldn't have guessed it: To do simple erect spins. I am aware that some pilots claim to have been able to spin the 21 without the tail ballast. I'm not among them. Technique that has worked for me in just about every 21 or 103 I've tried it (and I weigh 95 kg or so): Establish a stable slip, nose slightly higher than normal, for purposes of this discussion, left wing down. Apply full left rudder, at same time move stick fully right and back. No need to jerk the controls, quick smooth movements are all that is needed. You might have to play with the slip angle a bit... Yep that will work as will sitting a Grob 103 on the stall buffet and applying full left rudder and full right aileron and stick back. Will not work to the right very well because of the asymetric nature of the Grob rudder and the most you will get from either technique is half a turn unless the front cockpit weight is very low. The initial pitch down and roll can be very dramatic but after that it is very benign. There is a pretty good web site on this topic at http://ocglider.com/Grob_spin_avis.htm worth a look. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Spinnable trainers (Was ASK 21 spin ballast installation)
Wear a chute. I spent alot of time at Estrella in the late 80's. During that time, the guy who owned the place, Les Horvath, just about spun in a Grob 103. Les is an extremely talented and experienced acro pilot. He was intentionally demonstrating a spin while doing a cockpit checkout for a new instructor. If I am not mistaken, this was the technique he used to spin the 103. The spin went flat and was not recoverable except by the rear passenger unbuckling his belts and throwing himself forward over the rear instrument panel to move the CG. Afterwards he told me personally that he would have bailed out if he had a chute on. He was that convinced they were not going to get it unstuck. I think it's just a plain old good idea to wear one any time this serious of a maneuver is to be attempted. Mark "Stefan" wrote in message ... Marc Ramsey wrote: Technique that has worked for me in just about every 21 or 103 I've ... Thanks, I'll try that as soon as spring is coming. Not exactly the kind of spin entry you're looking for in an aerobatic program, though. Stefan |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Spinnable trainers (Was ASK 21 spin ballast installation)
Hard to imagine a spin that didn't exceed 60 degrees
of bank and 30 degrees of pitch at some point. Surely that makes a chute mandatory under FAR's? I had a spin go flat in a Grob Twin II (essentially an early version of the Grob 103) when conducting aft C of G spin tests for UK certification around 1980. Didn't quite get to the point of unstrapping and leaning forward, but it took about three turns of cycling the stick back and forward to 'rock' it out (that's after the point where it had flattened noticably and a normal recovery hadn't worked). I was certainly close to the decidion to bale out. Careful re-weighing and re-calculation confirmed it was on aft C of G, but not beyond. Communication with the manufacturer produced a flat denial that any such thing had occured during testing in Germany. Further careful tests, approaching the same condition gradually, over a number of flights, eventually resulted in an uneventful spin and recovery with exactly the same conditions of weight and balance as those when the problem occurred. 'Rogue' spins are very rare, but they can occurr. Most of the other accounts of them that I have heard relate to normally very benign types, such as most of the Grob varients. At 00:30 03 March 2006, Mark Lenox wrote: Wear a chute. I spent alot of time at Estrella in the late 80's. During that time, the guy who owned the place, Les Horvath, just about spun in a Grob 103. Les is an extremely talented and experienced acro pilot. He was intentionally demonstrating a spin while doing a cockpit checkout for a new instructor. If I am not mistaken, this was the technique he used to spin the 103. The spin went flat and was not recoverable except by the rear passenger unbuckling his belts and throwing himself forward over the rear instrument panel to move the CG. Afterwards he told me personally that he would have bailed out if he had a chute on. He was that convinced they were not going to get it unstuck. I think it's just a plain old good idea to wear one any time this serious of a maneuver is to be attempted. Mark 'Stefan' wrote in message ... Marc Ramsey wrote: Technique that has worked for me in just about every 21 or 103 I've ... Thanks, I'll try that as soon as spring is coming. Not exactly the kind of spin entry you're looking for in an aerobatic program, though. Stefan |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Spinnable trainers (Was ASK 21 spin ballast installation)
Mark Lenox wrote:
Wear a chute. *Always* wear a chute, not only when spinning! Aerobatics, even spinning, is pretty safe compared with cross country flying. In Europe, almost all glider pilots always wear chutes. Not because it's mandatory (it's not, in most countries even not for aerobatics), but because, well, just because we do. Over the years, those chutes have saved many lives. Almost all bail outs were done after midairs, I'm not aware of one caused by an unrecoverable spin. Stefan |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Spinnable trainers (Was ASK 21 spin ballast installation)
Chutes are not required for spin training if done by a flight instructor for
maneuvers required by the regulations for a particular certificate. FAR 91.307d2i So, for one possible example, if you were getting the spin training requirements taken care of in preparation for a CFI checkride (which requires spin training), the parachute requirement is removed. I always wear mine. Mark "Chris Rollings" wrote in message ... Hard to imagine a spin that didn't exceed 60 degrees of bank and 30 degrees of pitch at some point. Surely that makes a chute mandatory under FAR's? I had a spin go flat in a Grob Twin II (essentially an early version of the Grob 103) when conducting aft C of G spin tests for UK certification around 1980. Didn't quite get to the point of unstrapping and leaning forward, but it took about three turns of cycling the stick back and forward to 'rock' it out (that's after the point where it had flattened noticably and a normal recovery hadn't worked). I was certainly close to the decidion to bale out. Careful re-weighing and re-calculation confirmed it was on aft C of G, but not beyond. Communication with the manufacturer produced a flat denial that any such thing had occured during testing in Germany. Further careful tests, approaching the same condition gradually, over a number of flights, eventually resulted in an uneventful spin and recovery with exactly the same conditions of weight and balance as those when the problem occurred. 'Rogue' spins are very rare, but they can occurr. Most of the other accounts of them that I have heard relate to normally very benign types, such as most of the Grob varients. At 00:30 03 March 2006, Mark Lenox wrote: Wear a chute. I spent alot of time at Estrella in the late 80's. During that time, the guy who owned the place, Les Horvath, just about spun in a Grob 103. Les is an extremely talented and experienced acro pilot. He was intentionally demonstrating a spin while doing a cockpit checkout for a new instructor. If I am not mistaken, this was the technique he used to spin the 103. The spin went flat and was not recoverable except by the rear passenger unbuckling his belts and throwing himself forward over the rear instrument panel to move the CG. Afterwards he told me personally that he would have bailed out if he had a chute on. He was that convinced they were not going to get it unstuck. I think it's just a plain old good idea to wear one any time this serious of a maneuver is to be attempted. Mark 'Stefan' wrote in message ... Marc Ramsey wrote: Technique that has worked for me in just about every 21 or 103 I've ... Thanks, I'll try that as soon as spring is coming. Not exactly the kind of spin entry you're looking for in an aerobatic program, though. Stefan |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
ASK 21 spin ballast....
jcarlyle wrote:
I'm a new PPG in the USA, and although I wasn't taught in an "unspinnable" glider...we never did that.... It was thoroughly drummed into me how to initiate spin recovery when the nose was dropping and a wing was low. ...I would categorically state that if I had ever found myself in a spin...I would definitely have gotten out of it (assuming I had the height).... There has never been any time during my flying career that I haven't been paying attention to my flying. ...the training I received resulted in me having automatic reflexes.... The ASK-21 is "unspinnable"? Wouldn't matter. Wow John, Congratulations today on completion of your sixth month as a rated pilot. It's good to have faith in yourself, your training, and your ship. Try to keep an open mind concerning all three, though, because eventually each of those faiths -- and quite possibly all three at once -- will be tried, whether on your very next flight, or on your 10,000th. Here's hoping you make 10,000 -- and that I'm around to see it. Jack (still working on my first 100 hrs, in gliders) |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
ASK 21 spin ballast....
Well thanks, Jack, I look forward to seeing you at our 10,000 hour
milestones. As you point out, I'm a believer in positive thinking. But I temper this faith by seeking out knowledge regarding potentially dangerous airborne situations, taking away a lesson from each flight, and respecting how easily flying can kill those who don't think. I try to fly relaxed but alert, and I don't push any envelopes nor do I take chances. I submit that a positive attitude is safer than cowering in the cockpit, shaking and hyperventilating, and fearing the plane will betray me at any second. The reply that you quoted from me was written to NoSpam, who said "Teaching students to fly in so called "unspinable" gliders has to be one of the the most reckless and dangerous things done [because] they won't pay attention to how well they are flying". I take it that you agree with NoSpam - being afraid is the best way to fly? -John Jack wrote: Wow John, Congratulations today on completion of your sixth month as a rated pilot. It's good to have faith in yourself, your training, and your ship. Try to keep an open mind concerning all three, though, because eventually each of those faiths -- and quite possibly all three at once -- will be tried, whether on your very next flight, or on your 10,000th. Here's hoping you make 10,000 -- and that I'm around to see it. Jack (still working on my first 100 hrs, in gliders) |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
ASK 21 spin ballast....
jcarlyle wrote:
Well thanks, Jack, I look forward to seeing you at our 10,000 hour milestones. Yours, perhaps. You missed mine. I'll be happy to get a mere thousand in Gliders. The reply that you quoted from me was written to NoSpam, who said "Teaching students to fly in so called "unspinable" gliders has to be one of the the most reckless and dangerous things done [because] they won't pay attention to how well they are flying". He could be right. I've never instructed in Gliders: perhaps he has. I believe in spin training, but there are respected opinions on both sides of the issue. People will kill themselves in any aspect of the game -- usually from the same basic cause of not being well prepared for whatever it is they encounter. When they move up to a readily spinnable single-seater, and I understand there are some, it might be a huge advantage to have spun something, even one of the more docile two-seaters, earlier in their experience. You report that confidence in your ability to deal with spins and other aircraft control issues was cemented when you finally did spins -- if I have read you correctly. That sounds like a recommendation for a spinnable trainer to me. You were just a little delayed in getting that phase of your training. I take it that you agree with NoSpam - being afraid is the best way to fly? "Nospam" didn't say anything about being afraid, and I doubt he advocates it. I can't remember being afraid in an aircraft, though there have been several instances of "heightened alertness" along the way. I have noted through the years that some people are afraid of being afraid. You say there never has been a time when you were not paying attention to your flying, but eventually there will be -- unless you quit prematurely, or simply don't take on many challenges. I hope it won't surprise you too much. Jack |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Cable break recovery spin entry... as previously discussed | [email protected] | Soaring | 26 | July 3rd 05 08:28 AM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
Cessna 150 Price Outlook | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 80 | October 16th 03 02:18 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |