A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Report Leaving Assigned Altitude?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 13th 04, 12:31 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Greg Esres" wrote in message
...

I suspect the lack of complaint from ATC is no indication that ATC is
pleased with a pilot's behavior.


Why would that behavior displease ATC?


  #2  
Old March 13th 04, 03:33 PM
Greg Esres
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Why would that behavior displease ATC?

I didn't say it would. I just said the lack of complaint is no
indication either way.

  #3  
Old March 13th 04, 06:24 AM
Jim Baker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Richard Kaplan" wrote in message
s.com...


"Stan Gosnell" me@work wrote in message
...

You can descend from 7000' to 3000' whenever you're ready, but
you need to report when you do. You would report leaving 7000'


Where is it written that any report is needed other than the initial
acknowledgment of the pilot discretion clearance? I would maintain that
acknowledging the pilot discretion clearance satisfies the requirement to
report leaving the altitude. In fact, I have on a number of occasions

done
just that and not reported to ATC when I began a pilot-discretion descent,
with no complaint from anyone.

Has anyone here ever acknowledged a pilot discretion clearance and then
started a descent at some later point and received a complaint from ATC

that
a second report was needed prior to beginning a descent?


--
--------------------
Richard Kaplan, CFII

www.flyimc.com


No. That is what the black letters all in a row that translate to "pilot
discretion" mean. I've done hundreds of them in small aircraft and heavy
(450,000+ lbs).


  #4  
Old March 13th 04, 02:16 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



No. That is what the black letters all in a row that translate to "pilot
discretion" mean. I've done hundreds of them in small aircraft and heavy
(450,000+ lbs).


I have a similar background. When I was flying the air carrier aircraft, the
company I worked for had as policy that its crews would report leaving a
previously assigned altitude, whether PD or not.

There reasoning was it removed any possibility of ambiguity.

When there are two options, and there is any doubt as to which is right (or
wrong) exercise the option that has the least cost if wrong.

  #5  
Old March 13th 04, 02:50 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message ...

I have a similar background. When I was flying the air carrier aircraft,
the company I worked for had as policy that its crews would report
leaving a previously assigned altitude, whether PD or not.

There reasoning was it removed any possibility of ambiguity.


Where was ambiguity possible?



When there are two options, and there is any doubt as to which is
right (or wrong) exercise the option that has the least cost if wrong.


What is the cost?


  #6  
Old March 13th 04, 03:38 PM
Jim Baker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message ...


No. That is what the black letters all in a row that translate to

"pilot
discretion" mean. I've done hundreds of them in small aircraft and

heavy
(450,000+ lbs).


I have a similar background. When I was flying the air carrier aircraft,

the
company I worked for had as policy that its crews would report leaving a
previously assigned altitude, whether PD or not.

There reasoning was it removed any possibility of ambiguity.

When there are two options, and there is any doubt as to which is right

(or
wrong) exercise the option that has the least cost if wrong.

I agree Sammy. I was just responding to Richard's question about whether
I'd ever received a "complaint" from ATC by starting a PD a few minutes
after receiving it wtihout notifying the controller. I usually did make a
brief "XYZ departing 190" call for precisely the reason you're speaking
about. But when I didn't, due to radio congestion, I never had any
controlling agency ask why.

JB


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
GPS Altitude with WAAS Phil Verghese Instrument Flight Rules 42 October 5th 03 12:39 AM
ALTRAK pitch system flight report optics student Home Built 2 September 21st 03 11:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.