A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pigeon guided missiles?!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old February 15th 04, 12:03 AM
Jim Doyle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Pigeon guided missiles?!

I found this earlier today, it may not be new to yourselves - but the
thought of some pigeon tapping away frantically inside a speeding missile
had me in stiches!

http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m.../article.jhtml

Hope it tickles something,

Jim Doyle

Here it is in full:
A study of missile guidance by pigeon pecking has been taken out from under
wraps by the Navy. At the same time, perhaps to calm fears of guidance
designers, the Navy made clear that the project has been discontinued.

Started during World War II, Project Orcon (for organic control) was a
try-anything approach to solving some then-current problems. Guidance
systems for homing missiles were being easily countermeasured and the Navy
thought animals might have potential as a jam-proof control element. Pigeons
were selected for trial because they were light, easily obtainable and
adaptable. Their job was to ride inside a missile and peck at an image of a
target picked up by a lens in the missile's nose. The pigeon's pecking of
the target image was translated into an error signal that corrected the
simulated missile's simulated flight.

The project was revived in 1948 and carried further. In simulated rocket
tests, the pigeons produced "surprisingly good results." The researchers
were convinced that a pigeon could successfully guide a speeding missile
under optimum conditions, compensating for his own and the missile's errors.

But after three years of equipment development and testing, the project was
abandoned because the range of the Orcon system could be no greater than the
range of any optical system and the system could be used only in the
daytime. The trainer used target images photographed in color by a jet
plane, which made picture-taking dives at a destroyer and a freighter in
open sea.

Trainee pigeons were started out in the primary trainer pecking at slowly
moving targets. They were rewarded with corn for each hit and quickly
learned that good pecking meant more food. Eventually pigeons were able to
track a target jumping back and forth at five inches per second for 80
seconds, without a break. Peck frequency turned out to be four per second,
and more than 80 percent of the pecks were within a quarter inch of the
target. The training conditions simulated missile-flight speeds of about 400
miles per hour.

The image was shown under a glass screen coated with stannic oxide to make
it electrically conducting. Through circuitry based on the Wheatstone Bridge
principle, pecks on the glass were translated into distance right and left
and up and down from the center lines.

The target was moved by a small mirror controlled by a servo. The control
circuits were such that if the pigeon stopped tracking, the target image
would drift rapidly away from the center of the screen. This forced the
pigeon to correct not only his own pecking errors, but those introduced by
the yawing of the missile. It turned out that 55.3 per cent of the runs made
were successful--that is, the pigeons were able to keep the target image on
their screens for the duration of more than half their flights.

If pigeon guidance did not get very far in the Navy, it did have one
valuable offshoot. The electrically conducting glass was later used in many
radar displays. (ELECTRONIC DESIGN, November 25, 1959, p. 16)



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does an F15E carry AGM88(HARM) missiles? Tetsuji Rai Military Aviation 8 January 30th 04 02:46 PM
Best dogfight gun? Bjørnar Bolsøy Military Aviation 317 January 24th 04 06:24 PM
Australia to participate in US missile defence program David Bromage Military Aviation 40 December 13th 03 01:52 PM
No uranium, no munitions, no missiles, no programmes Michael Petukhov Military Aviation 50 October 22nd 03 10:12 PM
Poland: French Missile Report Was Wrong Michael Petukhov Military Aviation 8 October 7th 03 10:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.