If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Minimum acceptable self-launch climb rate
The Arcus is not an Open Class glider.
The Arcus E may not be strictly "Open Class" I don't know the strict definition of "open". But the point I was trying (unsuccessfully) to make is that the 20m wings are heavy maybe even heavier than some true open class traditional gliders? Anyone who has tried to pick up an Antares20E wing will understand. Arcus E wings have 72 batteries plus associated mounting hardware, each battery has a heating mantle, there are control electronics boards every third battery plus the wiring & cooling hardware. As far as I know it has exactly the same system as the Lange built Antares 20E. (Lange built the "E" bit of the Arcus). Each battery weighs a little over a kilo so the whole lot possibly weighs 80-85 kilos, add two pilots and you get high wing loading. I understand the Arcus with full water ballast is pretty predictable; maybe a pilot with Arcus E experience could comment on the handling characteristics. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Minimum rates of climb/descent for VFR | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 113 | February 17th 08 06:42 AM |
Why Isn't Vx The Best Rate Of Climb? | RandyL | Piloting | 18 | September 28th 06 07:50 PM |
figuring Rate of Climb | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 1 | June 19th 05 03:16 AM |
Rate of climb | Dillon Pyron | Home Built | 3 | May 8th 04 01:08 PM |
Minimum rate of climb or descent | Aaron Kahn | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | July 25th 03 03:22 PM |