A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New iPAQ



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 21st 04, 07:21 PM
Jacek Kobiesa
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default New iPAQ

There is a new format of iPAQs. I just look at HP web site and the
have new (at least new to me and my knowledge) iPAQ 4705, 3715,
3115,etc. Does anyone know how they work with WinPilot and Cambridge
302 for example? How about those digital iPAQs? Looking for feedback
and information.
  #2  
Old September 22nd 04, 02:33 AM
Paul Remde
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi,

I just updated my Pocket PC comparison web site with some data on the 4705.
It looks like it uses the same connectors and cables as recent iPAQs so I'm
guessing it will work OK with a 302. I have ordered one for my testing.
They are scheduled to be available on October 6th. The bad news is they
obviously do not fit into an iPAQ expansion pack and therefore won't fit
into the very nice iPAQ cradles that are available.
http://www.cumlus-soaring.com/ppc.htm Pocket PC Comparison
http://www.cumlus-soaring.com/cumulus.htm iPAQ Cradles

Thanks,

Paul Remde
Cumulus Soaring, Inc.
http://www.cumulus-soaring.com

"Jacek Kobiesa" wrote in message
om...
There is a new format of iPAQs. I just look at HP web site and the
have new (at least new to me and my knowledge) iPAQ 4705, 3715,
3115,etc. Does anyone know how they work with WinPilot and Cambridge
302 for example? How about those digital iPAQs? Looking for feedback
and information.



  #3  
Old September 22nd 04, 05:59 PM
For Example John Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

One of the product managers for those things is a member of the Soaring Club
of Houston.
Ramke, are you out there? Care to comment?

Brent
"Jacek Kobiesa" wrote in message
om...
There is a new format of iPAQs. I just look at HP web site and the
have new (at least new to me and my knowledge) iPAQ 4705, 3715,
3115,etc. Does anyone know how they work with WinPilot and Cambridge
302 for example? How about those digital iPAQs? Looking for feedback
and information.



  #4  
Old September 23rd 04, 05:00 PM
Henryk Birecki
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jacek Kobiesa" wrote in message
om...
There is a new format of iPAQs. I just look at HP web site and the
have new (at least new to me and my knowledge) iPAQ 4705, 3715,
3115,etc. Does anyone know how they work with WinPilot and Cambridge
302 for example? How about those digital iPAQs? Looking for feedback
and information.


Any program that ran on previous versions of iPaq will run on the new
ones (check for presence of serial interface though). Display
resolution defaults to 240x320 for these programs. Whether there is
any advantage to higher resolution for soaring is in my mind
questionable. In a cockpit one can hardly see the color screens in any
case, making features smaller will just make things worse. 10%
increase in display size is not enugh to compensate. (Disclaimer) Have
not seen the new iPaqs in action.

Henryk Birecki
  #5  
Old September 23rd 04, 09:55 PM
David
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sony has just released the first PDA with an
OLED display. It's a PalmOS device that probably won't
be sold in the US. But the technology for a huge
improvement in sun light visability seems very close.

http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/200409/04-048E/
  #6  
Old September 24th 04, 04:47 PM
For Example John Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Looks like it displays black in a studio very well...
running ducking & grinning
Brent
"David" wrote in message
m...
Sony has just released the first PDA with an
OLED display. It's a PalmOS device that probably won't
be sold in the US. But the technology for a huge
improvement in sun light visability seems very close.

http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/200409/04-048E/



  #7  
Old September 26th 04, 08:15 AM
Jim Kelly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Henryk,

As a developer, aren't you able to use the pixels in the best
possible way? So if you have four times as many pixels you can
form the characters better and shrink them a little with the same
readability?? That plus the extra diagonal size should give us
quite a lot more info to see on the display at the same (yes -
inadequate . . ) legibility. Within the current HP range
(assuming that the H555x days are nearly over) HP buyers can only
choose between 3.5" and the 4" with it's high resolution 640x480
display. That's a big difference in area and a four fold increase
in 'detail'.

Looking forward to hearing of Paul's appraisal. Any one else able
to see one?

Cheers,

Jim Kelly


"Henryk Birecki" wrote in message
news "Jacek Kobiesa" wrote in
message
om...
There is a new format of iPAQs. I just look at HP web site and
the
have new (at least new to me and my knowledge) iPAQ 4705, 3715,
3115,etc. Does anyone know how they work with WinPilot and
Cambridge
302 for example? How about those digital iPAQs? Looking for
feedback
and information.


Any program that ran on previous versions of iPaq will run on the
new
ones (check for presence of serial interface though). Display
resolution defaults to 240x320 for these programs. Whether there
is
any advantage to higher resolution for soaring is in my mind
questionable. In a cockpit one can hardly see the color screens
in any
case, making features smaller will just make things worse. 10%
increase in display size is not enugh to compensate. (Disclaimer)
Have
not seen the new iPaqs in action.

Henryk Birecki

  #8  
Old September 26th 04, 06:44 PM
Henryk Birecki
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes Jim,

In principle one can trade things off. As a matter of fact GPS_LOG
WinCE will allow you to make some tradeoffs exactly because the
display is somewhat larger. But, at least I, will leave font clarity
management to Microsoft . You will still be able to choose font you
like.

I will still stick to my 1550 for as long as I can.

Henryk Birecki

"Jim Kelly" wrote:

Hi Henryk,

As a developer, aren't you able to use the pixels in the best
possible way? So if you have four times as many pixels you can
form the characters better and shrink them a little with the same
readability?? That plus the extra diagonal size should give us
quite a lot more info to see on the display at the same (yes -
inadequate . . ) legibility. Within the current HP range
(assuming that the H555x days are nearly over) HP buyers can only
choose between 3.5" and the 4" with it's high resolution 640x480
display. That's a big difference in area and a four fold increase
in 'detail'.

Looking forward to hearing of Paul's appraisal. Any one else able
to see one?

Cheers,

Jim Kelly


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
iPaq and LX5000 connectivity question (hardware?) Ted Wagner Soaring 1 April 22nd 04 09:29 PM
Commercial - iPAQ Cradle Changes Paul Remde Soaring 0 April 9th 04 03:29 PM
iPaq wiring, cradles and mounts for gliders - Ideas?? Jim Kelly Soaring 12 December 4th 03 11:45 PM
iPAQ h2210/h2215 Review Paul Remde Soaring 0 September 3rd 03 03:45 AM
iPaq screen viewability Raphael Warshaw Soaring 7 July 27th 03 06:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.