If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A320 with gear problem over LA
As I write this at 4:50 pm pacific time, there is a Jet
Blue A320 circling with a nose gear problem. It's rotated 90 degrees. The news is carrying live video of the plane, but details aren't fixed. It may be landing at Long Beach or LAX. It was bound for JFK from Burbank so it has several hours of fuel on board. There's talk about dumping fuel or burning it off, but again the reports aren't clear. Jet Blue flight 292. Oh, and the talking heads are really a laugh. "So I take it the nose gear on all big jets can turn?" duh....how do you think they steer? Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Skywise" wrote in message
... As I write this at 4:50 pm pacific time, there is a Jet Blue A320 circling with a nose gear problem. It's rotated 90 degrees. The news is carrying live video of the plane, but details aren't fixed. It may be landing at Long Beach or LAX. It was bound for JFK from Burbank so it has several hours of fuel on board. There's talk about dumping fuel or burning it off, but again the reports aren't clear. Jet Blue flight 292. Oh, and the talking heads are really a laugh. "So I take it the nose gear on all big jets can turn?" duh....how do you think they steer? Brian KABC is streaming it to the web live... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
One of the talking heads just said they will foam the runway. I
thought that introduced more problems then it solved for a situation like this. My dad said he heard someone on Fox say something about a "soft tail" landing, I wonder if perhaps they meant 'soft field' landing where they hold the nose off the ground as long as possible. Ben Hallert PP-ASEL |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Skywise wrote:
As I write this at 4:50 pm pacific time, there is a Jet Blue A320 circling with a nose gear problem. It's rotated 90 degrees. The news says that A320s are designed so that they cannot dump fuel, thus this loaded plane must fly around for a while to burn off some. Anyone know why the A320 is designed that way? Good luck to the crew, btw. Watching it on TV, watching arrivals on Airport Monitor, and listening via Live ATC. What a world! Kev |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Kev" wrote
The news says that A320s are designed so that they cannot dump fuel, thus this loaded plane must fly around for a while to burn off some. Anyone know why the A320 is designed that way? (a) A fuel jettisoning system must be installed on each airplane unless it is shown that the airplane meets the climb requirements of §§25.119 and 25.121(d) at maximum takeoff weight, less the actual or computed weight of fuel necessary for a 15-minute flight comprised of a takeoff, go-around, and landing at the airport of departure with the airplane configuration, speed, power, and thrust the same as that used in meeting the applicable takeoff, approach, and landing climb performance requirements of this part. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Jay Beckman wrote:
KABC is streaming it to the web live... Thanks for the heads up, this was a great resource at work. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Moore wrote:
"Kev" wrote The news says that A320s are designed so that they cannot dump fuel, thus this loaded plane must fly around for a while to burn off some. Anyone know why the A320 is designed that way? (a) A fuel jettisoning system must be installed on each airplane unless it is shown that the airplane meets the climb requirements of =A7=A725.119 a= nd 25.121(d) at maximum takeoff weight, less the actual or computed weight of fuel necessary for a 15-minute flight comprised of a takeoff, go-around, and landing at the airport of departure with the airplane configuration, speed, power, and thrust the same as that used in meeting the applicable takeoff, approach, and landing climb performance requirements of this par= t=2E Aha. Thanks so much! It never hit me that dumping fuel would be related to a climb requirement. I was thinking of max landing weight, or dumping fuel if you need to make an emergency landing (as in this case). Kev |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Ben Hallert" wrote in news:1127347757.850538.311870
@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: One of the talking heads just said they will foam the runway. I thought that introduced more problems then it solved for a situation like this. My dad said he heard someone on Fox say something about a "soft tail" landing, I wonder if perhaps they meant 'soft field' landing where they hold the nose off the ground as long as possible. Ben Hallert PP-ASEL I'm watching ch 7 (KABC) and they're saying 'soft field'. BTW, it appears that they are circling to burn off fuel as the A320 cannot dump fuel. But the setting sun will be becoming a problem as time goes on as the current plan is to land at 25L at LAX, into the setting sun. Oh, and the LAPD has just gone to city wide tactical alert. A bit overkill, I think. It's not a terrorist attack. It's just a plane making a rougher landing than usual. Unless something goes drastically wrong, I think they'll pull through just fine. Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Kev" wrote in news:1127348824.014065.179670
@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: Snipola Good luck to the crew, btw. Watching it on TV, watching arrivals on Airport Monitor, and listening via Live ATC. What a world! Kev Anything of interest heard on Live ATC? I can't connect. Too busy. Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Ben Hallert wrote:
One of the talking heads just said they will foam the runway. I thought that introduced more problems then it solved for a situation like this. I just heard on KABC an interview with an official from the LA fire department, Jim Wells, who confirmed that they are not foaming the runways. The radio host must have asked him at least a dozen times, "So you're not going to foam the runway?" Wells started running low on patience, "No, we are NOT foaming the runway." Wells said that they are currently anticipating a landing around 6:05-6:10pm PT. They said they will run firetrucks along with the plane as it lands and foam the plane if necessary. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Yet another alternator problem | Chris Kennedy | Owning | 7 | July 16th 04 04:28 PM |
Nose gear failure | Greg Esres | Owning | 12 | April 20th 04 11:03 PM |
Garmin fixes moving waypoint problem -- almost | Jon Woellhaf | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | November 28th 03 05:29 PM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart D. Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 22nd 03 06:24 AM |
Landing gear door operation | Elliot Wilen | Naval Aviation | 11 | July 7th 03 03:47 PM |