If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Newps wrote in message news:0jTdc.112869$K91.324392@attbi_s02...
You don't take a visual approach until you're sure you can find the airport visually. You don't accept a visual until you can actually see the aiport. That constitutes being sure you can find it, UNLESS you can also see that you won't be able to see the airport between "now" and the time you land (e.g. you can see it through a hole in the overcast). Being able to see the aiport isn't enough. You need to be sure you can find it and land at it. It's very unusual, and not a good idea, to accept or request a visual approach if you're not already sure you can make it. No it's not. There's no reason to be sure you'll get the visual to request to go have a look see at the MVA. Going lower is not the same as accepting a visual approach. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Newps wrote in message news:0jTdc.112869$K91.324392@attbi_s02...
You don't take a visual approach until you're sure you can find the airport visually. You don't accept a visual until you can actually see the aiport. That constitutes being sure you can find it, UNLESS you can also see that you won't be able to see the airport between "now" and the time you land (e.g. you can see it through a hole in the overcast). Being able to see the aiport isn't enough. You need to be sure you can find it and land at it. It's very unusual, and not a good idea, to accept or request a visual approach if you're not already sure you can make it. No it's not. There's no reason to be sure you'll get the visual to request to go have a look see at the MVA. Going lower is not the same as accepting a visual approach. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Newps wrote in message news:0jTdc.112869$K91.324392@attbi_s02...
You don't accept a visual until you can actually see the aiport. You can be vectored for a visual because you don't yet see the airport but reasonably expect you might if you can get closer. Scott, I'm finding this very confusing. Can you direct me to where it says I must actually see the airport to accept a visual approach? We've been cleared for a visual approach many times when more than 10 miles from a non-towered airport w/out an IAP. The airport was definately not in sight. No vectoring was involved. Cheers, Sydney |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I don't know about the rest of ye all, but the real world out here is to be vectored as low as the controller can give you, get the airport in sight, and "cancelling IFR". That way the 1000 & 3 does not apply. Jim Roy Smith shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: - -The MSA has little to do with it. The MSA is an emergency altitude with -no regulatory meaning (at least in the US). What's important is that -you've got the weather minimums for a visual approach (1000 & 3) and -that ATC can issue you a clearance to descend low enough that you can -see the airport (or the aircraft you're following). Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Jim Weir" wrote in message ... I don't know about the rest of ye all, but the real world out here is to be vectored as low as the controller can give you, get the airport in sight, and "cancelling IFR". That way the 1000 & 3 does not apply. It does if your destination is in a surface area. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 11:33:20 -0700, Jim Weir wrote:
I don't know about the rest of ye all, but the real world out here is to be vectored as low as the controller can give you, get the airport in sight, and "cancelling IFR". That way the 1000 & 3 does not apply. Jim Yes, but you have to maintain VMC, whereas on a visual approach under IFR, that is not a requirement, so long as you maintain the field in sight. In other words, you don't have to maintain VFR cloud clearance requirements while enroute from your present position to the field. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Ron Rosenfeld wrote in
: On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 11:33:20 -0700, Jim Weir wrote: I don't know about the rest of ye all, but the real world out here is to be vectored as low as the controller can give you, get the airport in sight, and "cancelling IFR". That way the 1000 & 3 does not apply. Jim Yes, but you have to maintain VMC, whereas on a visual approach under IFR, that is not a requirement, so long as you maintain the field in sight. In other words, you don't have to maintain VFR cloud clearance requirements while enroute from your present position to the field. Or you can have the preceding aircrat in sight. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On 10 Apr 2004 03:18:21 GMT, Andrew Sarangan wrote:
Or you can have the preceding aircrat in sight. Exactly. IOW, you don't have to be in VMC. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Careful on that one.
"Jim Weir" wrote in message ... I don't know about the rest of ye all, but the real world out here is to be vectored as low as the controller can give you, get the airport in sight, and "cancelling IFR". That way the 1000 & 3 does not apply. Jim Roy Smith shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: - -The MSA has little to do with it. The MSA is an emergency altitude with -no regulatory meaning (at least in the US). What's important is that -you've got the weather minimums for a visual approach (1000 & 3) and -that ATC can issue you a clearance to descend low enough that you can -see the airport (or the aircraft you're following). Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Uhh, I'd check that one. A year or two ago there was an article in IFR or IFR
Refresher about this subject. FAA busted some guy who cancelled when clear of the clouds because he was not legal for VFR. IIRC, the guy busted had like 750 and 6+. The gist of the article was that unless you were in legal VFR you can't cancel in the air. Otis Winslow wrote: Careful on that one. "Jim Weir" wrote in message ... I don't know about the rest of ye all, but the real world out here is to be vectored as low as the controller can give you, get the airport in sight, and "cancelling IFR". That way the 1000 & 3 does not apply. Jim -- --Ray Andraka, P.E. President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc. 401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950 http://www.andraka.com "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Report Leaving Assigned Altitude? | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 81 | March 20th 04 02:34 PM |
Night over water | Stuart King | Instrument Flight Rules | 43 | March 4th 04 01:13 AM |
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |
Visual Appr. | Stuart King | Instrument Flight Rules | 15 | September 17th 03 08:36 PM |