If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
So on the SHR ILS/DME 32, the missed approach point for the circling
approach is 1.5 DME from I-SHR. Do you always assume that the last fix on the profile view is the MAP for the non-precision approach on the ILS plate? Usually non-precision MAPs coincide with the beginning of the runway, but not always. Anyhow, just wondering if that can become ambiguous in some corner cases. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Dan Wegman wrote: I just noticed an approach to Frederick, MD (FDK) entitled "ILS OR LOC RWY 23". I thought every ILS could be flown as a non-precision LOC approach so why not just call this one the "ILS RWY 23"? The naming convention was changed to conform with Jeppesen's view of what the rest of the world does in this regard. Stay tuned. ;-) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPS approach question | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 08 03:54 AM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? | S. Ramirez | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | April 2nd 04 11:13 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 09:03 PM |