A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » Aviation Images » Aviation Photos
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Before Help Arrived



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 16th 09, 01:24 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Mitchell Holman Mitchell Holman is offline
Banned
 
First recorded activity by AviationBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,194
Default Before Help Arrived



Down in the Hudson





Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	US Air.jpg
Views:	126
Size:	165.4 KB
ID:	32251  
  #2  
Old January 16th 09, 06:44 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Herman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 260
Default Before Help Arrived


"Mitchell Holman" schreef in bericht
...


Down in the Hudson




Remarkable demonstration of airmanship by that pilot.
Do you think anyone would have moving pictures of the actual forced landing?

Regards,
Herman


  #3  
Old January 16th 09, 10:42 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Mitchell Holman Mitchell Holman is offline
Banned
 
First recorded activity by AviationBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,194
Default Before Help Arrived

"Herman" wrote in
b.home.nl:


"Mitchell Holman" schreef in bericht
...


Down in the Hudson




Remarkable demonstration of airmanship by that pilot.
Do you think anyone would have moving pictures of the actual forced
landing?

Regards,
Herman



The whole thing happened pretty quickly, I doubt
there is any footage of the actual landing.




\
  #4  
Old January 17th 09, 12:17 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Glenn[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,087
Default Before Help Arrived

So while everyone was able to succesfully get off, why were there no
Liferafts ?


"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
...


Down in the Hudson





  #5  
Old January 17th 09, 12:46 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Robert Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 134
Default Before Help Arrived

"Glenn" wrote
So while everyone was able to succesfully get off, why were there no
Liferafts ?


Not required......

FAR 1:
Extended over-water operation means—

(1) With respect to aircraft other than helicopters, an operation over
water at a horizontal distance of more than 50 nautical miles from the
nearest shoreline;


Section 121.339: Emergency equipment for extended over-water operations.

No person may operate an airplane in extended overwater operations
without having on the airplane the following equipment:

(1) A life preserver equipped with an approved survivor locator light,
for each occupant of the airplane.

(2) Enough life rafts (each equipped with an approved survivor locator
light) of a rated capacity and buoyancy to accommodate the occupants of
the airplane. Unless excess rafts of enough capacity are provided, the
buoyancy and seating capacity beyond the rated capacity of the rafts
must accommodate all occupants of the airplane in the event of a loss of
one raft of the largest rated capacity.

Section 121.340: Emergency flotation means.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no person may
operate an airplane in any overwater operation unless it is equipped
with life preservers in accordance with §121.339(a)(1) or with an
approved flotation means for each occupant. This means must be within
easy reach of each seated occupant and must be readily removable from
the airplane.

(b) Upon application by the air carrier or commercial operator, the
Administrator may approve the operation of an airplane over water
without the life preservers or flotation means required by paragraph (a)
of this section, if the air carrier or commercial operator shows that
the water over which the airplane is to be operated is not of such size
and depth that life preservers or flotation means would be required for
the survival of its occupants in the event the flight terminates in that
water



  #6  
Old January 17th 09, 04:44 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Avsec
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 86
Default Before Help Arrived

Thanks for the posting Mitchell. A good example when a picture is better
than a thousand words. What I find interesting that it occurred without a
single boat in the proximately of the ditching which could have been
fortunate under the circumstances.

Cheers,

Avsec

  #7  
Old January 17th 09, 04:45 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Orval Fairbairn[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 530
Default Before Help Arrived

In article ,
"Glenn" wrote:

So while everyone was able to succesfully get off, why were there no
Liferafts ?


From the pictures, it appears that they used the slides as rafts --
standard practice.

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.
  #8  
Old January 17th 09, 07:06 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Glenn[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,087
Default Before Help Arrived

Ok, so there is no provision provided for over land water crashes in sub
zero temperatures.

I guess we got lucky that there was a lot of vessels around that got to them
quickly.


"Robert Moore" wrote in message
5.247...
"Glenn" wrote
So while everyone was able to succesfully get off, why were there no
Liferafts ?


Not required......

FAR 1:
Extended over-water operation means-

(1) With respect to aircraft other than helicopters, an operation over
water at a horizontal distance of more than 50 nautical miles from the
nearest shoreline;


Section 121.339: Emergency equipment for extended over-water operations.

No person may operate an airplane in extended overwater operations
without having on the airplane the following equipment:

(1) A life preserver equipped with an approved survivor locator light,
for each occupant of the airplane.

(2) Enough life rafts (each equipped with an approved survivor locator
light) of a rated capacity and buoyancy to accommodate the occupants of
the airplane. Unless excess rafts of enough capacity are provided, the
buoyancy and seating capacity beyond the rated capacity of the rafts
must accommodate all occupants of the airplane in the event of a loss of
one raft of the largest rated capacity.

Section 121.340: Emergency flotation means.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no person may
operate an airplane in any overwater operation unless it is equipped
with life preservers in accordance with §121.339(a)(1) or with an
approved flotation means for each occupant. This means must be within
easy reach of each seated occupant and must be readily removable from
the airplane.

(b) Upon application by the air carrier or commercial operator, the
Administrator may approve the operation of an airplane over water
without the life preservers or flotation means required by paragraph (a)
of this section, if the air carrier or commercial operator shows that
the water over which the airplane is to be operated is not of such size
and depth that life preservers or flotation means would be required for
the survival of its occupants in the event the flight terminates in that
water




  #9  
Old January 17th 09, 12:55 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Mitchell Holman Mitchell Holman is offline
Banned
 
First recorded activity by AviationBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,194
Default Before Help Arrived

"Avsec" wrote in news:49716225$0$26849$afc38c87
@news.optusnet.com.au:

Thanks for the posting Mitchell. A good example when a picture is better
than a thousand words. What I find interesting that it occurred without a
single boat in the proximately of the ditching which could have been
fortunate under the circumstances.

Cheers,

Avsec




The fact that the pilot was also trained in gliders helped.






  #10  
Old January 17th 09, 07:46 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
nockers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default Before Help Arrived

On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:55:32 -0600, Mitchell Holman
wrote:

"Avsec" wrote in news:49716225$0$26849$afc38c87
:

Thanks for the posting Mitchell. A good example when a picture is better
than a thousand words. What I find interesting that it occurred without a
single boat in the proximately of the ditching which could have been
fortunate under the circumstances.

Cheers,

Avsec




The fact that the pilot was also trained in gliders helped.





MSNBC has some fottage of the touchdown

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28688215?gt1=43001
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The ethanol nightmare has arrived! Al[_2_] Piloting 210 April 24th 08 03:27 PM
first P-3C CUP Orion arrived at Valkenburg Marco P.J. Borst Military Aviation 1 May 27th 04 09:42 PM
first P-3C CUP Orion arrived at Valkenburg Marco P.J. Borst Naval Aviation 1 May 27th 04 09:42 PM
(long) WxWorx arrived... Tom S. Instrument Flight Rules 1 September 10th 03 12:37 AM
(long) WxWorx arrived... Dan Luke Piloting 0 September 10th 03 12:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.