If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
AUTOPILOT PROS & CONS
There are secondary effects but these are second order. If you apply
roll, the main result will be roll. The pitch change should be small. Think about this carefully. Imagine you have the plane trimmed for straight and level flight. Now let go of the controls and allow the plane to enter a spiral. Will the pitch change be small? Somehow I doubt it. When an airplane rolls, the vertical component of lift is reduced. This is a first order effect on pitch. The second order effects modify it. I think that either there is more to this, or the manufacturers are not doing the most basic analysis of the stability margin. Your latter conjecture is most likely correct. I once interviewed an electrical engineer who worked for Meggitt. If he is at all typical, they are simply not capable of doing the most basic analysis of the stability margin (of course I did not hire him). The thing which suprised me, on the KFC225, was that the software does not detect an increasing error. So, if say a roll servo goes dead, it never realises it. S-TEC's are the same. A friend of mine had a servo go intermittent, and finally die. Never got any diagnostics. I even have a couple of videos of this. The unit even passes its power-up tests, including servo tests, with a totally dead servo. I believe the only failure mode the KFC is designed to detect is a dead open circuit. Some A/P's won't even do that. I realise this isn't on the same topic as control stability but if they don't get this right then .... ? Your implication is that their design is not up to the standards you've come to expect from a professional operation. And it's not. I often wonder just what "certification" really means in this business. It means the paper is worth five times as much as the actual product. It's obvious to you how poorly autopilots are designed because you have a good understanding of the technology. If you believe that the situation is different for other aircraft components, I have a bridge I think you might be interested in purchasing. Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Experimental Catagory: Pros and Cons? | [email protected] | Soaring | 18 | April 16th 06 10:56 PM |
Long Tow Rope Pros & Cons | chris | Soaring | 7 | December 10th 03 02:30 PM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 1 | November 24th 03 02:46 PM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 2 | November 24th 03 05:23 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 24th 03 03:52 AM |