If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"john smith" wrote in message
... [...] For takeoff, the turbo should maintain sealevel power up to 12,000 feet MSL, so full rich or slightly leaned mixture would be used on takeoff. I think I would still lean for best power prior to releasing brakes for takeoff. You need to use full rich to keep the exhaust temperature down. With the turbocharged engine I normally fly, in my airplane, about a third of the fuel is used just for cooling (30 gph at full power, when theoretically only about 20 gph would be needed for the 270 hp). The turbocharger controller ensures that I am getting best power, without any fiddling with the mixture at all. Even in an aircraft with a manual wastegate, one would ensure best power using that control, not the mixture. Pete |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
"Jeff" wrote in message
... is this a turbo charged engine also? Is what a turbocharged engine also? Both the engine that John Smith is talking about and the engine that I am talking about are turbocharged, as we both stated in our posts. I have taken off with a DA of 8800 ft, full rich and not had a problem in my T-arrow I use full rich on take off and landing, as my POH says to do. Have you landed with a DA of 8800' with the mixture full rich? On my airplane (and apparently John's), the engine would stop on rollout. That said, maybe you have a superior fuel system on the Turbo Arrow, or perhaps the engine is just somehow inherently more immune to overly rich mixtures. Pete |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Barry
Klein wrote: How should we have found the correct mixture setting for power-off final approach, when the turbo is basically adding no boost and we are at high density altitude? My best advice is to go to www.avweb.com and read all of John Deakin's articles on engine operation. These are gems of wisdom that every flight instructor should have in their kit. Somewhere I read an article that related that many aircraft carburetors/injectors are not properly set for idle. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
How does it idle? 500 rpm is the bottom end... Another 25 - 30 rpm may help
if it is idling rough... On the issue of full rich, if you are landing at a low altitude airport then progressivley enriching the mixture in the descent,arriving at full rich on short final, makes sense, as the air density in the manifold will be reasonably high, even after the turbo has spun down and is not boosting much... But, if you are landing at an altitude airport, then the throttle pulled back will allow the turbo to spin down, same as for low altitude airports, but the intake manifold air density will be low thin and full rich may lead to a flame out - especially if you have to hit the throttle for a missed approach, wind shear, etc... Full rich with full throttle is likely to cause a stumble/stall at that point.... I would tend to keep it reasonably lean during descent and approach to avoid plug fouling and to keep it warm, only going to the 'appropriate' takeoff setting on short final, which is not necessarily full rich at higher altitude airports... You have already done your homework and know how far in to put the mixture on short final for the airport you were at... For takeoff, I would run up to 1800 rpm and lean for best power, knowing that full throttle will enrich the mixture further, automatically... Just watch your manifold pressure and cylinder head temps during climbout and richen slightly if needed... denny "Barry Klein" wrote in message om... We took a newer 182 turbo to a 7000' elevation airport yesterday and the engine quit at the end of the landing roll. I'm sure the mixture was way too rich. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
FWIW here's my TR182 experience. Of course the engine in
a TR182 is a very different beast from a T182T (carburetted rather than injected, and turbo-normalized only, never boost above 31"). Full rich for takeoff, regardless of altitude, at 31" MP. Lean to around 18 GPH (1350 or so TIT) with power reduction to 25" at around 1000 AGL. Lean to 1450 TIT for cruise. Descend without further adjustment - TIT remains steady. I've never experienced rough running in this situation. Full rich as part of GUMPS check prior to takeoff, in case of go-around. John "Barry Klein" wrote in message om... We took a newer 182 turbo to a 7000' elevation airport yesterday and the engine quit at the end of the landing roll. I'm sure the mixture was way too rich. It restarted without incident, glad we were on the ground! We had the mixture set about 100 deg rich of peak TIT for cruise at 9500. How should we have found the correct mixture setting for power-off final approach, when the turbo is basically adding no boost and we are at high density altitude? This is not addressed in the POH. It does say full rich on takoff regardless of airport elevation. Later that day, when taxiing for takoff, we set 1200 rpm and leaned for peak rpm, mixture knob was out 1.5-2 inches to achieve this. When we returned home to 800' elevation, we checked the idle speed at full rich, it was about 500 rpm, is this too low? Thanks, Barry |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
David,
I believe your POH does call for full rich prior to landing (but not in the descent) in preparation for a possible go around. Otherwise, there is no reason to enrichen it. At very high altitude airports, landing with full rich mixture may cause a rough idle or the engine may actually quit at the end of rollout, but that depends on the idle mixture adjustment on your engine. If your engine runs fine at full rich at low power settings on the ground, then there is no problem with going to full rich on final in preparation for a go around. However, you may want to lean it while taxiing (lean it a long ways so that it will simply quit should you try to take off prior to going to full rich and it will remind you) so as to help avoid plug fouling. All the best, Rick David Rind wrote in message ... Rick Durden wrote: Otherwise, the only reason to enrichen the mixture during descent is if the engine actually begins to run roughly. (See the POH which only recommends enrichening if you experience engine roughness.) Most people descend at 65% power or less, which means that it is impossible to detonate the engine due to lack of heat and pressure, so it's impossible to run it too lean (it will simply start to run rough and then quit if you get it too lean, you won't hurt anything). Keeping it leaned during descent helps avoid overcooling (if you believe in shock cooling), helps keep the plugs from fouling and doesn't waste fuel. In general, once you lean the engine for cruise on a T182 you needn't touch the mixture control until you pull it to idle cutoff after landing, or to go to full rich on a go around. All the best, Rick The POH for my TB-21 (turbocharged Trinidad) with a Lycoming TIO-540 calls for putting the mixture full rich prior to landing. Is that different from what most people do with this engine? |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
yes that was the question, I did not see where you said yours was a turbo
charged also, must have over looked it. yes I have landed to refuel with the DA at 8800 ft. Is it superior - beats me, I just follow my POH and havnt had a problem yet. Peter Duniho wrote: Is what a turbocharged engine also? Both the engine that John Smith is talking about and the engine that I am talking about are turbocharged, as we both stated in our posts. I have taken off with a DA of 8800 ft, full rich and not had a problem in my T-arrow I use full rich on take off and landing, as my POH says to do. Have you landed with a DA of 8800' with the mixture full rich? On my airplane (and apparently John's), the engine would stop on rollout. That said, maybe you have a superior fuel system on the Turbo Arrow, or perhaps the engine is just somehow inherently more immune to overly rich mixtures. Pete |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Jeff
wrote: maybe a stupid question, but if its going to quit on you when you go full rich on landing, then dont it also risk the chance of quitting if you go full rich on a go around? unless its just the high power that keeps it running and idle is what kills it. Go around on approach (depending on height AGL), you will still have some air under you and it is amazing how fast your hand will push that mixture lever forward. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Rick Durden wrote:
David, I believe your POH does call for full rich prior to landing (but not in the descent) in preparation for a possible go around. Otherwise, there is no reason to enrichen it. At very high altitude airports, landing with full rich mixture may cause a rough idle or the engine may actually quit at the end of rollout, but that depends on the idle mixture adjustment on your engine. If your engine runs fine at full rich at low power settings on the ground, then there is no problem with going to full rich on final in preparation for a go around. However, you may want to lean it while taxiing (lean it a long ways so that it will simply quit should you try to take off prior to going to full rich and it will remind you) so as to help avoid plug fouling. All the best, Rick Thanks! So then if I think I'm capable of remembering to push in the mixture on a go around there is really no need to enrich the mixture prior to landing. FWIW, I'm good about aggressively leaning once I'm off the runway. -- David Rind |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPS approach question | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 08 03:54 AM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Canadian holding procedures | Derrick Early | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 22nd 04 04:03 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 09:03 PM |