![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "bbutlergps" wrote in message ps.com... I am in Texas and my French only works in Paris, Texas that is so I can't quite read that website on the Gaz_aile. Would you know how much it weighs and what the output is? Transportation isn't too big of a problem as long as you have time (ship) 6 weeks plus. I can pick it up anywhere along the Eastern sea board or Houston. their website says "il donne 53 CV à 5000 t/mn, pour 80 kg nu." which I would translate quite literally as if gives 53 HP at 5000 rpm, for a naked weight of 80 kgs. I suppose the "naked" means without alternator, radiatior &C In case you not know what kg is, 80 kgs corresponds roughly to 177lbs. PS could yo kindly post your replies BELOW the text you are answering to? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "karel" wrote in message ... ( ... ) their website says "il donne 53 CV à 5000 t/mn, pour 80 kg nu." more from their website: "Très facile à trouver en occasion pour 300 euros ou en échange standard pour 1 500 euros contre 13 000 euros pour un Rotax, et pas plus compliqué qu’un bon vieux VW." this engine is easily found secondhand for 300 euro's or 1500 for a factory rebuild, as apposed to 13000 euro's for a Rotax. And no more complicated than a good old Volkswagen engine. I have some issues he I wouldn't like to fly behind an engine savaged from a junkyard for 300 euro's, not unless profoundly revised which would probably be most expensive except for those who can do it themselves. OTOH 1500 euro's for a factory rebuild sounds like a nice deal! Not a word on the reduction, though, or I should have missed it. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 17:34:22 -0000, "karel"
wrote: "karel" wrote in message ... ( ... ) their website says "il donne 53 CV Ã* 5000 t/mn, pour 80 kg nu." more from their website: "Très facile Ã* trouver en occasion pour 300 euros ou en échange standard pour 1 500 euros contre 13 000 euros pour un Rotax, et pas plus compliqué qu’un bon vieux VW." this engine is easily found secondhand for 300 euro's or 1500 for a factory rebuild, as apposed to 13000 euro's for a Rotax. And no more complicated than a good old Volkswagen engine. I have some issues he I wouldn't like to fly behind an engine savaged from a junkyard for 300 euro's, not unless profoundly revised which would probably be most expensive except for those who can do it themselves. OTOH 1500 euro's for a factory rebuild sounds like a nice deal! Not a word on the reduction, though, or I should have missed it. The scrapyard engine could be totally beat, or it may have been replaced just days before the vehicle was damaged beyond repair - making it a virtually brand new engine -- or anything in between. I've seen some REAL GOOD engines sell cheap at the scrapyard,(and bought a few) and I've paid top dollar for some pretty crappy ones (which were returned). An example of the good ones? I paid $100 for a corvair engine which had been rebuilt less than 10,000 miles ago by a very anal german craftsman. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() clare at snyder.on.ca wrote in message news ![]() On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 17:34:22 -0000, "karel" wrote: "karel" wrote in message .. . ( ... ) their website says "il donne 53 CV à 5000 t/mn, pour 80 kg nu." more from their website: "Très facile à trouver en occasion pour 300 euros ou en échange standard pour 1 500 euros contre 13 000 euros pour un Rotax, et pas plus compliqué qu'un bon vieux VW." this engine is easily found secondhand for 300 euro's or 1500 for a factory rebuild, as apposed to 13000 euro's for a Rotax. And no more complicated than a good old Volkswagen engine. I have some issues he I wouldn't like to fly behind an engine savaged from a junkyard for 300 euro's, not unless profoundly revised which would probably be most expensive except for those who can do it themselves. OTOH 1500 euro's for a factory rebuild sounds like a nice deal! Not a word on the reduction, though, or I should have missed it. The scrapyard engine could be totally beat, or it may have been replaced just days before the vehicle was damaged beyond repair - making it a virtually brand new engine -- or anything in between. I've seen some REAL GOOD engines sell cheap at the scrapyard,(and bought a few) and I've paid top dollar for some pretty crappy ones (which were returned). Agreed, but that's exactly my point: if you're not an expert, how can you tell them apart? And the O/P seems to consider shipping one from Europe to the US, so a return is not that easy and certainly not free. That's why I would prefer the factory rebuild option. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "bbutlergps" wrote in message ps.com... No this aircraft is going to be manly flying to from our Ranch in North Texas. It isn't going to be a cross country plane. I have several reason to want to go the route of the Diesel one of which is the ability to get / use tax free off road diesel. Thanks, Bill Is tax free off-road diesel fuel cheaper than regular unleaded? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am looking into a power plant for a Zenith 701. I am very interested
in going the route of a diesel. Would anybody have any information on either the: Smart (Mercedes) 3 cyl. 95 hp Turbo Diesel (can be chipped up to 112 hp) found in the Smart ForFour or VW Lupo or Fox (euro) 3 cyl. 1.4 liter 70 hp Turbo Diesel (can be chipped up to 108 hp) What I am most interested in is weight and the PSRU. Be sure if you go with an auto diesel conversion, that the fuel pump does not need the oily content of the diesel to keep from wearing out prematurely. Jet fuel (which I am assuming you will be using) does not lubricate as well as diesel, and some converters have had problems with their fuel pumps, as a result. -- Jim in NC Thanks for some interesting new info. I had been fascinated by the diesel idea for a while, but gave up because of the weight penalty of the only diesels commonly available here in the USA. The primary reason for my interest was the continued availability of fuel (Jet-A) in the event that gasolene ceased to be available at most airports. I suspect that the fuel pumps for the newer electronically controlled "common rail" diesels are fairly tolerant; but, if Jet-A and Diesel fuels are not fully interchangeable, then diesel conversions could be very difficult to justify. Peter |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Go here................... http://www.ecofly.de/english.htm And then click on their prices and you will find a smart engine diesel all ready to install into aircraft. All the technical information is about the GAS version of the engine. The listed weight is 57Kg all up for that version. As a SWAG, I'll bet the Diesel is about 20-30% heavier. That's probably a good estimate. The only solid information that I found while I interested in the subject was that the diesel option added about 100 pounds to the curb weight of a current production VW Golf or Jetta. My best guess would be that 90 pounds of that is the difference in the engine weight. Peter |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Howdy,
I am looking into a power plant for a Zenith 701. I am very interested in going the route of a diesel. Would anybody have any information on either the: Smart (Mercedes) 3 cyl. 95 hp Turbo Diesel (can be chipped up to 112 hp) found in the Smart ForFour or VW Lupo or Fox (euro) 3 cyl. 1.4 liter 70 hp Turbo Diesel (can be chipped up to 108 hp) What I am most interested in is weight and the PSRU. Thanks, Bill Sorry to rain on your parade, but... That looks like a good way to turn on the "chip detector." :-( It is really trivial for cars, which almost never run more than about 30% of maximum power for extended periods. It is troublesome in trucks, and leads to shorter engine life--but the only casualty is the owner's checkbook. However in an airplane, I would take the manufacturer's power rating for truck use, reduce it by another 10%, and then consider maximum cruising power to be about 60 to 65% of that result. I know that a lot of conversion advocates regard that as heresy, but I am much more concerned that even I may still be too optomistic! Peter |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() flybynightkarmarepair wrote: wrote: Go here................... http://www.ecofly.de/english.htm And then click on their prices and you will find a smart engine diesel all ready to install into aircraft. All the technical information is about the GAS version of the engine. I think if you look around the website a little more you will notice they also sell a smart car diesel aircraft engine. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Dohm" wrote I suspect that the fuel pumps for the newer electronically controlled "common rail" diesels are fairly tolerant; but, if Jet-A and Diesel fuels are not fully interchangeable, then diesel conversions could be very difficult to justify. This is not to say that some engines are not fully capable of burning jet fuel. Some are. It is just saying that you need to find out if multiple people have put some good hours on the engine burning Jet A, without problems, before you go for it. If it is out there, it is a good bet that someone has used it. Find out, to avoid surprises. -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2-stroke diesel is the (near) future? | Max Kallio | Home Built | 134 | July 18th 05 12:39 AM |
2-stroke diesel is the (near) future? | Max Kallio | Rotorcraft | 123 | July 18th 05 12:39 AM |
Smart CDI diesel engine | Hans Zwakenberg | Home Built | 14 | January 9th 05 01:32 PM |
turbo stc? | The Weiss Family | Owning | 21 | October 3rd 04 10:35 PM |