If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sharing the Airspace
Great letter to the editor on AvWeb
concerning personal jets by George Davis, USAF (Ret): "We should remember that airline pilots are still the new kids on the block. I can remember the day when the Boeing 707 invaded my airspace for the first time. My F-86 and I -- until that point -- had been the only users of that rarified air. I learned to tolerate their invasion; they will just have to get used to the invasion of private jets." Amen! Although I fly as a passenger on airliners frequently, it doesn't seem fair that the corporations who own the airlines are able to influence the radius of class bravo regions. As the population increases, eventually more class bravo regions will be carved out around the country, and GA planes will be dodging each other in narrow little alleyways between all these restricted areas. The airlines will say that the common man should not be allowed to fly jets in "their" airspace. Don't the people own the airspace? The airlines will insist on special background checks on the pilots of these personal jets as well as rigorous training, maintenance standards, and Class I medical fitness. Bigger is not always better with aircraft; even though the Canadair regional jet is much smaller than the 757, it feels much less claustrophobic. And 9/11 proved that jetliners have a lot of momentum. Furthermore, while small planes routinely make safe off-airport landings, most off-airport landings in jetliners result in fatalities. The rest of aviation shouldn't necessarily have to kowtow to the needs of the "heavy" jetliners. At the same time however, it would not be viable for every passenger to travel in small aircraft because the current ATC system would be overloaded. Perhaps there is a more scalable way of coordinating air traffic. Maybe we need a more imaginative approach to dealing with the problem. The Nova program this week about recreating the Wright flyer demonstrated what an amazing achievement that Orville and Wilbur accomplished. It is impressive that they were able to overcome all of the technical obstacles with what they had available. It is remarkable that these first pilots did not get killed by their invention. Their ability to make a profit building aircraft, which remains a problem to this day, is commendable. It is highly appropriate that the FAA is honoring them. The vertical dimension adds a lot of complexity and is a very hard problem! Even 747 captains find it a little tricky, like the one who turned onto the wrong taxiway in Taipei in 2000. All those statistics about flying being safer than driving don't take into account that the average driver is a complete schmo -- just take a field trip to the DMV. The people tinkering around with rocket engines in order to win the X-prize share the spirit of the Wright Brothers. The inventors of these space planes are inspiring. I wish I possessed one tenth of their imagination. Buzz Aldrin said that we would never have made it to the moon with today's risk-averse zero-tolerance attitude. It is refreshing to know that there are still visionary people who are willing to take risks. Ted -- __ / \___/ | / / | / _ | / / \ _| __ / --- / | \__/ \__ \/\ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Ted Huffmire" wrote in message ... | | Amen! Although I fly as a passenger on airliners frequently, | it doesn't seem fair that the corporations who own the airlines are | able to influence the radius of class bravo regions. As the population | increases, eventually more class bravo regions will be carved out | around the country, and GA planes will be dodging each other | in narrow little alleyways between all these restricted areas. I fly GA in class B all the time. Class B is not a restricted area. As for private jets flying in class A, they already do. While it is true that as the number of private jets increases that there will be more planes in class A, it is also true that new technology is allowing better utilization of that airspace. The airlines have been trying to get rid of GA for years. Thus far they have not been successful, and their arguments now are just as bogus as they were twenty years ago. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On 2003-11-13 20:14:56 -0800, Ted Huffmire said
The airlines will insist on special background checks on the pilots of these personal jets as well as rigorou training, maintenance standards, and Class I medical fitness That's a bit much to assume. These so-called "personal jets" aren't any different than an owner-flown biz jet like an old Citation or 20-series Learjet that can be had for the same price that they're hoping get for an Eclipse 500. Anyone with a private pilot certificate and a third class medical who can pass the type rating checkride for a jet can fly one - single pilot, in some cases |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In article , C J Campbell
wrote: As for private jets flying in class A, they already do. While it is true that as the number of private jets increases that there will be more planes in class A, it is also true that new technology is allowing better utilization of that airspace. Isn't that what domestic reduced vertical separation is all about? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"C J Campbell" wrote
The airlines have been trying to get rid of GA for years. Thus far they have not been successful, and their arguments now are just as bogus as they were twenty years ago. C J, I have worked for several airlines over a 25 year period ranging in size from one of the world's largest (PanAm) to a one airplane airline (Dominicana). At a couple of them, I served as Director of Operations and at a couple of others, Chief Pilot. At NO time did "General Aviation" ever cross our minds. I don't know what my argument against them would have been. In the Miami area, I operated out of Miami International and GA pretty much stuck to Opa Locka and Tamiami. A much bigger problem to the jet carriers were all of those commuters flying turboprop bugsmashers. Bob Moore |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Robert Moore wrote: "C J Campbell" wrote The airlines have been trying to get rid of GA for years. Thus far they have not been successful, and their arguments now are just as bogus as they were twenty years ago. C J, I have worked for several airlines over a 25 year period ranging in size from one of the world's largest (PanAm) to a one airplane airline (Dominicana). At a couple of them, I served as Director of Operations and at a couple of others, Chief Pilot. At NO time did "General Aviation" ever cross our minds. But C.J. is right. As far as the lower levels are concerned, the airlines call the area below about 8,000' "Indian Country" and they would be very happy if every airport served by commercial aircraft had a class-B type airspace (the upside-down wedding cake) and all GA aircraft were prohibited from entry. As far as managemnet is concerned, GA is competition on a small scale, and they would really like it if all those corporations were forced to buy airline tickets instead of flying officers on leased or owned Citations. It's true that me and my Maule are beneath their notice (except as possible deviation sources in "Indian Country"), but I won't own it very long if I can't land or fly through the places the big boys go. George Patterson If you're not part of the solution, you can make a lot of money prolonging the problem. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... But C.J. is right. As far as the lower levels are concerned, the airlines call the area below about 8,000' "Indian Country" and they would be very happy if every airport served by commercial aircraft had a class-B type airspace (the upside-down wedding cake) and all GA aircraft were prohibited from entry. Actually, the usual Airline interference in GA is to make sure that GA pays more taxes so they can pay less and to decrease their impact on the terminal ground facilities. They don't seem to find us as a threat in the air. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? | john smith | Home Built | 11 | August 27th 04 02:29 AM |
most of eastern Massachussetts airspace closed in July | Christopher C. Stacy | Instrument Flight Rules | 29 | June 19th 04 12:47 AM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
Violating Airspace with GPS | John Bell | Piloting | 57 | November 5th 03 08:25 PM |
FA: Congested Airspace: A Pilot's Guide | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 10th 03 05:51 PM |